Wouldn't do no blame good gettin' stuck to the still out back'a the shed over yonder a piece ever ten minutes.
It'd cut down on production.
Posted on 08/31/2021 2:53:23 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
I always run my evil nano-chip magneto vaxxes through a coffee filter before shootin' 'em up.
I ain't getting any rusty graphite in ME, no SIR.
Wouldn't do no blame good gettin' stuck to the still out back'a the shed over yonder a piece ever ten minutes.
It'd cut down on production.
Or maybe it was the Fed Ex guy. I didn't think of that.
Lemme reevaluate my position.
You want to know what’s really rich? This “La Quinta Columna” “research group” these people go on about — it’s actually the name of the BLOG run by the anti-vaxxer activist Ricardo Delgado Martín who sent the vial (purportedly a vaccine vial) to Dr. Pablo Cambra, who obligingly used his electron microscope to analyze it, and wrote in his report that he could not verify the authenticity of this vial and that his results were not conclusive.
It rather looks like this blogger may have sent the poor professor a vial he tainted with graphene (and said blogger way overdid it — 90%!) or possibly some substance that has the same signature as graphene.
The only other “research group” in the world who claim to have found graphene in vaccine is the one headed by proven fraudster “Dr” Robert O. Young and his unnamed “team of scientists”. Did he even get hold of a vial and have it analyzed? It looks like he claimed to have done research he did not do before:
-
“Claims that Robert Young is a distinguished researcher are preposterous. The National Library of Medicine’s database contains no articles authored by “Young RO” that were published in a recognized scientific journal. His foundation’s 2011 tax return contain an expense item of $3,915 for “food for research subjects,” but the returns from 2003 to 2010 contain nothing that appear related to human clinical research activity and the 2012 return has no financial data.”
Link: https://quackwatch.org/11ind/young3/
(Links to foundation’s tax returns provided at above link)
So we’re supposed to believe him now? Oh, and that he found the parasite that causes Chagas, too.
I can understand why people question the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. There are valid reasons for concern. This appears to not be amomg them. Why waste time on hoaxes and hoaxers when we could be looking at real questions?
Dang right. Plus that thing gets hot.
(from your linked article)
In the statement clarify that it is false that a scientific study has been done to prove the above. likewise, clarify that the analysis made by a professor of the entity was misrepresented (Pablo Campra Madrid) on a sample of unknown origin. The University of Almeria expressed its support for vaccines.
Can you explain what the University's 'support for vaccines' has to do with science, and whether the Professor found graphine oxide in the sample? Maybe it has something to do with state funding? Maybe?
This ain't nothin' but....
#PoliticalScience
And you should know that. Instead, you take the position that the Emperor looks amazing in his new suit, as he struts down the street nekky with all his business danglin' and swayin' in the breeze.
The person who appears as the author of the report is the Doctor of Chemical Sciences and professor at the Higher Polytechnic School of the UAL. Document that does not have the support of the University.
Dude seems like he knows what he's talkin' about. He was even honest enough to state that he didn't get the sample directly off the Pfizer assembly line, which of course people like you use to dismiss his findings. The people at the Uni who 'do not support the paper' are burrocrats and didn't do the work. Best if they callete with they store bought ass.
But tell me more about how the evil anti-vaxxer dumped a bucket of graphene oxide in the soup.
You people sure can dance.
Re: 144 - Can you point in the research paper where Young discusses how vaccines were obtained?
Young claims that vaccines contain graphene oxide.
But as noted before, Young’s credibility (convicted felon, civil judgement for fraud) is a legitimate issue.
Claims regarding graphene oxide, etc would benefit being subjected to review by third parties.
I normally ignore your posts, but for once you posted something other than crude insults, hashtags and memes, so for once I will answer you.
It’s neither here nor there what the university says. What is important is what Dr. Campra himself wrote in his report, ie that results are not conclusive (true, as other substances can produce the same signature), and, more importantly, the origin of the sample is “unknown”. He further stated he received the sample in question from anti-vax activist and blogger Ricardo Delgado Martín.
It looks to me like Dr. Campra is a competent and honest scientist. He duly analysed the sample provided and reported his results.
We all know that many activists on the left and pro-vax activists believe in “anything to further the cause.” Anti-vax activists are hardly immune to that mindset. Activists of whatever stripe tend to be ideologically possessed. It is hardly outside the realm of possibility that this Martin fellow, who has been very busy promoting his graphene-5G-chemtrail-brain tsunami conspiracy theories, would succumb to the temptation to taint the sample he provided Dr. Campra and “prove” his wild theories. That is not a conspiracy, as it only involves one person, Martin. It’s easy to buy graphene oxide suspension over the internet.
Yes, “grand conspiracy theory” is correct! Martin and Young (and those who promote them) would have us believe thousands upon thousands of researchers, health officials in countries across the globe, lab technicians in the various independent labs checking the vaccines, employees of the companies producing the vaccines and their suppliers, doctors and other medical professionals — all these people are in on a grand conspiracy to hide the fact that the vaccines are 99% graphene?
And all the “proof” you have is the word of Martin, the professed conspiracy theorist who provided the sample to Dr. Campra, and this fake “Dr” Robert O. Young, who boasts multiple convictions for such lovely crimes as grand theft and practicing medicine without a license?
All neatly packaged up for you by none other than The Daily Expose riddled with donation appeal popups (we won’t tell you who we are, but please donate to us anyway!).
And no other scientists in all the world have noticed the vaccines are 99% graphene?
You have not addressed Young’s claim that the vaccines also contain the parasite that causes Chagas Disease (and attendant ridiculous claim it causes AIDS). And no one else has noticed? Wow. Again, the parasites are easy to spot with an ordinary lab microscope. Why has no one else spotted them in the vaccines or blood samples of vaccinated people? Are all the lab technicians, blood techs, and doctors the world over in on the conspiracy, too? Why haven’t doctors raised the alarm about the sudden spread of these parasites? Is every GP in the country part of this vast scheme? Why aren’t their patients posting about getting infested with Chagas-causing parasites? Are they all part of this grand conspiracy as well?
You are free to believe Ricardo Delgado Martin and “Dr” Robert O. Young if you please. I am free not to. I find them untrustworthy.
Again, there are legitimate concerns about the safety and efficacy of these vaccines. Whether to get the vaccine is a personal and private choice. We each must make our own informed decision. I won’t be factoring in anything from “Dr” Young when it comes to my own decisions. Others might, and they are free to do so.
As far as I can tell, Young does not disclose how he obtained the vaccines (if he obtained them at all) in his “study” as published on his website:
You may be able to find it. The link is the same as given by the OP.
Whether Young is even capable of doing a proper “analysis” given his lack of credentials and self-admitted lack of scientific background is debatable.
I’m not getting the vaccine. But it’s not because of anything this quack guy says. It’s because of all the other research available out there.
No, lad. You don't ignore my posts. Illustrated by the fact that you just listed what you see as their content. They get in your head and fester there, to fight against the moldy ideas that infest it. Sorta like a vaccine (that isn't poison and works, and doesn't have graphene oxide in it).
What you don't do is RESPOND. Two different words. But now that I have you here....
It’s neither here nor there what the university says. What is important is what Dr. Campra himself wrote in his report.
You start out with a bang, and right you are. He said he found graphene oxide and other elements not listed in the ingredients. According to you, that only leaves the possibility that the sender of the vax (or the Fed-EX man) added them.
Your conspiracy theory states that the 'anti-vaxxer activist' (as defined by vaxxers) bought the graphene off the internet. I guess he bought that other disease causing one off the internet too? Or found it under a rock?
You say because he's a maniac ideologue that he added the graphene to prove his bizarre theory that there was graphene in the vax. Seems to me, that it would be better if there was no graphene in the vax and even the 'maniac' would be happy to be wrong. I would be, and I'm a maniac.
You seem happy to apply evil motives to everybody BUT the purveyors and operators of this entire covid/hoax.
Vaxxers good...'Anti-Vaxxers' bad is your motto (and all these FR vaxbots). That is your starting point.
No, my compliant FRiend. The so-called 'anti-vaxxers' are not the bad guys in this scenario, whether they are maniacal truth seekers and 'whistleblowers' or government sponsored, profit driven cowards (Pfizer, socialized 'medical community'), or donor and tax dependent Universities, and other bought and paid for 'scientists' (grants).
You need to learn who the players are before you pop off with your wild conspiracy allegations and blind acceptance of what you're told by those same people.
Also, in case you were unaware, the CIA/Derp State makes it their business to dirty up the reputations of people who seek to destroy their carefully arranged narrative (you may call it 'conspiracy theory if you like. After all, CIA invented the practice and trained you).
Up to and including selective prosecution for things like 'grand theft' and 'impersonating a doctor', amongst other things. All of a sudden, not a word that person says will be taken seriously. Happens every day, in case you weren't paying attention. Look around.
Oh, and as for your conspiracy theory that EVERYBODY from top to bottom would have to be in on it. Pish posh. It would only take a handful of people at the top to accomplish this. Do you think the street meth dealers who dealt Walter White's blue meth knew what was in it or how it was made? The distributors?
As I recall, only Heisenberg and Jesse Pinkman knew the exact recipe.
Your conspiracy theory is bupkis.
(and since you like my memes so much)
In summation:
Graphene oxide was found in two samples of the vax. There are papers even by the derp socialized medicine people you listen to explaining their experimentation with it and what they think its useful for.
So, young one. Go out into the world and look around for the big picture. Add all the pieces, and know the truth.
If you refuse to do that. If its too scary and taxing on your brain pan, then just listen to good old Uncle Bagster.
I won't steer you wrong.
Promise.
We just watched the “Say My Name” episode a couple hours ago.
Binge watching the second time.
Got to get ready for Better Call Saul next season.
FR Thread:Graphene Oxide Is the Main Ingredient in Covid Jabs Says Former Pfizer Employee"
(excerpt)
Graphene Oxide Is the Main Ingredient in Covid Jabs Says Former Pfizer Employee According to a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for pharmaceutical industries, graphene oxide nanoparticles are the key ingredient in Biotech’s Covid-19 shots, the product which is being marketed as a “vaccine”. But bad news from Japan may have an impact on this marketing strategy.
(much more in article as to why she says this)
The dam is bursting, vaxbot. Not too late to get on the right side of history.
“Better Call Saul next season.”
It’s that supposed to be in November?
By the way, when I went to check on your question at Young’s website
I decided to run a few of his images through TinEye to see if he’d filched them off the web. The one Young labelled Fig 1a has been available on the web since 2010 and found by TinEye on five other sites:
https://tineye.com/search/14cbe25cd5a707ec70f4fba01b89f28abb8a5f21?sort=score&order=desc&page=1
Young cropped it some, but TinEye still managed to find it. Came up empty on a couple of other images, but one was two images pasted together by Young, the other severely cropped, so TinEye would not have been able to find them.
Anyway, the fact that he snagged just one off the web casts suspicion. Hardly professional. Hardly what a proper scientist would do.
Enough. I’m done with this “vaccines are 99% graphene” poppycock.
Re: 156 - Good find.
Young should have provided proper attribution if he was using 1a as a reference image. The same goes for any image not produced or generated by him or his team.
Again, it shows the need to have his research evaluated by third parties, especially given Young’s legal troubles regarding fraud, etc.
We know Young never wrote a scientific paper in his life, and it shows right off the bat. He made some clumsy efforts to ape a real scientific paper at first (although he could not resist liberally sprinkling exclamation marks throughout).
The "abstract" isn't. It's more like an introduction, but unlike one any real scientist would write.
His "Methodology and Techniques" section, well it is what it is. We know he does not own the millions of dollars worth of fancy dancy equipment he supposedly used (scanning electron microscope, etc), and he is not affiliated with any lab facility. Some university labs allow researchers to use their equipment, under supervision, for a hefty fee. But of course he never tells us where all this supposed analysis took place.
He apparently purports to not only have analyzed vaccine samples, but also live blood samples (!) because first up, Young has "Live Blood Phase Contrast and Dark-Field Microscopy" He does not inform us how he procured the blood samples, of course.
In Figure 1 You Can See What A Cluster Bomb of Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Looks Like in the Live Unstained Human Blood after a CoV-19 Inoculation Causing Pathological Blood Coagulation!
Is he claiming to have administered vaccine to subjects and then immediately drawn blood samples? It gets curiouser and curiouser.
Figure 1a is the "healthy blood" image he snagged off the net, already mentioned in our precious posts. Next up:
Figure 1b Micrograph taken under Phase Contrast Microscopy reveals the live blood 24 hours after the mRNA Vaccine now containing crystallized red blood cells, biological transformations of red and white blood cells, large symplasts of graphene oxide crystals center and Orotic acid crystals in the upper right hand corner of the micrograph.
So is he claiming he drew further blood samples from subjects 24 hours after he administered the vaccine?
Okay, scrolling on down to his supposed discovery of Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas parasite) in the Pfizer vaccine, he has:
Figure 13 shows a Trypanosoma Parasite approximately 50 microns in length found in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine”. It is composed of carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen." (Ahem)
followed by an image labeled:
A Live Blood pHase Contrast Microscopy Micrograph of Trypanosoma cruzi Parasite[9]
Only it ***is not*** an image of Trypanosoma cruzi. It's an image of Trypanosoma vivax he stole from the Merck Veterinary Manual:
https://www.merckvetmanual.com/circulatory-system/blood-parasites/trypanosomiasis
Now, scrolling way on down we find his Fig 25, labelled thusly:
Figure 25 Shows "The Corona Effect" and the the Endogenous Birth of S1 Protein Spikes Caused by Radiation and Chemical Poisoning or What I Call The "Protein Spiking Effect
This supposed image of "the Endogenous Birth of S1 Protein Spikes" was snagged off a now-defunct Hungarian site promoting the same "alkanize your body" hokum Young pushed (you know, those expensive baking soda IVs that did not cure the cancer patients and landed him in jail). TinEye first scraped this image in 2010:
https://tineye.com/search/062619c899da8492583de141b645c8191fec3872?sort=score&order=desc&page=1
Scrolling down further, past the Adobe Stock image labeled Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) or Pathological Blood Coagulation.[57][58] Young informs us that There is NO CORONA VIRUS and NEVER HAS BEEN!
Scroll down more, past the part where he flogs his his books for sale (yup, still pushing his "miracle cures"!) and videos to #11, and Young will tell you "Why viruses do not exist!"
Does any sane person really believe this guy somehow got access to a properly equipped lab (one that would allow him to draw, or have blood drawn from human subjects, yet!) and carried out a proper analysis of these vaccines as claimed? Can any serious person take any of this guy's claims seriously?
> Can any serious person take any of this guy’s claims seriously? <
Young was once sentenced to prison for practicing as a physician without having a medical degree. He actually has no legitimate degrees at all. The guy is 100% a con man. Please see my post #220.
Oops, forgot to include link to the so-called published paper on Young’s website:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.