Posted on 04/15/2020 11:49:43 AM PDT by Rebelbase
I just saw an article with data showing indeed, very few w/o “underlying conditions” die so far.
Not sure this is what I was thinking of, from WA state:
https://www.doh.wa.gov/Emergencies/Coronavirus
under “demographics”. Nothing about health status, but the age-group thing is overwhelming.
My uncle. Multiple morbities, age & dementia.
Thank you.. shes a wonderful person.
Shes so far doing pretty well. Yesterday, she had some stressful breathing, but this morning was much more rested and feeling better. Shes using a CPAP-like instrument to press air into her lungs.. much better than a ventilator. She ate a full breakfast this a.m. and has no fever.
JMO, I feel like one of those milkmaids that Edward Jenner was observing, when he came up with the smallpox vaccine.
No. A family across the street from me had it but all recovered nicely.
“I just saw an article with data showing indeed, very few w/o underlying conditions die so far.”
Thanks for the link. I agree, most fatalities do have some kind of underlying conditions...but it’s not quite as absolute as some assert. Also of concern is that the list of underlying conditions has grown to such an extent that so many people have one or more of them that it becomes somewhat less relevant. For example, I know very few people who aren’t to some degree overweight, or have some amount of high blood pressure, or (if it were to be regularly monitored) unhealthy swings in their blood sugar levels, etc. I think there may be other (genetic?) risk factors that are yet unaccounted for.
“I am convinced there is no way this thing is just some natural entity in the environment,”
Agree 100%!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.