Posted on 05/03/2020 4:04:58 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot
Correction: The FBI IS a lie.
“Chris Wallace is the same smarmy, smug liberal sh!t his old man was.”
Chrissy’s old man, the tough gutsy Mike Wallace who courageously slut-shamed a 23 year old AIDS victim, Kimberly Bergalis, two years after her death because she was a straight white virgin infected by a faggie dentist.
Wallace Sr. went on to outlive Ms. Bergalis by seventy years.
OMG, FReepers are a treasure trove of forgotten information. I had no idea....
Agree with what you say Pence should do
Spot on.
Heh, heh, when you’ve reached my age, the old saw about “I’ve forgotten more than you’ll ever remember” takes effect.
Has its downside, though, like the blank looks I get from young women as they ask, “What’s an LP record?” or “What’s a tape recorder?” or “You don’t have an iPhone!!?”.
But I will never forget Wallace’s angry TV glare as he “responded” to critics over what he said about Ms. Bergalis. At that point, he revealed himself to be pure evil, without a soul.
Not as much as the FBI lied to us.
Chris Wallace’s breath smells more like his dead dad’s butt every day.
I agree completely. How else does a moron with an idiot’s face and a high pitched whining voice with a lisp get a job as a television news reporter? I change the channel the instant that buffoon appears on the screen.
** I used to like Chris Wallace **
Wallace is all-over-the-map. But as someone on Freerepublic pointed out, Fox News exists for the Neocon wing of the Republican Party (the Bushes, Grahams, etc). So while Chris Wallace is perhaps not as overtly liberal as his old man, he’s not somebody we conservatives can rely on to consistently report from a conservative viewpoint because FoxNews itself doesn’t hold to our viewpoint.
His daddy made sure that nepotism worked. Otherwise that idiot would be asking if you wanted fries with that.
Chris Wallace is a communist rat face fool.
Spot on “essentially exonerated” by new documents unsealed in his criminal case.
He never lets facts get in the way of his agenda just like the other feral media members.
I have heard several people make the same argument as Wallace; however, that thought process is turning our justice system on it’s head. The defendant, of all people, is entitled to rely on the accuracy of evidence presented by the government. When the government puts on record falsified documents and perjured testimony to support a charge, any decision made by the defendant on how to structure his defense or what plea to enter is severely distorted. When shown clear evidence of your guilt, it is a moral thing to accept responsibility but if that evidence is later shown to be false or fabricated, there should be universal support for the aggrieved and condemnation of the perpetrator. In this case, people like Wallace seem to think it is normal for the government to lie and Flynn to somehow be culpable for believing them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.