Posted on 03/27/2015 10:00:54 AM PDT by IChing
If you have any verifiable evidence other than anonymous rumor, blogs, and other forms of speculation, THAT IT WAS NOT A MUSLIM TERRORIST ATTCK, then please share it with us.
Except that NO Muslim connections have been substantiated by anyone, anywhere. Pay attention. Read, comprehend, and desist from perpetuating the same crap this thread is intended to vet and debunk. If you have something that is verifiably substantiated, by all means post it, but don’t post spurious garbage without credibility.
Apparently, rumor now serves as irrefutable evidence.
http://www.press-report.co.uk/andrea-lubitz-muslim-convert
Multiple articles. You might find something interesting.
Unfortunately the masses of sheeple just swallow whatever floats across their screens....that goes for our side, too...
I remember last summer when the leftists went wild after the shooting in Ferguson, MO. Although many people tried and convicted Officer Wilson based upon mere rumors and speculations, here at FR, the general consensus was that we should wait for all the facts to come in before drawing conclusions. I urge the same restraint here.
Nope. You thought I didn’t research my article? Did you bother to read it?
“....unresolved conflicts in his mind about the sanctity of Western values.”
Clearly, he had a problem with authority, regarding his non-response to the repeated requests of the pilot that he unlock the door, a simple matter of flipping the switch. Also, he had to know that he was taking the lives of 149 others along with him, no different, actually, than a lone shooter standing up in a crowded movie theater and unleashing gunfire on the other unsuspecting patrons of that theater, just a different weapon is all. And the destruction of a highly sophisticated machine whose purpose is to transport a number of individuals from one point to another, shows a total disregard for the property rights of others.
Do I know this for an irrefutable fact? Nobody can really peer into the mind of another, and know their motives, but we can certain look at actions carried out, and infer a great deal. Can we infer motive? Maybe not, but we can sure assess the mischief done.
Yep, I did.
HEY, genius! If you read my article, you’d have found that I’d ALREADY DEBUNKED THAT EXACT SAME CRAP you posted, word-for-word!
Sheesh, why, oh Lord, WHY are people so stupid??
“Unfortunately the masses of sheeple just swallow whatever floats across their screens....that goes for our side, too...”
That would be Selective Perception.
Go take a course in logic and come back if by chance you are able to pass. Sign up for reading comprehension while you’re at it.
You didn’t even read nor check the links in my article, did you? Do you not even realize that just saying something without citing a verifiable source doesn’t equate to substantiation?
“Muslim FRIENDS?
Really?
Hang around EVIL long enough, and it infects you.”
So, if you have a muslim friend, we can now assume that motivates you? What if you have a friend who has a muslim friend?
Soon we’ll be playing “six degrees of radicalization”. Better just to stick with facts we know, I think.
Oh really? Which words, and how do they “prove” it?
Are you even able to discern which words are mine, and which are ones I quoted?
“Only an IDIOT would believe...”
In my experience, people who think that this passes for argument are usually intimately familiar with what idiots believe.
By your logic, I must beat my wife unless I can prove that I don't, and I must have robbed the gas station down the street from my office last night, unless I can prove that I didn't.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.