Posted on 05/28/2011 8:54:29 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
About Dr. Neal Krawetz...
His basic Bio:
http://www.hackerfactor.com/about.php
His Books, Articles and White Papers:
http://www.hackerfactor.com/publications.php
Ping
Thats not what I heard
I think everyone is clear on my opinion of MissTickly, right? There’s no love lost between us.
Okay. I recently read an article on her blog about the seal on Obama’s short-form COLB as photographed by FactCheck.org. She has a valid point. That seal is debossed not embossed. In other words, it’s completely the opposite of what it should be. WTF? Hawaii uses an embossed seal which creates raised text and images, as evidenced by every other seal we’ve seen and by the law in Hawaii. The seal on his COLB has lowered text and images. She is not mistaken.
Check it out. Let me know if I’m missing something.
FYI to my post #4
Anyone will to predict what the history books will say about the birth place of Obama and his superposed documentation 10 years from now?
Or even one year?
Lies and deceit cannot be maintained forever, they can repetitiously drone over and over hoping to find fertile minds to grow upon.
Nothing lasts forever, the truth will overcome, the lies will be revealed.
Why does your link not work?
Ping. This explains the technical reasons for the white text and much more.
What a laughable claim. There may have been no "intentional manipulation" but the trade-offs that resulted in the released PDF are extreme digital manipulations. Typewriters don't create crisp-edged characters of a single color, nor do ink pens.
While I can't rule out that the person scanning the document meant no harm, it is obvious that the person had no conception of how to scan a legal document whose authenticiy was going to be questioned. The person might just as well have copied the document by hand onto a dinner napkin.
What he doesn’t explain is why the name of hospital was changed ... there’s loads of info on the Internet about how he first listed one hospital and then another as his ‘official’ place of birth.
ALSO, I think maybe Obama WAS born in Hawai’i ... BUT not under the name “Barack Hussein Muhammad Obama. I propose that his birth name is Barry Dunham. His ADOPTIVE name [so he could attend school in Indonesia, a requirement that he be Indonesian is also verifiable] is Barry Soetoro.
EVERYONE is looking for the wrong name on a birth certificate and that’s why it cannot be ‘found.’ It’s not lost or misplaced. It’s listed under Soetoro or Dunham and NOT under Obama.
In one of his books, Obama ADMITS to changing his name to the more ‘exotic’ “Obama” because ‘the girls dug it.’
THEREFORE, unless he can prove that his name was LEGALLY CHANGED to Obama, he’s going under a FALSE/ASSUMED name ... and that’s probably a FELONY.
And in the USofA, we don’t want a FELON in the White House. Of course, in Islam, the more felonious, the better.
Would someone in Hawai’i do a bit of Dunham/Soetoro research, please?
This link should work.
first, i’m NOT a techie. but i absolutely agree with Tex-Con-Man, that the “layers” and Adobe stuff doesn’t prove anything. In fact, i agree with 99% of the above.
But, until the LFBC came out, i believed Obama was born in Hawaii. I am convinced the document is a fraud, for many reasons not addressed above.
Longbow, Steel Wolf, and even Jeff Winston (all of whom, i respect greatly, even if i disagree with them), have at least acknowledged and addressed these many other, much stronger anomolies. maybe they are correct, about the signatures of different resolutions/ pixel sizes, the words that curve next to words that don’t, etc.
but i foolishly still believe they are clear evidence of fraud.
the stuff above about layers, implying that is all that is wrong, is simply misleading at best.
and the 1 thing i disagree with above, is:
“Finally, birthers make their boldest claims when they hide behind anonymity.”
this is simply not true.
i have read court affidavits, by graphics experts, that
are certainly not anonymous. And other experts, that have posted on the internet, that are not anonymous. (one lady especially impressed me, with her experience.)
...the “expert” that was on Fox immediately after the LFBC was released, was a Canadian trade school graduate, with a previous history of Obama advocacy.
but again, i agree the “layers” prove nothing. but there are MANY more things that strongly suggest the LFBC is a fraud. ESPECIALLY in context. “anti-birthers” knock one or 2 items out, and claim victory. ignoring the clear evidence of coverup and fraud, that Satindoll has documented for years.
...missing page 11 of divorce papers, missing early years of SAD’s passport files, the Obama Sr papers that shows that his AGE on the LFBC is incorrect for 1961, and much more, should raise honest questions from ANY honest American, and make us MORE curious.
...so why is he posting this article about “layers”, that no one cares about now on either side, and making the provable false claim, that there are no experts willing to state their name, when many have done so, including in sworn affidavits under penalty of perjury?
I am not very capable or lucid on such technical minutiae but in my mind I thought the market-ticker guy and the curvature of letters was the most credible criticism. It became obvious that the layering arguments were not rock solid. Also the stamp-seal stuff is pretty intriguing.
The name change assertion is incorrect. He went by Barry Obama. In his book, he describes when and why he decided to use Barack. The name change wasn’t from Soetoro to Obama. It was from Barry to Barack.
http://www.newsweek.com/2008/03/22/when-barry-became-barack.html
African is not a valid category of race especially during the 1960s. Race categories in Hawaiian classification manual dtd 2006 did not include African either. Thus it had to have been edited well after 1961.
This was written in the first days after the release.It doesn't seem very comprehensive.
... theres loads of info on the Internet about how he first listed one hospital and then another as his official place of birth.
= = =
excellent point! i was recently re-reading an old fluff campaign interview, with OBAMA AND HIS SISTER, that quoted the other hospital as his birthplace.
WHY did Obama and his sister, give the OTHER hospital name to the reporter?
Why can’t Texas Con Man, agree Obama has been lying and covering up, and help us FIND the truth, instead of shooting down old items that don’t matter?
and i absolutely agree with you, about his legal name is Soetoro, and he never legally changed it back to Obama. I have NO doubt, that Obama was legally adopted. His Indonesian school registration, the missing divoce page, missing SAD passport documents, and much mre, all support that.
that deception alone, results in criminal fraud by Obama.
and would at least hurt his reelection in 2012, if more people knew the facts.
(and, his Connecticut SSN IS fraudulent. and also relates to the above. the pieces SUPPORT each other. But anti-birthers won’t look at the forest, because they are too busy cutting down trees. A CT SSN is impossible, since he never lived there!!!
This simply offers an explanation of how a scan turns into a PDF.
But believers believe.
That’s incorrect. See my home page for details. (You can verify the sample BC on ancestry.com.)
There are, in fact, quite a few birther/freepers who claim that the layers are proof the document has been forged.
This simply offers an explanation of how a scan turns into a PDF.
/// thank you Sir. again, i agree with 99% of what you wrote. and some people believe that “face” is evidence. i don’t. i think the face is simply a graphics artifact, an optical illusion, like the face on the moon.
...and, removing false claims, is important. there only needs to be ONE single clear item, to prove the document is a fraud. which is why i ignore things that are ambiguous like layers, or not clear, like the smiley face.
and we know there are Obama trolls here. (and i am NOT saying you are one!) but some of the people pushing already debunked items, i think are trolls passing misinformation, in an attempt to muddy the waters.
...i thank you, for helping to remove items, that don’t prove anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.