Skip to comments.
Rick Santorum is no Conservative Savior, sez troll before getting the ZOT
Dissenting Opinions ^
| 01/07/2012
| jwpegler
Posted on 01/08/2012 10:41:37 AM PST by octapi
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: octapi
Troll... Rick Santorum would be a GREAT POTUS/VPOTUS. I’m going RP/RS as the tiket.
41
posted on
01/08/2012 2:21:36 PM PST
by
ExCTCitizen
(If we stay home in November '12, don't blame 0 for tearing up the CONSTITUTION!!)
To: joe fonebone
10th amendment... read it... understand it... or go to a totaltarian country... The Tenth Amendment speaks of powers. Legitimate powers, of the national government, the state governments, and of the people.
None of the three have any legitimate power or jurisdiction to alienate the God-given, unalienable rights of any person. They never have and they never will.
The views you espouse, which demonstrate a complete misunderstanding of the Tenth Amendment, and ignorance concerning natural rights, have been propagated widely by Ron Paul. It's a deadly disease in the body politic, quite frankly.
This republic was premised on an understanding of the self-evident truths concerning the natural equal rights of the people.
You probably don't realize it, but by following Ron Paul on these things, you're helping to destroy those foundations.
The irony of your post is that the mark of totalitarianism is that they have no respect whatsoever for the God-given, unalienable equal rights of the individual.
To: onyx
Santorum voted against "Right to Work" legislation while in the Senate and supported that degenerate scumbag Arlen Specter over Pat Toomey.
Those are completely indefensible and unacceptable actions.
He is also a lawyer.
He is done after New Hampshire.
43
posted on
01/08/2012 4:25:34 PM PST
by
Rome2000
(OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
To: joe fonebone; wagglebee
So a country which forbids murder in every state is a totalitarian country, since it would not allow any state to legally murder people?
44
posted on
01/08/2012 4:32:11 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
To: wagglebee
I am not a Paul supporter, the guy looks to me like he is one step ahead of the guys with the butterfly nets and a straight jacket.
On Iran getting a nuke, it’s a non-issue, it’s too late, the Taliban already have nukes via their puppet government in Pakistan, not sure how Iran getting their own is going to make that situation any worse.
All of this saber rattling about Irans nuke is just the military industrial complexes way off staving off big cuts to the defense budget.
Pakistan is a nuclear power and Taliban insurgents were within 60 miles of the capital and seizing control in 2009.
They had to back off because we were still a heavy presence in Iraq and Afghanistan and sent that degenerate Hillary Clinton over to tell the government to make pretend they were fighting back.
OBL was living in the Pakistani equivalent of West Point.
Pretty soon the charade will be over, and AlQueda will take direct control of all of the Pakistani nukes.
Iran is not going to do anything to challenge the US navy, its all propaganda
45
posted on
01/08/2012 4:38:46 PM PST
by
Rome2000
(OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
To: EternalVigilance
Great Post!
46
posted on
01/08/2012 4:40:45 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Rome2000
That's all well and good, but the FACT still remains that Paul is pro-abortion AND believes in appeasing America's enemies (and appeasement is exactly what Paul would be doing by abandoning Israel).
47
posted on
01/08/2012 4:45:22 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: octapi; darkwing104; 50mm; Old Sarge; 230FMJ; A.Hun; abigailsmybaby; AFPhys; Aircop_2006; ...
One and done for octapi. ZOT!

To be added or removed from the Viking Kitty/ZOT Ping List, FReepmail Darkwing104 or 50mm.
48
posted on
01/08/2012 4:46:59 PM PST
by
50mm
(Trust nobody and you'll never be disappointed.)
To: onyx
Click
49
posted on
01/08/2012 4:49:58 PM PST
by
RedMDer
(Forward With Confidence!)
To: octapi; 50mm
50
posted on
01/08/2012 4:52:45 PM PST
by
RedMDer
(Forward With Confidence!)
To: octapi
51
posted on
01/08/2012 4:57:41 PM PST
by
Earthdweller
(Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
To: onyx
52
posted on
01/08/2012 4:59:19 PM PST
by
Earthdweller
(Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
To: RedMDer
53
posted on
01/08/2012 5:00:17 PM PST
by
Earthdweller
(Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
To: Rome2000
Santorum had a very good, very sincere explanation for the “right to work” vote in the debate yesterday.
Guessing you missed it, since you were busy finding anti-Santorum talking points to post for today.
To: EternalVigilance
55
posted on
01/08/2012 5:06:23 PM PST
by
abigailsmybaby
("To understan' the livin', you got ta commune wit' da dead." Minerva)
To: EternalVigilance
56
posted on
01/08/2012 5:07:40 PM PST
by
Earthdweller
(Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
To: Earthdweller
Trust me..I’m hard pressed to go with the Romans..but it’s freedom baby. Freedom is freedom. Freedom for you, freedom for me, freedom for them. Don’t eat my freedom.
57
posted on
01/08/2012 5:10:37 PM PST
by
Earthdweller
(Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
To: abigailsmybaby; wagglebee
Thanks to both of you.
The extreme irony is that if you think Ron Paul’s pro-choice for states views all the way through to their logical conclusions, you discover that Paul is a statist, by definition: One who puts the “rights” of the state ahead of the rights of the individual or the people.
To: EternalVigilance
Paul and his followers are completely wed to the idea that states have "rights" and don't seem to mind the fact that the other time in our nation's history where people were talking about states having "rights" it was also to further the notion that states could nullify individual rights by defining groups of people as non-persons.
59
posted on
01/08/2012 5:19:54 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: FightThePower!; Admin Moderator
Why do I get the feeling you are the same person who posted this thread?! make a new account to throw crap...
Please check the IP
60
posted on
01/08/2012 5:21:38 PM PST
by
Bikkuri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson