Women? No.
Women? No.
It’s downright ridiculous to ascribe today’s PC “standard” of sexual conduct to 40 years ago, when innocent, yet potentially suggestive, conduct was par for a lot of people. For instance, you used to be able to compliment a co-worker, or even a subordinate, on her dress or hairstyle in the day, but now that is deemed almost a firing offense.
PENCE!!!!!!!
Witch hunt
Every woman has her butt pinched is ruined for life now
My wife thinks this is nuts but fun to watch
The single-best response that can be given to the question raised in the title: it depends on what the definition of “is” is...
One eventuality of all this will be an intensification of justified male paranoia agout even speaking to any female in anyt manner in any setting because even while some of this will be disproved, men’s liabilities will be magnified due to the constant din of female complaints, as a great part of womanhood will realize they have even easier access to free money and free support than before this particular fad. Speaking to a woman will hav just as much social stigma as perpetrating rape. It forces men to the margins while at the same time making women rationally unemployable by companies owned or run by men.
Is There Anyone Left Who Has Not Sexually Mistreated Women?
= = =
Just what is the definition of ‘Sexually Mistreated’?
IMO, this is just another “outrage of the month” fad that will die out before the new year. The public’s attention span can take just so much before it tires and moves on. Already, the “taking the knee” idiocy is dying down and the Russian and Impeachment thingys are dead to all but a few “bitter clingers”.
In all honesty, what was the “outrage” before them?
-PJ