This is incorrect. Kim Screen on her blog identifies the French Club image as "1958". This likely identifies the year of the yearbook, 1958, which would be Stanley Ann's sophmore year. Hope this helps.
Posted on 06/11/2012 5:41:04 AM PDT by plenipotentiary
Right click and save all those screencaps!
You can see some names on some of em.
Oh really? I copied directions on how to do screencaps yesterday but it was for Vista. I’m a techtard...
oops, meant to say rightclick on the pix posted here...
Would love to know how to save vids using Linux
Barack Sr *did* speak to a class at Punahou actually, when he showed up around Christmas 1970 after J E Hoover had died and the FBI file on F M Davis was finally closed.
I wouldn't be surprised if Barry took at least one year off between 5th and 12th grade, maybe a semester in Kenya, maybe he he went to San Francisco as an Indonesian exchange student. He may have been boarding at Punahou as a foreign Kenyan student for a while. I think any of this possible and if it were true I don't think the Punahou community would be talking about it.
You know something that is false? How is that? How many other false things do you "know"?
, she had to be there so she could graduate in 1960 and go to Hawaii to meet the black Kenyan native
She did? Why did she have to be there? What does this photo have to do with whether or not she fell in love with Barack Sr? Explain.
you don't know the origin of that image. You don't. But I do.
I think I understand why you might say that.
Because more information is better. With some information missing, yo could have a BS artist make stuff up about it.
What is the origin of the image? You seem sure it was photoshopped. Who photoshopped it? From what sources? Did you photoshop it? Why did you photoshop it? Is this a true thing you know, or another false thing you "know"?
Here is her blog post with the two images.
As far as I can tell she has provided no more context -- like the rest of the photo, the rest of the yearbook page, the captions, etc. And the images you've posted to the thread are the same as on her blog. Have you independently followed up to obtain more context such as the rest of the photo, the rest of the yearbook page, the captions, etc. ? If so, what information is there?
This is incorrect. Kim Screen on her blog identifies the French Club image as "1958". This likely identifies the year of the yearbook, 1958, which would be Stanley Ann's sophmore year. Hope this helps.
You are an amazing researcher. I find your comments on the thread extremely helpful.
Do you have any interest in investigating the claim that Stanley Ann did or didn’t graduate from Mercer Island HS? I looked into it and found what appeared to be overwhelming evidence that she did, so for me personally the matter is resolved. Probably for those who do not believe she graduated Mercer HS, no amount of evidence would suffice, so perhaps you needn’t waste your time.
Thanks for your posts anyway; they are impressive to say the least.
Could you cite, please? What issue? What did the cover look like? It appears this is something pulled from straight from your imagination.
Fred has given us a copy of a reprint;
If that is indeed the article you are referring to, it is an Associated Press article. It is not from Time magazine. Hence, there is no Time magazine cover. This cover you are seeing in your mind's eye is something that was invented by your imagination and that you have now confused with reality. You may want to check your other premises to see if you are confusing other things from your imagination with things from reality.
The version he told the interviewer
There isn't a direct quote, so it's hard to say what exactly he said and what the reporter guessed/made up from his notes.
The version he told the interviewer is that the prevailing view of when he went to Indonesia was not well understood
This is not a clear sentence. What are you trying to say here?
Spring quarter, 1963), Stanley starts school at the U of Hawaii and goes there until she goes to Indonesia in 1966--Barry completely absent from the record anywhere in the interim.
There is a picture of Barry in a kindergarten class in Hawaii at some point during those years. IIRC, there is also a statement from a Hawaii education department that his public school records were "lost." The latter isn't a record per se but a record of a record. The "lost" record probably contained some kind of birth information.
Read this old article by David Maraniss and compare it to the claims he now makes in his new book about Obama. Funny how things change. Reviewers currently credit MARANISS with finding records that Stanley Ann left Hawaii for Seattle within weeks of “her” child’s birth. And yet this older article repeats the lie that Senior left his wife and child behind in Hawaii when he left for Harvard 2 years after the birth: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/22/AR2008082201679.html?sid=ST2008082201770 The articl mentions the high school girlfriends, too.
Without a genuine birth certificate, you don’t know his birth date or the name of his parents.Or where he was born, for that matter.
So why assume she was his mother? Have you ever seen a photograph of the baby zero with a mother?
Yes, too bad...it’s the same smoke and mirrors as the factcheck photography of a forged Colb. It’s all done with snippets and shadows and not one single full page or anything that shows a date.
The only people who would believe the video content are those who want to or need to believe.
You sound like a raving lunatic.
You got that right...chuckle
What is the origin of the image? You seem sure it was photoshopped. Is this a true thing you know, or yet another false thing you delusionally claim to “know”? Who photoshopped it? From what sources? Did you photoshop it? If so, why did you photoshop it?
Why would he not post the information on this thread where it could be easily crossreferenced?
Do you have something new to show us?
That information is new to this thread. Now that it is here, others cannot as easily confuse the issue.
I am now under the impression that they are all counting on people having the attention span of gnats and the memories of blind moles that live in tunnels underground.
To a certain extent, Maraniss and Gilbert for example, are counting on that. They can claim ‘discoveries’ we discussed four years ago.
Who remembers the ATLAS SHRUGS article:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/10/how-could-stanl.html
....and the original ‘discovery’ of the exotic images of an UNNAMED girl, presented to the world as Stanley Ann Dunham, without any identification; simply on the basis of a slight resemblance? Images that were shown on a site, NOW WIPED, that I traced such a long time ago...FREE-VINTAGE-PORN.COM.
New and recent members show up on these threads filled with righteous indignation as if every word they utter is something new. Tiresome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.