Skip to comments.
Donald Trump vs. Personal Integrity: The Ongoing Battle for Coexistence
Patriot Post ^
| 26 Feburary 2016
| Joan Fischer
Posted on 02/26/2016 1:18:13 PM PST by joanie-f
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
1
posted on
02/26/2016 1:18:13 PM PST
by
joanie-f
To: joanie-f
The most important takeaway from the debate came right after the debate:
The Great Conservative has now SWERVED to support the 8Gang Cabana Boy.
Cruz is now the Great Conswervative.
2
posted on
02/26/2016 1:18:41 PM PST
by
samtheman
(Trump For America! Cruz for Rubio!)
To: joanie-f
Trump is winning because people respect him more than they respect status quo politics and politicians.
It’s pretty simple.
3
posted on
02/26/2016 1:20:03 PM PST
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: dynoman; Jeff Head
Anyone who can include Ted Cruz under the category of ‘status quo’ politician simply hasn’t been paying attention to his constant battles against precisely that in the senate.
4
posted on
02/26/2016 1:24:58 PM PST
by
joanie-f
(If you believe that God is your co-pilot, it might be time to switch seats ...)
To: samtheman
This was not about cruz. Address it!
5
posted on
02/26/2016 1:25:45 PM PST
by
buckeye49
To: joanie-f
All that changed in IA when he went gutter and then doubled down with deliberate lies, half truths, misrepresentations. Ever since he took that fork in the road his numbers have went down.
It's not a coincidence.
6
posted on
02/26/2016 1:29:02 PM PST
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: dynoman
So.we have to go from status quo to a crook?
7
posted on
02/26/2016 1:30:09 PM PST
by
buckeye49
To: dynoman
So.we have to go from status quo to a crook?
8
posted on
02/26/2016 1:30:17 PM PST
by
buckeye49
To: buckeye49
I wouldn’t call Ted a crook. He’s just a liar.
9
posted on
02/26/2016 1:32:03 PM PST
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: joanie-f
10
posted on
02/26/2016 1:32:22 PM PST
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Trump to McCain - "Pass the strawberries".)
To: joanie-f
Integrity seems to be losing.
11
posted on
02/26/2016 1:32:44 PM PST
by
TBP
(0bama lies, Granny dies.)
To: joanie-f
Battles? Seriously... The man is a hit and run politician, and has nothing to show for his yipping and yapping.
12
posted on
02/26/2016 1:34:15 PM PST
by
Just mythoughts
(Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
To: buckeye49
Address it!
This is an anti-Trump hit piece with the underlying meaning of:
Vote for Cruz. Vote for Rubio. Do not vote for Trump.
I am addressing that by addressing the internal contradictions of the underlying meaning.
13
posted on
02/26/2016 1:34:53 PM PST
by
samtheman
(Trump For America! Cruz for Rubio!)
To: joanie-f
Personal integrity. What is that? Who in government has it? Might be one of the reasons our nation today has so many problems. How do you get that back? By continuing the same old tried and failed programs? Is Trump the answer. I do not know, but is worth considering. Cruz, Rubio, Hillary and Sanders are not.
14
posted on
02/26/2016 1:36:34 PM PST
by
mulligan
(I)
To: dynoman
Just because Trump says something, that doesn’t make it so - no matter how many trumptards repeat it ad nauseum.
15
posted on
02/26/2016 1:39:02 PM PST
by
LouD
To: samtheman
To: LouD
17
posted on
02/26/2016 1:41:41 PM PST
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: joanie-f
18
posted on
02/26/2016 1:42:10 PM PST
by
Slyfox
(Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
To: dynoman
You mean when he repeated a CNN story? Blame CNN. Carson should have dropped out months ago.
19
posted on
02/26/2016 1:44:40 PM PST
by
LouD
To: joanie-f
Well apprently Joanie you are willing to compromise yourself 100%
Please explain to us how electing Hillary âCult of Sanger and Abortionâ Clinton who is 100% opposed and will actively work against your values is less compromising to your values then voting for someone who agrees with your values 75%?
What you are doing here is creating a false rationalization to justify an act of childish spite based on nothing more then an urge to “get even with them” because your candidate was rejected by the voters.
20
posted on
02/26/2016 1:45:13 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
( Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson