Herman Cain is Reckless and Arrogant

Rick Perry Report ^ | Nov 1, 2011 | Joe Hyde

[Allegra]

“naswer” = “answer”

Yeesh....time for bed.

[fightinJAG]

ICYMI, you might find this article about the workplace and payoffs interesting:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2800937/posts

[AmericanInTokyo]

Para Espanol, imprime el numero uno. Press Two for English.

"The Obama Campaign sincerely THANKS YOU VERY MUCH, Mr. Hyde, for the great "oppos" on to-be GOP Nominee Herman Cain.

This will indeed come in handy in the Fall of 2012 and for our Great Leader's reelection. Thanks!! Circular firing squad by the GOP. Lovin it!

And of course, suffice it to say, The Gipper thanks you from the Afterlife for so fastidiously adhering to his Republic 11th Commandment, all the for sake of the machiavellian salivation of power instead of accentuating your own guy's positives. Texas attack dog-style. Great Job there Mr. Hyde. But OF COURSE "Radar on. Fox One" (sic)." All that is missing in this feckless, useless article with a shelf life of a fart in an Antarctic windstorm, is a co-authorship from Dr. Jekyll.

[fightinJAG]

So what.

That happens EVERY DAY in the business world (in the civil service workplace, too).

It means NOTHING in terms of Mr. Cain’s conduct or character.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2800937/posts

[hocndoc]

I was a Ford supporter in 1976. The Dems said things about the police and soldiers that I knew wasn’t true. So I was a Republican, even then.

But Clinton is orders of magnitude worse than Gore or Carter. The reason we have this Board is because of the work that Jim and a small group were doing to expose Clinton.

[fightinJAG]

Cain has no record at all. We just don’t know, do we?

Are you serious?

Apart from his record in business, which, yes, can be looked up and upon which people who worked with him can comment, Cain has a huge archive of weekly columns and talk radio transcripts that detail his thoughts, philosophy and proposed action on the full array of political issues.

We've probably never had a candidate in history whose actual analyses are archived in a contemporaneous way.

You're statement would be like saying Rush Limbaugh had no record from which we could evaluate how he would approach problems facing our country.

FACEPALM.

[TBP]

There is good reason to suspect Mitt, Allegra. Cain’s successor at the Restaurant Association is a Romney donor. But Perry would benefit too. (The idea is that he’d pick up the Not-Romney vote.)

Nonetheless, the article that led off this thread is nasty and scurrilous — and unsubstantiated. Somebody is very afraid of Cain.

[TBP]

I was a Reagan supporter in 1976.

[fightinJAG]

I can’t remember seeing this many “comment removed” on a thread in . . .well, ever.

[AmericanInTokyo]

Let’s kick the tires and light the fires.

[fightinJAG]

I know of one “sexual harassment” complaint that consisted of a woman taking offense that she was not included in a company golf outing. She did not play golf.

[fightinJAG]

Laughable.

[fightinJAG]

No, it doesn’t matter, and I don’t mean that in a smartypants way.

People like who they like. If they don’t like someone, great speeches, townhalls, whatever . . . you are right, it makes no difference.

There are people on this thread saying they just don’t like something about Cain. It happens.

And it happens to the other guy, too.

[fightinJAG]

I think we should all stop talking about. (After this thread. lol)

[fightinJAG]

Oh, good grief.

How in the world are you going to be able to “look at all the facts” after all this time?

This is exactly why there are STATUES OF LIMITATIONS in legal cases: because there’s a time after which allowing people to proceed from their memories is so fraught with mistakes and even deception that the law just says “too bad.” “You can’t bring or reopen the case.”

I can’t believe conservatives, regardless of who they are supporting, would wish this circus and debacle — which will accomplish absolutely nothing that is real or reliable — upon the conservative base as we are trying to get a nominee.

Again, if you think the fact that a complaint was made against Mr. Cain and that, even though it was investigated, found unsubstantiated, closed and the women paid off to shut up and get the hell out, the mere fact of the complaint is a ding on Cain’s conduct or character, you’re certainly welcome to the opinion and to vote accordingly.

But please don’t play into the Left’s hands by advocating the full Monty celebrity crime treatment here. That’s just not helpful (and worse).

[fightinJAG]

Who says there has to be more?

People have every right to say that’s enough for them to make a decision.

No different than someone saying this or that about one of the other candidates is enough for them.

You can offer a substantive analysis of why a poor debate performance doesn’t predict a candidate’s performance as president. But it’s still legitimate for someone to conclude that, yes, it does.

[fightinJAG]

Man.

That sounds like something copied off of one of the Palin threads.

[fightinJAG]

This is just arrogant.

It’s no different than those people reading a NYT column and then saying they can evaluate better than the Supreme Court whether the evidence meets the legal standard to impose the death penalty.

[fightinJAG]

A “sex scandal”?

Hey, thanks for singing loud in the Liberal media chorus.

[fightinJAG]

Oh, it’s just how the Left and their trial lawyer buddies want it.