Posted on 03/02/2012 1:20:32 PM PST by NYer
MO Rep. Stacey Newman Proposes Bill to Restrict Vasectomies, here you can compare your thought process to that of Rush. I think he makes a good point ... the dems realize the abortion issue is no longer effective so they have to switch to something else ... contraception ... to make the republican candidates look like fools.
This is going to be their big play throughout the campaign...Republicans hate women...that’s it, that’s their election plan.
George Stepawhatshisface at the ABC debate spent six minutes talking about contraception...Diane Sawyer followed with more of the same...the candidates and audience could not believe what they were hearing. Good Ol’ George, Clinton Butt-Boy...now Obama’s man set this up.
Three weeks later the war on the Catholic church started...and the msm was in full cry...”Republicans hate women”...this is just the start.
Im still waiting for Obama to call me and ask me I’m OK..Ive dealt with the left calling me a teabagger, a racist, an idiot, and other disgusting names for 3+ years..Hey Obama, if you want to call me, line is open, I’m all ears
I bet Billy boy called her too. On the one cell phone Hillary doesn’t know he has.
And then Bill Clinton called her to see if she’s available.
‘This is about expanding the reach and power of government into your womb, if you’re a woman. This is about the Democrat Party wanting more and more control over you. What was early feminism all about? Emancipation, individuality, freedom, liberation, all of these things. Now here comes Danica Patrick out and she says, “I’m perfectly comfortable letting the government make my health decisions for me.” Well, folks, I’m gonna tell you: Right there, that’s the death and the end of feminism.’
Excellent point except what Misses Fluke and Patrick want is not the death and end of feminism. The founder of late 20th century feminism, Betty Friedan, was a complete and total communist while Gloria Steinem is on record as saying capitalism and patriarchy need to be overthrown. Feminism and collectivism/statism/communism/socialism go completely together. The goal of having both mom and dad work is for the children to be raised by the state in government run day care. As National Review wrote way back when it was a good magazine, feminists have decided that women’s hearts no longer belong to daddy but to the state. The state is the replacement for women’s husbands in feminist theory.
That is the money quote. Repeat, preach it, and mock her. She is going to school at Georgetown, a very prestigious law school, and whores around so much that she can't afford her own contraception. So I have to pay for it by force of law. I have to pay for her desire to be a slut. So she is obviously not able to control her own impulses, and she wants to be lawyer? She can't keep her hormones under control, and wants to have any and all responsibility removed? She is 30 years old, and has the mentality of a spoiled child?
Stop being nice. The script is set, don't follow it. She has testified before Congress that she is such a slut, she can't afford a $9 a month birth control.
Play the Alinsky rules right back at them. Make a personal issue. Shame her, embarrass her, and her family. If that was my kid, I would be holding press conference, but not to say how proud I am.
It looks like the Left are circling the wagons around the contraception issue. They don’t tell you but contraception means for them, anything to terminate a life. This is just the Culture of Death which puts the relationship between a man and a woman on the level of mutual masterbation instead of the procreation of children in the bounds of marriage. There is the issue of freedom here. Got it folks?
probably the only good thing we can say about Obama is, he didn’t ask for her phone number. He doesn’t roll that way ;-)
At least he, of all the men who call Sandra, wasn’t interested in sex with her.
I’m glad to see a lot of women aren’t buying into this circus. $3000 for BC over 3 years?!! What the hell is she doing? Running around like a cat in heat? Every day? It makes not sense. But Rush is right, this a Leftist play for Obamacare and power and control.
The only way it will work is if enough clueless women believe it. Sadly, many are eating it up including some I know who should know better.
Can't post the following to the forum but it is quite revealing ...
Amazing: HHS Head Sebelius Says that Morning After Pill is Not Abortafacient
Rush was right, and Republican candidates and leaders put on their idiot boots, and waded right into the trap. Republicans are going to have to learn how to define the subjects they debate. This nonsense is about two things. First it is about whether or not Congress has the right to dictate moral policy to churches and religious institutions. For years, the left has convoluted the so called, separation clause, into something unrecognizable from its original intent. It had nothing to do with limiting the influence of church or religion on government policy, but it did deny government the power to mandate a denomination of religion. The Founders were smart enough to understand that the offending party that needed to be limited was government, not religion. Liberals have turned it around ass backwards, saying government can dictate moral policy to religious institutions, but religious institutions can’t interfere with government by objecting to or resisting government mandates. This is a teaching opportunity for Republicans to demonstrate how the Constitution should be interpreted, and how it is capable of addressing a modern issue by applying the original principles of the Founders. Government is clearly overstepping its bounds.
The next issue is whether or not government has the right to tell taxpayers they must pay for the birth control of others, essentially subsidizing their sex. Government is taking powers not enumerated too far. As both a taxpayer and someone with a superior moral conscience compared to government, I don’t want to pay for birth control pills, morning after pills and abortions, so others can enjoy irresponsible sex, or even responsible sex. More than that, I don’t believe the government should have the right to force me to do so. Republican leaders should put take the debate where it belongs.
As you attend Georgetown law school....you have to pay for the $59k tuition, books and room/board. If you don’t like their on-campus apartments....figure around $8k a year to share a decent place in the DC area. Regular pocket money per year, for your Starbucks coffee, pizza, fancy clothing, and fun? Toss in another $9k. So you need $70k a year, and you whine about $200k a year for birth control? Just your pens and notebooks run $100 a year. Figure your Starbucks coffee runs around $1500 a year. Figure your virus software for the laptop at $50 a year. And figure all the pizza you eat for the year at $2000.
And they worry about $200 in birth control? Something doesn’t make sense here.
Note, I live in the Arlington area and come across an occasional Georgetown student. They all wear their university sweat-shirts ($60 each), and most look like they grew up in Boston, Philly or New York. I really can’t think of any reason why I’d ever call upon a Georgetown lawyer to get me out of trouble.
That "right" is so sacred that third parties have to be coerced by government to paying for it under penalty of law. It's so sacred that they'll throw free speech, freedom of religion, the right to assemble, ANYTHING over the side of the boat in order to preserve it. They'll justify the cold-blooded murder of innocent kids before, during, and after birth to preserve it.
They are truly despicable. It is the shame of this nation that the American people don't drive them from office with torches and pitchforks.
I wish Rush was reading this forum. You hit it out of the park by touching on the core of the problem here!
The Left has its secular religion. Its purpose is a derivative of the Founding Principle, "the pursuit of happiness," which is in their catechism, the pursuit of pleasure. Of course, that means sex as a recreational sport.
What this issue is really about is the institution of marriage. It is about the natural relationship between a man and a woman as defined by God and nature. This relationship has existed since man required an extended period for the protection and development of children. The third-century Roman jurist, Modestinus, captured the common understanding of marriage with the following definition: “Marriage is the union of a man and a woman, a consortium for the whole of life involving the communication of divine and human rights.” This union and these rights exist, not merely for their own sake, but also and especially for the sake of the inter-generational concerns of progeny and property; with a view, that is, to the conditions necessary for the founding and flourishing of the family. The rights involved are divine as well as human because marriage is generative, and hence pre- as well as pro-political; because what is founded through marriage is, in the twentieth-century language of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, “the natural and fundamental group unit of society.”
What the Left is doing through same sex marriage (and this contraception ruse) is to de-naturalize the family by rendering familial relationships as policy relationships, defined and imposed by the state. Human beings pursue relationships, not for their natural destany of parenthood, but to use each other as objects of masbatory pleasure. Contraception (the ending of life) is the means for that ends. In doing so, it effectively makes every citizen a ward of the state, by turning his or her most fundamental human connections into legal constructs at the state’s subjective whim.
Bingo. Presidential elections are always about the record of the incumbent. In order for Obama to get re-elected, his stenographers/videographers in the media have to pull out all the stops to deflect attention from the Kenyan Marxist's abysmal record in office.
The "War On Women's Health" is just the first act. Expect many, many more.
Will hard working gays have to pay for breeder contraception?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.