Posted on 05/30/2017 10:26:25 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Hey Jim just so these guys know I’m “brave enough” to ping you just like they do when they are tattling on blog pimps. You might find their fantasy that I am Sean_Anthony just as funny as I do.
The real issue is content. Have you noticed the majority of posters are positive about the content of Sean’s posts?? Its a pretty select few ignore the content and bitch moan and whine about blog pimping.
I have all day too!
Now now, context is everything.
YOU have an issue with people not liking blogpimps excerpting their “works”.
So when the guidelines were posted, you argued about it.
So you were told to take it up with the one who made them.
You instead backpedaled and whined, then argued.
So, I’ll link it all for you AGAIN and you can take them and speak with him privately about it all.
Okay?
Was that so hard?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2636843/posts?page=552#552
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2711802/posts?page=139#139
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2722423/posts
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2776537/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2548666/posts?page=38#38
“The real issue is content.”
You obviously did not read any of the links on blogpimps that were given to you.
The issue is “Excerpting” own content.
Heck, how many times is Excerpting mentioned in the quote at the following link?
http://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3556516/posts?page=84#84
How many times is “NOT AN EXCERPT” stated?
I’m sure you can find it.
It’s obvious it’s not “own content” - the article was written by someone other than Sean. Which is probably why 13 years of bitching, moaning and whining about him has had no effect. He doesn’t post his “own content”.
“Impotent rage” “shrieking at US”
How dramatic! Probably should quit eating the mushrooms in that rabbit hole!
LOL!
And also the following statement was in there: “Were not really that interested in driving OUR traffic to YOUR blog.”
Yes, impotent rage.
You’d get more mileage by discussing whatever your problem is with us not liking blog pimp excerpts with the guy who made the guidelines.
“Its obvious its not own content”
So it WAS taken (stolen) from Herman Cain.
Are all these sites “blogs”? If not what’s the difference?
celebrityinsider.org
history.com
www.wnd.com
townhall.com
tmz.com
lifezette.com
breitbart.com
cnsnews.com
biggeekdad.com
independentsentinel.com
legalinsurrection.com
freebeacon.com
thegatewaypundit.com
Well then tattle, bitch, moan, and whine like a first grader, get Sean zotted.
Again, take it up with the guy who owns the show.
Arguing with US doesn’t do anything other than prove that you’re merely there to argue.
Sure sounds like your feelings are hurt.
Why is that?
You have the problem with “blogpimping” and Sean so take it up with the guy who owns the show. Arguing with me doesnt do anything other than prove that youre merely there to argue.
Sean has been here for 13 years so I’m happy. Management must know more about him than either you or I.
LOL!! Yet another strawman!
The goal is to get the blogpimps to FOLLOW the GUIDELINES.
It’s simple really.
Why is that so hard to understand?
No, not a strawman.
You’re really broken up over this.
Why?
And I note you had ZERO response to the following:
Were not really that interested in driving OUR traffic to YOUR blog.
NOT AN EXCERPT
Why?
Sean doesn’t post “his own content” why is that so hard to understand? Canada Free Press is no different than;
celebrityinsider.org
history.com
www.wnd.com
townhall.com
tmz.com
lifezette.com
breitbart.com
cnsnews.com
biggeekdad.com
independentsentinel.com
legalinsurrection.com
freebeacon.com
thegatewaypundit.com
Why is that so hard to understand?
So it IS stolen content passed off as own content.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.