Posted on 12/28/2012 10:03:18 AM PST by Errant
Why do DemoQuack politicians want to punish law-abiding citizens who represent the overwhelming majority of gun owners for the evil actions of a distinct few?
Do we outlaw alcohol because some people choose to drink and drive which results in thousands of deaths? Or do we just prosecute and hold accountable those who drink and drive?
The DemoQuacks just don’t like law-abiding citizens holding guns, and are seeking once again to exploit a tragedy to further their agenda. Sickening.
I’m not sure about “revolution.” I do believe that the nascent “peaceful secessionist movement” and/or the state’s rights “nullification movement” will get a big boost. I’m not sure either one of those adds up to revolution, though.
“both sides had muskets and cannons back then.
weapon wise now there is no contest.”
True.
However, numbers-wise there, also, is no contest. ;)
DiFi needs her face rubbed in the fact that liberal judges, freeing dangerous criminals are to blame.
Along with a society that refuses to properly address mental illness, preferring to pretend that anti-psychotic drugs are sufficient.
80% of the mass shooters in the last 50 years have been on these drugs.
first, you have to get over your revulsion at murdering unarmed women and children, and the elderly, in the enemy's ranks.
you don't need much more than cooking oil and old rags to pull that off 'cause fire still works.
Make your plans and preparations. Do not be so foolish as to let it be known what they are. The unconstitutional fools in government can see in general what is happening - record sales of non-perishable food, water, firearms, ammunition. They’re stupid socialists, but they’re not stupid.
If Iran can bring one down. So can we.
I see at as the opposite of the "get out of jail free card".
If officials so choose, they can lock up almost any conservative that they want.
It will also be a registry of people and weapons that are available for pickup at their discretion. I assume registered gun owners will have to notify government of any movements of the owner or the weapon.
My question is will we be required to wear a yellow star and with the words "gun owner" and will they tattoo a number on our arms?
You're right of course. The problem for liberty lovers is how to go about it. It must be done at the local and state government levels and national organizations (i.e., NRA). Unfortunately, local govermnents now receive most of their funding and equipment from the feds.
If a revolution were to come it would be the blue states against the red ones for the most part,
not just the north aginst the south.
I’d bet on the red.
Us country boys know a thing or two bout hunting.
I think today he would tell us, You initiated a policy to tolerate the Marxist-Alinsky radicals and let them rant; not only has it not ceased but was constantly augmented by decades of infiltration and indoctrination. You now have two Americas.
The ruling class New Normal:
Did you ever meet any of these clowns in person? I have. They’re not right in the head.
What will they do when they don't find any? Keep coming back? We could play this game for years.
When will those other imbeciles realize that compromising with evil is akin to adding just a little sewage to your drinking water? It becomes polluted.
Thanks for sharing that.
By the time the mid-terms start to roll around, the Left will still be engaged in the “conversation”, looking for all the world like reasonable “moderates” who have only the public interest in mind. To push new expanded gun laws, and get them passed (do they think they can pull off an “over, under, around,and through”
like they did Obamacare?, BEFORE then will unleash a renewed Tea Party awakening, but that too could be on their Agenda, which seems now totally committed to go “all in” on EVERY
front. The overall objective is to demonize your political opponents at every turn. It goes without saying that if enormous numbers of guns manage to get confiscated, we’ll see, just like in Australia, an increasing number of homicides, rapes, robberies, etc. committed by criminals who
will never give up the most precious tool in their toolbag, which is a gun.The guns of criminals then become their own
“Peacemaker”, like the original Colt .45 in the Old West.
It makes “peace” because the only recourse an unarmed victim has without a gun to protect himself will be roll over and allow himself to be victimized, IOW, to submit “peacefully”.
But , going forward, will we ever get an honest debate about this? Considering how the moderate Wayne LaPierre has already been vilified by daring to come out and utter commonsensical defenses of the 2nd Amendment position, I wouldn’t bet on it.The MSM won’t allow it.
And I say all the above as someone who doesn’t own a gun and probably never will.
Feinstein’s gun control bill will go to committee where it will die just like her previous bills.
Didn’t work for the Germans when Hitler sent out his henchmen to take them up and it won’t work here when obama sends his henchmen out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.