Barack 0bama
Posted on 05/07/2011 2:13:23 PM PDT by Brown Deer
16 was the age of consent in Hawaii...
You’re going to ruin a perfectly good story with facts???
I suppose next you’ll be telling me that the law for an under age husband or wife is different...
harumpf.
This is a rediculous idea.
Someone decided to look up the number before his to get a time line. As it turned out that person was dead so the information was public. So it showed when that number was issued, approx when Zero was 16 and living in HI.
What's the source for that DOB?
So, help me alleviate alittle confusion; the CT SS# obama is using, was it a newly issued # in ‘79 or so, or did it belong to a man born in 1890??
I can’t keep up with this.
Interestingly, the baby's weight at birth is not on the Hawaii long form BC of that era - unlike the BC forms of many other jurisdictions.
...whelped an 8 pounder...
Interestingly, the baby's weight at birth is not on the Hawaii long form BC of that era - unlike the BC forms of many other jurisdictions.
The number 042-68-4425 was issued in 1977.
where did the info come from that the SS# he was using belonged to a guy that was born in 1890 and lived (or died) in HI?
Yes. It was issued to a man who was born in 1890. I don’t recall when he died. But the point is that at the time it was issued Obama was working at a Baskins & Robbins Icecream parlor. The question is how he got it. His Granny worked at the Probate Court so she could have had access to stuff like that. It is hard to follow. I think there is a SS thread here somewhere.
I meant an image that PLACES him with someone ANYWHERE.
Unless we take the recent forgery to show his correct birth date, the first document that claims August 4, 1961, is the date on the divorce decree.
That appears to be the first identification by name and date of birth of the child we see with Stanley Ann Dunham at the Zoo, and with Stanley Armour Dunham at the beach.
Where did he come from?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2716654/posts?page=21#21
I am sure that Zero’s parentage is well known. Merely an adopted unwanted child would never have caused this insane mythology, forged documents, hidden documents and so on. No, it is not possible.
Depends who the parents were of the adopted unwanted child...someone of a particular notoriety perhaps?
Wouldn’t that make the guy with the last name ‘Woods’ SS# irrelevant? If his was genuinely issued in ‘77 (or whatever) this would have no bearing whatsoever, on one issued to a guy in 1940ish that was born in 1890...correct? What am I missing?
According to Orly Taitz’ investigation is is NOT in file...it was never issued by SSN!
Freedom of information request sent to Loretta Fuddy- director of HI Dep. of Health
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=21476
The only reason Woods is relevant is to establish a time line of when the number that Obama is using was issued.
Right, I get that but my point is, if the number originally belonged to a guy born in 1890 and it got issued to him in the 30’s or 40’s, then the issuance date to Mr. Wood is irrelevant. Although I DO think the origin of CT is relevant as the 042 is fromt there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.