Posted on 12/08/2020 2:39:43 PM PST by Kaslin
90% of the people responding on this thread have no clue, and cannot buy a clue, about the significance, or lack thereof,of this ruling.
If that is the case, then the court is basically setting up a fraud free-for-all where elections will always be decided by the biggest cheat.
Doing so pretty much guarantees an outlet for political expression for states outside the normal political/electoral processes. A handful of cities just made themselves the rulers of a nation of 300 million. The election was overthrown between 11pm and 3am election night.
The last time this happened was 1876, and they were smart enough to know they could not let it stand.
“The Court is not going to overturn the election, but I want mail in balloting curbed going forward.”
I agree. But I will go one step further: I want mail-in balloting rendered illegal.
Traitor Roberts continues to rule...as a Traitor to the Constitution.
The ignorance of the left who are cheering this on is astounding. They actually believe that when tyranny is unchained it will only devour the side they don’t like.
There is no election to “overturn”. Only a fraud proclaimed as won by the fraudsters and the media.
So what if the red states withhold their electors...because the entire election is illegitimate?
Lawyer speak.
Sorry. It was the article’s last sentence, not yours.
The states need to go on record as opposing this massive fraud—regardless of the outcome.
Worst case—it sets a predicate for future secession—if the Union has no rule of law, then it has no basis for being a Union at all.
I also want early voting, at least of the weeks and weeks variety, banned, along with a strict law (as if the law means anything any more) that says no ballots anywhere can be accepted after polls close on election day.
OK, I will plead ignorance if you will explain the significance.
He must always be called, His fraudency.Unless these states and courts act now, after 12 days of a Biden presidency, no one will even remember His Fraudency,as they'll be instead speaking about "President Harris."
” this Court rightly seeks to avoid inflaming social disorder”
So decisions are to be made with respect to how badly it might upset one or another faction?
Tell it to Dred Scott.
Now we get to see Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett show there gratitude to Trump for putting them where they are by giving the Dems everything they want.
“We are in a severe crisis”
The most severe since 1861.
Either the truth of this election is dragged out into the open or the Republic is GONE. There is no way to talk this one into submission. It’s not a little thing. We don’t hand over control of the US military to a gang of frozen faced thugs led by a slum girl from Oakland just because they pulled off a brazen heist.
“Now we get to see Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett show there gratitude to Trump for putting them where they are by giving the Dems everything they want.”
Kavanaugh is a Bushite and even Barret has connections with Bush.
Thank you for slicing through some of the emotional blindness that occurs on this forum. Old szying: it is not what you know but what you can prove. God will chose who sits in the Oval Office on January 21st., whether we like His choice or not...
the injuction was denied
the injunction was denied at this time
the case is still ongoing doomers
ithe case itself was not denied, or tossed or rendered moot
snap out of it—cher
Sure. And the people who are trying to seize control of this election are going to do just that should they profit from the system. (Sarcasm).
If they win, its over. As simple as that
Elections will no longer have any meaning as the courts refuse to assure their integrity and we no longer a Republic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.