Posted on 04/12/2015 2:53:19 PM PDT by Art in Idaho
Nope. She will do that bitchy populist, condescending crap in the debate. Low info voters love that crap.
She has to be wounded before that point. Now that she’s announced, her testimony before the house will be a circus.
The LIVs aren't going to change. The bitchy populist routine will turn off the independents and fence sitters. We'll see. .
Both are responsible for the chaos in the middle east — Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Iraq, Syria, etc.
Both are closely aligned with the muslim brotherhood.
Could be part of the reason she announced this early. She'll gun for the 'poor Hillary' crowd and 'ain't it awful. Bless her heart. .
Good points. Forgot to include the muslim brotherhood ties. Huma et al.
No doubt, but the media will be even worse...
No doubt, but the media will be even worse...
Almost makes you sick thinking how bad it's going to be. Thrill up the leg will be nothing. . . If they overdo it though, could turn into a net negative. We'll see. .
Here’s a longer thread with comments on Rules for Radicals
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2308852/posts
Thanks for posting hoosiermama.
I wish FOX or other programs would do an in-depth 2 hour program of R4R
Calling out those using the techniques - naming names and incidents
If you know anyone with contacts pass on or send the contact info to me to pass on.
Attacking people is not nearly as successful as exposing their actions for what they are trying to succeed
Many thanks!
I’ve a copy of the book..... got it at a yard sale for $1 (didn’t wanna pay the full price )
Know your enemy....
> * RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
I think this is exactly why Obama constantly has Jarrett and her crew continuously antagonize the The America People or “the right”. He is trying to force a reaction and wants violence so he can spring his brownshirt surprise army on The People. Just let him get out of office then begin the fun.
I think that would be a great idea. I found several links at you tube, including two by Mark Levin:
Youtube on Rules for Radicals Mark Levin link Part I and Part II
I also remember seeing Beck years ago talking about R4R. Found it here: Glenn Beck on Rules for Radicals
We need to reverse-Alinksy them! Heard via Slyfox: "When Ted Cruz began his campaign (senate campaign or the one he is in right now?) he got copies of the book written by Obama’s guy who master-minded the 2008 election campaign and he had his entire staff read it. Something about all the technicalities that really worked - but not the ideology. Ted is one smart dude. He has figured out the obama-ites the way Ronald Reagan had the commies figured out."
I think you’re right about “hell to pay” Jarrett. Her moves are very calculated for effect.
That doesn’t sound like Alinsky... do you have a link?
She had to announce sometime this week. She rented some space in NYC. When you spend more than $5,000 its starts a clock ticking somewhere in the Federal Election Commission where you have to announce within something like ten days.
Makes me want to throw things at the TV.
To really “come at her” it will cause the media to go nuts. Might be fun to see, but I doubt if anyone will take the gloves off.
I just found the graphic. It is more like of a summation of his ideas.
Good one!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.