Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives Are The Real RINO’s
Leo McNeil ^ | January 5, 2015 | Leo McNeil

Posted on 01/05/2015 5:39:04 AM PST by LeoMcNeil

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: mj1234

The Democrat Party has moved so far left that there is a vacuum in the middle of the political spectrum, which the Republicans are rushing to fill. A party of centrists has no place for conservatives. If the present paradigm holds we will need a third party to represent the right and move toward a three party system.


41 posted on 01/05/2015 8:02:08 AM PST by ez (Muslims do not play well with others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: defconw
They only thing I would say and here is the problem. Voting third party guarantees a Democrat will win.

This only true under the present paradigm. What must happen is Conservatives must be able to attract voters from the Democrat side of the aisle like Reagan did. This is where the Libertarian Party has some degree of attraction, as it combines the small government philosophy of the conservatives with the liberal social policy of the Democrats. Rand Paul is not treated very well around here, but he may be onto something with the formula that could be successful in building a coalition party.

42 posted on 01/05/2015 8:17:53 AM PST by ez (Muslims do not play well with others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: moovova; LeoMcNeil

The writer says that the libs aren’t the RINOs, the conservatives are because libs keep getting nominated. But if you look at the party’s platform, it has been conservative. I love your bus analogy. To take your analogy a bit further, the republican party is like a bus line with conservative destination ABC.

The lib RINOs that keep getting nominated are bus drivers don’t want to take the bus to its proper destination. Instead of ABC, they want the destination to be socialist XYZ. They pretend they are good bus drivers who can get the bus to ABC, but as soon as they get behind the wheel they take the bus where they want it to go.

We need to do a better job screening these bus drivers and we need to kick some them off of the bus. Our destination should never be the same as the democrats/socialists.

Unlike what Mitch McConnell (RINO) and his twisted mind thinks, the people voted republican to oppose Obama and the democrats, not to go along with them. If they wanted get along to go along, they would have voted for the democrats.


43 posted on 01/05/2015 8:26:51 AM PST by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil

The Republican Party was founded as the anti-slavery party.

The Democrats were against big government because they were afraid government power would be used to free their slaves.

They were perfectly fine with the government forcing free states to hunt down escaped slaves and return them.


44 posted on 01/05/2015 8:27:21 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil

“Conservatives are the real RINOs”. I’ve been saying this for quite some time now.


45 posted on 01/05/2015 8:50:17 AM PST by zeugma (The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase

I rank Calvin ahead of Reagan on my list of top Presidents. Anyone that fails to recognise Calvin in these types of articles is really missing a great opportunity...


46 posted on 01/05/2015 8:57:55 AM PST by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CSM

Agreed


47 posted on 01/05/2015 9:01:00 AM PST by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ez

Well, I am praying for one.


48 posted on 01/05/2015 9:32:39 AM PST by defconw (If not now, WHEN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Waryone

“but as soon as they get behind the wheel they take the bus where they want it to go.”

Exactly. And, the ones that helped vote them in are sent to the “back of the bus”.

Time to pull the overhead “stop” cord.


49 posted on 01/05/2015 10:31:25 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Pajamajan

If you aren’t going to read the article what’s the point in posting a comment?


50 posted on 01/05/2015 10:50:41 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil

We’re supposed to read the articles? Since when?


51 posted on 01/05/2015 10:52:23 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Pajamajan

Progressive Republicans aren’t Democrats posing as Republicans. In reality, they’re holding true to the founding principles of the GOP.


52 posted on 01/05/2015 10:52:39 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: defconw
Voting third party guarantees a Democrat will win
That threat has become a nice example of intellectual laziness. I can't say as I blame you, it is "low hanging fruit" and the political right is sloppy-drunk with intellectual laziness.

But it presumes those exploring the possibility of a third or replacement party expect a third-party to win it all instantly. I don't know anyone who expects that.

Why can't we have candidates, registered as republicans, who vote as a bloc of conservatives and caucus tightly together? Sort of like other congressional voting blocs (latino, black, women, whatever). Conservatives are (supposedly) minorities too!

Why can't that conservative voting bloc grow over the election seasons until it reached critical mass and public familiarity *AND THEN* declare a new party? Could that new party and the GOP caucus together for the vast majority of things against the Dems? Why does the gradual replacement of the GOP (a thoroughly tainted brand) seem to be so difficult to most folks? It does not have to be as sudden as flipping a light switch.

I'm just an average idiot and I can think of possibilities like that. There are a bunch of folks far smarter than I that could most assuredly develop even better, sound, reasonable, practicable strategies.

The point being, more and more folks don't see much difference between a RINO winning and a Dem winning. If that is their perception, then saying "voting third party guarantees a dem win" is no longer a threat or at worst, a very minimal threat. If conservatives are serious, they should start striking while the iron is hot. They have a lot of MSM sniping to overcome and start building brand recognition.

Plus, repeating that threat is just following the masses and not truly thinking about realistic, plausible possibilities. And here lately on the GOP side of reality, it is a fair bet that if you follow the masses, the "m" becomes silent (see also: Boehner, McConnell, Graham, et al).

53 posted on 01/05/2015 11:27:08 AM PST by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jaydee770
"Why can't that conservative voting bloc grow over the election seasons until it reached critical mass and public familiarity *AND THEN* declare a new party?"

Define conservative, because I'll be damned if I can not on Free Republic that's for sure. This forum can't even agree on a candidate.

54 posted on 01/05/2015 11:43:07 AM PST by defconw (If not now, WHEN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Washington’s office vacancy will go up about 900% if there was a flat tax of 7.5%. Government will be lots smaller...


55 posted on 01/05/2015 12:44:08 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jaydee770

The problem is that there aren’t enough conservative voters to create a sustainable conservative party.


56 posted on 01/06/2015 4:21:57 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: LeoMcNeil
The problem is that there aren’t enough conservative voters to create a sustainable conservative party.

The facts of life are conservative. The majority of voters are conservative. Twice as many self identify as conservative as liberal. Don't believe the commercial/populist hype.

57 posted on 01/06/2015 4:29:06 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Kennedy is not liberal. He sides with the conservatives a lot of the time.


58 posted on 01/06/2015 4:37:01 AM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The facts of life may be conservative, voters might self identify as conservative but that doesn’t mean conservatives are a majority. If conservatives were a majority of voters, Obama wouldn’t have been elected twice and progressives like John McCain and Mitt Romney wouldn’t have won the GOP nomination.


59 posted on 01/06/2015 5:20:23 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: hawkaw

Kennedy is inconsistent. Admittedly, he appears to vote conservative more today than he did during his first 15 years or so on the Supreme Court.


60 posted on 01/06/2015 5:21:17 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson