It's been around for quite a while, back to July 2008, I think:
Posted on 01/27/2014 10:57:01 AM PST by onyx
It's been around for quite a while, back to July 2008, I think:
I CAN imagine how it must have affected you, I went through a dreadful time, foolishly thinking it matters. After a while, you realise it doesn’t matter at all. Take it in good spirit, they harm themselves more than they do you.
I think the crazy weird speculative theories are put forward by Zero’s team to lead people off the scent. After the Gilbert movie (am I remember his name right?), I am sure of it.
Btw, I just looked in the mirror and I’ve got me some jowls too, so how do we get rid of them?
It doesn’t matter Fred and your right.In my case it was slander and to clear my good name I asked a retraction in that person’s freepmail to all the souls that read this.I can honestly say I respond to people directly.Never talk behind their backs and if I report you I tell you.:)There is so much passion in this subject .
A lot of homosexuals have children, especially those who are attempting to hide their orientation. They just aren’t good at sustaining a sexual relationship with a woman over the long haul.
Well I was just responding to the limp post.He had 6 kids.
I’m not clear on your point?
You’ve got to be reading my mind. They know how impressionable people are in general, and have a merry time playing around with us. This time, I feel somewhat responsible. Who was it posted the first mention of Subud on FR after someone sent me the letter from their Seattle office?
Moi did.
Who posted the first photograph of Pak Subud on FR?
Moi did.
The POST December 31:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3107346/posts?q=1&;page=1#1
The excerpt from Subud Letter:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3107346/posts?page=62#62
The photograph of Pak Subuh:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3107346/posts?page=104#104
It only took three comments later for someone to pop up and say he looks like zero:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3107346/posts?page=108#108
It would have happened anyway. But it was just too good for them to pass up, wasn’t it? Takes the heat off what’s really going on, allows them to say ‘look at what the whackos are up to now!’
And why does it happen at all? Because deep inside, even those who maintain they hate and despise conspiracy theories, know very well they do not know who he is or where he came from.
Then Corsi picked it up and off it went, like a firecracker. So now we know where HE gets his ‘news’ from.
I have formed the habit of not addressing you because you can be somewhat deliberately ambiguous and just plain not very nice to communicate with, but what fatima is trying to tell you is that MX had six children.
Officially that is.
No matter how you try to paint the man a homosexual, in modern terms his past just might indicate he was open to a number of opportunities, and that might have made him bi-sexual. Not fussy, get what I mean?
“I have formed the habit of not addressing you”
That is a very good habit. I encourage it.
“I guess that blows the Malcolm Conspiracy”
There’s also the question of sexual orientation. Do a search on ‘Was Malcolm X gay?’. His homosexual activities started young and intensified. He carried on one homosexual relationship for a decade. His wife complained [bitterly] that he couldn’t satisfy her. He became impotent in her presence—an issue never reported re: his manifold homosexual liaisons.”
You said he was limp in her presence and he had 6 kids.
She, Malcolm X’s wife, said he was limp in her presence. She’s the only one who cd make such a claim, as she and X were the only two privy to it. I only mentioned her complaint.
Malcolm X proposed on a telephone call from Detroit in January 1958, and they married two days later.[60][61] They had six daughters: Attallah (b. 1958, named for Attila the Hun);[62][63] Qubilah (b. 1960, named for Kublai Khan);[64] Ilyasah (b. 1962, named for Elijah Muhammad);[65] Gamilah Lumumba (b. 1964, named for Patrice Lumumba);[66] and twins Malikah and Malaak (b. 1965 after their father’s death, and named for him).[67]
http://www.nathanielturner.com/malcolmxletter.htm
Read his four page letter to Elijah Mohammad, it deals with his marriage difficulties.
Considering how much time he spent overseas he did well.
If you reread my post, you’ll see I said that Obama’s unusual raised vertical line on his upper lip was shared with Frank Marshall Davis. I did not say that I thought that Obama looked like FMD aside from that, that lip thing is unusual and seems an inherited trait, not an injury. Unless the woman who gave birth to him or a grandparent also had that unusual characteristic, that would have come from his dad, whoever that was. Obama senior seems out of the question. Malcolm X shared his stature and they have a strong resemblance. Now that the guru from Indonesia has been thrown into the mix, one begins to stagger from staring at the features of these faces for so long. Today it’s so easy to find out who’s related to whom with DNA testing. If Obama does not share a lot of DNA with those other children of Obama Sr and with the other alleged relatives from Kenya, then the story of Obama Sr as Barack’s father come quickly to an end and connections with different sets of families begins.
K.He had 6 kids and I’m sure she didn’t get pregnant ever time they had sex so he must have been up for it once in awhile.
‘As evidence of his assertions, Marable includes a letter from Malcolm X to the Honorable Elijah Muhammad, the leader of the Nation of Islam. In the letter, Malcolm mentions that he and his wife were “sexually incompatible” and that she’d threatened to “seek satisfaction elsewhere.”’
It is Malcolm X and Betty Shabazz who say they had trouble, not me.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-boyce-watkins/malcolm-x-book-rattles-hi_b_846555.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.