Posted on 06/09/2011 1:51:48 PM PDT by rxsid
Exactly. McEvil and the GOP was playing us and didn't want the election. That was crystal clear the moment McEvil stated we shouldn't be "afraid" of Obama or "scared" of his presidency and denied he is a muslim. The minute he said that, my chest tightened and I knew my suspicions were correct. The GOP went out of their way to find some unknown woman who talked funny, who was far removed from what they thought was middle America, and who was carrying a ton of baggage to be the VP. They didn't count on us falling in love with her so they (yes, the GOP) shut her up and hid her from the cameras. Then, imo, they instigated many of the scandals and law suits to throw the election to the RATs. They would have done anything not to take this election because of the housing bubble burst, the job losses, and the crashing economy. Because of this, I blame the GOP more than the RATs.
both sets of hands are different, as well as the wrinkles in the shirts. The photographs were probably from a group of different poses taken at a studio.
Possibly. I have a poorer eye than most when it comes to photos (which is why I rarely comment), but I still think whatever changes we see came from photoshopping. Nothing below the waist moves (except the hands). “Mark’s” torso looks thicker.
“Mark’s” head is definitely photoshopped from another photo. I question if it even could have come from the same photo session. FN seems to think only a portion of “David’s” head is photoshopped. I even question that.
I guess, in the end, the most important question I have is, Do you think the “before” and “after” pictures of “Mark” are both the same boy? I have a doubt.
The boy on the right - the bigger boy - has a different boy’s head in the photoshopped version. No doubt about it IMO. The other boy - smaller one - has photoshopped lips at the very least.
BTW after going to Mark’s site I had a few weird attacks on my computer, Norton caught them though. Be careful anyone who goes there.
I agree. Not the same boy IMO (but then again I am such a poor photo judge, lol).
~~~~~~~~
Fred Nerks: ALERT!!! from little jeremiah:
“BTW after going to Mark’s site I had a few weird attacks on my computer, Norton caught them though. Be careful anyone who goes there.”
The boy on the left, the darker boy, IS the same boy!
And thanks for the virus warning.
WHOOPS! I don’t know my left from my right.
THE DARK BOY ON THE RIGHT = SAME BOY!
thanks for your comments, help and patience, I am going to be ‘missing’ for a while, we have finally found a caretaker/house-sitter to look after our livestock and are off on a holiday.
There’s a message on my home page showing where we are heading off to.
Of course I’ll be taking my lap-top and will try to respond to any messages...but some parts of ‘Tassie’ are pretty wild, and it may not always be possible.
Keep up the good work - good wishes and good luck!
“off on a holiday.”
How wonderful for you to have an opportunity to replenish body, mind, and soul. I hope you don’t check in too often, lol; that would defeat the purpose of the holiday.
The same boy, then, just lightened up a bit and ‘shopped.
FN, I’m with thouworm - hardly check in at all! Forget all this stuff for a while.
“It’s just a fading, passing show”.
There is a real eternal existence not touched by all this hell.
You deserve a holiday!!! We will miss you but pray you will have a safe and renewing furlough that will allow you time to focus on the beauty and splendor of God’s creation. Have a wonderful time!
Mark was born in Sept 1965, IIRC, and as he appears to be 4 or 5 years old this picture it would have been taken in 1969 or 1970. At this time BHO II, pictured on the left, would have been 8 or 9 and would have been either in Indonesia or HI.
The younger boy, who is David according to Mark, is reported to have been born in 1967 and does appear to be about age 2, as would be appropriate for the age difference between Mark and David.
IMO, the striking resemblance between baby David and baby BHO II provides clear circumstantial support for BHO Sr. to have been their mutual father. For me, the resemblance of BHO II to Baby David provides the clearest refutation that any other man was BHO II's father.
IMO it is also extremely that any woman other than SADO was BHO II's mom given the "big smile" likeness of the adult Barry to her father shown in the picture with Gramps at the beach in HI. I have seen no documentary evidence with or without "PROVENANCE" which supports any other mom for Barry or which refute SADO as Barry's mom.
IMO, SADO is almost certainly Barry's mom because there are lots of documents with claimed provenance supporting SADO as Barry's mom, documenta which can be subjected to legal authentication under the Federal Rules of Evidence should there ever be legal discovery.
I'm not sure what you mean.
I see not only the facial features but the personality of the adult, Mark, in the pictures of the boy he claims to be himself, the so-called “dark boy” (who really isn't that dark when the picture is not overexposed).
“So, I asked what facial features are now different in this second photo, because I certainly don’t see a difference in any features. Not much could of changed in what was likely less than a minute or two.”
What changed was the overexposure in the earlier photo to the more authentic exposure in the new photo making the relatively light adult Mark possible, IMO, compared to the previous “dark boy” image. I did not say the features of Mark changed. To me, the expression of the “dark boy” looks very much like the adult Mark, if you take away the artificially darkened complexion.
It is obvious to me that the so-called “dark boy” photos, both the family shot and one of the ones with the two boys (not the most recently found one) were overexposed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.