Don't forget the musloids...they need to go home, as well.
It’s amazing how many believe that the rule of law and national sovereignty is optional.
To many here to cut of welfare and kick out of jobs and the riots would destroy much of America. We are talking about around 30 millions illegals that would face starvation. Never happen that way. Deporting all of them will not work because the border is not secure. We are up the proverbial shi! creek and damn well without a paddle.
It’s amazing how many still believe that the rule of law, national sovereignty, and national security, are optional.
Our immigration policy should be to secure our border immediately and at the same time begin to speedily deport anyone and everyone who has entered our country without our permission to their own country.
We must once again apply great scrutiny to anyone that we do allow into the United States legally.
Also, the numbers that we do allow in should be greatly reduced for the foreseeable future. We have let in a huge mass of people in recent decades, and it’s time to allow time for assimilation of those people to occur.
Oh, and last but not least, stop slaughtering our own posterity. America is supposed to be THEIR inheritance.
Problems solved.
I’m in favor with deporting.... but we have to realize that in some states (like Oklahoma) once deportation takes place nobody will be able to pour concrete, put roofs on houses, or hire lawn work done for a while.
I am a conservative, not a Republican.
I want to strip the citizenship from employers of illegals and send them into exile too.
Especially including any who may have infiltrated Free Republic and who post here.
I've been hearing this 11 million number for several years even though the increase is very evident. I wonder what the real number is?
Put a $50 bounty on them, payable at any border crossing for alive, un-injured aliens and I35 southbound would be packed with rednecks in dually pickups pulling stock trailers....
Big majority of AMERICANS favor mass deportation . . . FIXED.
I approve of the re-instatement of “Operation Wetback” from the Eisenhower years.
I would also support the cancellation of most H1B visas that take the food out of the mouths of American families and give it to foreign workers; at least until American engineers, scientists and technicians are off the unemployment rolls. When the unemployed American engineers and scientists are working again, they we could revisit the programs and re-institute it with severe limitations.
It would be so easy. Cut them off...no schools, no hospitals, no food stamps, no jobs...there will be a mass deportation happening on its own.
That don't make no sense. Conservatives want to protect the border and deport less than other Republicans?
Best way to stop flow at the border is to threaten Mexico with a 10% surcharge on remittances.
I don’t favor mass deportation, because it’s too expensive. I favor for those deported a permanent ban on re-entry and on any path to citizenship, with at least a five-year automatic prison sentence if apprehended in the country illegally after deportation, with deportation for all illegals who use government services (including schools), with strict enforcement of employment laws, with home countries paid to house their illegals in their much less expensive prisons for a couple years on a first offense so illegals have something to fear in breaking our laws, and with secure borders and searches for those who overstay entry visas.
With real enforcement and penalties that matter, most illegals will self-deport. Then I favor prison followed by universal deportation of the occasional illegals who come anyways.
Once we have secure borders, I favor a legal immigration system focused on bringing in immigrants who will benefit the American people, including not competing with long-term unemployed Americans. Congress should decide who can come, and how many, and we should be strict about limiting legal immigrants to those categories and numbers, with no illegals tolerated at all.
Deportations by the expletive train car load. Standing room only, and miles long.
Get them out and then let them apply to come back the right way.
There is a fundamental problem with the entire premise of the article, and the polls.
We all know that how the questions are phrased determines how the answers will be chosen. If the "ideal" solution answer is never an option, it will never prevail.
Another aspect of the premise is that the "respondents are always divided (pigeonholed) between Dems and GOP, rather than "liberal/socialists" and fiscal/social conservatives of no specific party!
That changes the entire spectrum of useful answers.