Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/25/2015 3:27:57 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This mayor wants to publicize who’s on welfare and where they live,p>Even more useful would be to identify Section 8 housing. The rest follows.
Usually that's a major neighborhood disruption : No manners, lots of screaming, loud music, break-ins, drug sales, etc...
44 posted on 09/25/2015 4:54:48 PM PDT by publius911 (Pissed?? You have NO idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I have a better idea. Anyone who has received a payment of any kind other than a court judgement from the government since the last election should be ineligible to vote in the next election. This should include welfare recipients of course, but also government employees, elected officials, as well as employees and stock holders of government contractors.


45 posted on 09/25/2015 4:56:50 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I would agree to that!!!


51 posted on 09/25/2015 5:19:26 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 (I have such happy days, and hope you do to!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The new law should include 3 additional elements:
1) a system for private citizens to report benefit fraud, with financial awards for cases where fraud is successfully stopped.
2) Huge penalties and prison terms for government employees who creating fraud so that accomplices could unmask it for a split of the reward.
3) Lifetime cut off from benefits for those caught cheating.

In Maine alone, there are probably thousands of cases of things like claiming dependent children borrowed to take to the benefits interview, fake disabilities, multiple identities, non-residents, benefits mailed to other states and countries, people who work off the books, etc. Individuals and law firms would be all over this to get a few hundred bucks per successful case, resulting in millions in savings.


72 posted on 09/25/2015 6:54:51 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Will it include the names an addresses of everyone who works for the government? Of all retired elected “officials”?

Will they name the top management of organizations heavily supported by taxpayer dollars? All the university “professors” who never teach a class? Corporate CEO’s whose company’s depend on government subsidies? Farmer’s paid not to grow crops?

I have a better idea. For ALL elections, at every level, prohibit donations or funding of any kind - including “in kind” (are you listening PAC’s?) from anyone except individuals. In any amount .. no limit. But your name and city of residence must be reported in candidate’s website before funds are available.

Invasion of privacy? I thought the right to give money to political campaigns was protected as “free speech”. And it can’t be speech if you don’t want to be heard.


74 posted on 09/25/2015 8:15:51 PM PDT by motor_racer (Who will bell the cat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson