Certainly this is something that ought to be monitored.
Fair and balanced is one thing; caving to sodomites is another.
Hannity hasn’t talked about what is happening, with radio or TV, but he says he is happy. What IS going on? Will read this later.
The article doesn’t mention the Shepster, which is odd as he is the most obvious of the bunch.
I will not watch Kelly. You might as well have ‘The Alan Colmes Show’ with frequent guest Mizz Maddow.
I have no doubt in my mind that the homosexual advocates on FOX are cheering the murder of Christians in Syria by McCain’s pals.
O’Reilly is as always, a moron. He recently stated “I’m not religious, but I attend church every Sunday”.
If she “caters” to the Sodomites then her show will FAIL!
read
Sodomite Fox News can burn along with ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN in fifth-column hell.
OK EVERYONE get it “Straight” Fox News was/is/and never will be a “Conservative” outfit. It just that ALL of the MSM were so BAD and Leftist that Fox News in comparison LOOKED
“Conservative”.
During the 2012 election, Megyn looked like a deer in the headlights. It was obvious that she really was not so much into who won as she was about Megyn on TV. All the MSM newsreaders were partisan democrats. Fair and Balanced would therefore require a bit of a conservative edge. We got that with Hannity; we won’t with Megyn. I will no longer watch during this time period. No interest in Gretta. Can only take BOR for short periods. I’m out.
Hey Sean, GET OUT OF THE WAY!!! Queen Megyn had a baby, wants her work schedule changed and that requires that YOU suffer the consequences. Hannity should sue Fox for their preferential treatment to females because they have babies then make demands.
Hannity is a mental midget, to be sure, but a decent guy who stands for decency and morality. Kelly is an open advocate for LGBT indoctrination, and I fully expect every debate on that issue to be swayed by her bias. FoxNews can no longer be considered a family-safe channel.
I saw a post yesterday on FR that had a picture that showed Megyn Kelly, I think, at a gay event. If this is indeed true, and Fox News is going homosexual (there is nothing gay about being a pervert), then they will be forever be crossed off my list as a preferred channel to watch.
More Nazification of America!
FNC has always been left wing. Don’t fool yourself.
Fox News is just another sewer pipe that’s fed from the same toilet as the rest of the Democrat newsrooms.
Does a Journal... have a sex? Answer: No and there should not be a sexual preference organization for people who claim to be “journalists” ie. people who report news... without an agenda of any kind. News.. period.
Bottom line I stopped listening to Fox two weeks ago, I could simply no longer stomach their programs. I'm sure others feel the same.
I think this segment needs to be be read in every venue across the nation:
Long-term Consequences: The Decline of American Civilization Young and old people alike – and “opinion leaders” of the sort that appear on Fox News every day – need to go deeper on the issue of homosexuality and understand that the societal embrace of sexual immorality (of all types) brings about the downfall of civilizations – and America will be no exception. Brian Fitzaptrick writes:
To understand the danger posed by homosexual “marriage,” you must join the great scholars in asking some fundamental questions. Why do some civilizations flourish? Why do others perish?
Perhaps the definitive work on the rise and fall of civilization was written back in the thirties by an Oxford anthropologist. In Sex and Culture, a study of 86 human civilizations ranging from Rome to Tahiti, J.D. Unwin found that a society’s destiny is tied inseparably to the limits it imposes on sexual expression. They highest levels of social development are reached only by cultures that practice what Unwin called “absolute monogamy,” in which marriage is limited to one man and one woman, sexual outside marriage is not tolerated, and divorce is prohibited.
Absolute monogamy promotes cultural growth by solving what anthropologist Margaret Mead termed the “central problem of every society,’ to “define appropriate roles for men.” Monogamous civilizations require men to choose either lifelong celibacy or the responsibilities of a husband: fidelity, breadwinning, and fatherhood. Most marry, to their good fortune, because married men tend to be healthier, happier, and more productive than bachelors. Joseph Schumpeter, the great economist, attributes the success of capitalism not to the entrepreneur’s lust for money or status, but to his love of family. The central pillar of any healthy civilization is the self - sacrificing married man who doesn’t spend his income on himself, but prefers “to work and save primarily for wife and children.”
Civilizations cease to grow, found Unwin, within two to three generations after retreating from absolute monogamy. Moral standards erode when a society’s members chafe at the discipline imposed by monogamy, and begin to gratify their personal impulses without regard for the consequences inflicted on others. According to sociologist Robert Nisbet, “What sociologists are prone to call social disintegration is really nothing more than the spectacle of a rising number of individuals playing fast and loose with other individuals in relationships of trust and responsibility.
If individualistic selfishness and self - seeking are not checked, Harvard sociologist Pitirim Sorokin warns us, a society will lapse into “sexual anarchy.” In The American Sex Revolution , Sorokin wrote that “both men and society are degraded” as a culture becomes “sexually obsessed.” “The members of such a society are habituated to look at the opposite sex as a mere instrument for pleasure...to these individuals, talk of human dignity, religious and moral commandments, and rules of decency is just bosh...the society degrades the values of womanhood and manhood, of motherhood and fatherhood, of childhood and venerable age, of marriage and family, and even of love itself.” Divorce, desertion, and deviance become commonplace, when “what used to be considered morally reprehensible is now recommended as a positive value; what was once called demoralization is now styled moral progress and a new freedom.” Sorokin describes this as “moral schizophrenia.”....
Such selfish, undisciplined societies meet ugly fates. In his Social and Cultural Dynamics, Sorokin studied 1,623 “internal disturbances in Greco-Roman and European history,” and found that sexual permissiveness almost always precedes or accompanies “an explosion of sociopolitical disturbances.” Unwin found that every society, without exception, that rejects absolute monogamy either becomes a stagnant cultural backwater or collapses altogether.
What does all this mean for homosexuality and “gay marriage”? No sector of our society is more obsessed with sex, or more promiscuous, than the homosexual subculture. To accept the practice of homosexuality is to make irresponsible sexual behavior easier for our society. To permit homosexual relationships to be formalized is to establish a dangerous precedent that people may form sexual unions outside the healthy one - man, one - woman framework. In effect, we’d be rejecting Unwin’s “absolute monogamy” model for good, because rights are very difficult to withdraw once they’ve been granted.
What of Mead’s “central problem” in society, defining the duties of the male? Homosexuality does nothing to channel men into the husband/father/provider role that so benefits society. Male homosexuality entices men away from that role, by offering a sexual outlet with no strings attached .... Lesbianism eliminates male responsibility altogether....
According to Unwin “the historical evidence [suggests] that homosexuality is a habit that appears in a society ... that has been absolutely monogamous, and is relaxing.” If Unwin is correct, then the increasing prominence of homosexuality in our culture confirms ominously that America has strayed too far from the straight and narrow morality that invigorates cultures. To give homosexual couples the right to marry would be like taking another giant, virtually irrevocable step down the road to sexual anarchy and cultural ruin.
Fox News - The Missing White Girl Channel