Posted on 03/22/2011 1:23:41 PM PDT by STARWISE
You keep referring to Colonel Hollister’s “history” as if there were proof that he has a history of untruthfullness. I don’t think you have cited a single example to support this assertion. Do you have any proof of this insertion or is it, as it appears to be, an unsupported smear?
Are you stupid, ignorant or just a liar? She has posted the information from an accredited verification service that has contracts with hundreds of Colleges. It shows Obama atteding Columbia from 9/1/82 until 5/31/83 and receiving a BA in 1983, major studies BS err Political Science (same thing) Which part of that do you accept and which part do you reject?
....The Nation’s #1 Source for Academic Verification
The National Student Clearinghouse, a non-profit organization, is the nation’s trusted source for student degree and enrollment verification. Through our verification reporting solutions, we help educational institutions improve efficiency, reduce costs and workload, and enhance the quality-of-service they provide to their students and alumni, lending institutions, employers, and other organizations.......
http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/about/default.htm
http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/
The start date. Columbia says he started in 1981. I'll take a statement straight from the horse's mouth over a hearsay from a third party any day.
*****
Speaking of squat: If the best you got is that the reason Obama has an O42 Connecticut Social Security number is that way back in 1977 an anonymous clerk in the Social Security Baltimore, Maryland main processing center may have mistyped Obama's zip code by mistyping a Connecticut 0 instead of a Hawaii 9 because the two digits are next to each other on a typewriter and/or a computer keyboard, then I say that you also have squat. Deep, deep, squat.
I also say this: If a present or former Social Security worker in the Baltimore, Maryland center ever comes forward and says that clerks in the center did not use keyboards or typewriters to insert zip codes to a person's application form and that Social Security had safeguards in place to protect Social Security from Obama-type mistakes, then your 0 for 9 theory is not only implausible, it is dead in the water before it even leaves the dock.
Theories aside, it is a fact that Obama is spending a considerable amount of time, money, and judicial system resources from having to disclose what most if not all presidential candidates have.
You can make all the bs theories and excuses you want. Further, Obama by his unconstitutional actions seems to be drumming up further support for the obvious. He is not an American. Not by heart at least.
There is no evidence that someone typed a zero instead of a 9. Just your theory, a very illogical one at that given there is no evidence suggesting it ever happened anywhere.
It is more logical to assume Obama is hiding something by his actions and numerous ambiguities in his background. .
But then it seems that to you logic can only describe a path of reasoning that supports your own preliminary conclusions. To you all of the crazy oddities are mutually exclusive. To the normal mind they say where there is smoke there is fire.
LOL. So data entry clerks never make mistakes. Go it.
It is more logical to assume Obama is hiding something by his actions and numerous ambiguities in his background.
Okay, so tell me, how is having a social security number that begins with 042 evidence he is hiding something.
That is simply not true.
You have no proof or evidence that SS administrators make mistakes. It is just your theory. My theory is that they could have been the first double 6 sigma shop making this impossible to replace a zero with a nine or nine with a zero. My theory has as much substantiation and facts as yours does.
By numerous ambiguities, I am referring to all the different stories and theories about his background and near complete lack of disclosure compared to any of his contemporaries.
Not just limited to birth records, but school records, financial records, health records, state department records, law license records, publishings (besides 2 autobios without footnotes), scholarly articles, etc.....all of these items Obama has the power to disclose yet he choses not to even though his peers invariably do to a much higher degree.
Obama could for example instead of spending money to hide his record in front of a judge, spend that money instead to find out how or what went wrong at the SS administration so as to unite the people around his legitimacy. Instead he uses it to mock his opponents and make jokes at state dinners and further divide us as a country.
Whatever your theory or facts, majority opinion showed in November and will again in 2012 that Obama is not a leader. You can fool people once will be the theme. The issue is already shifting from “why are you a crazy birther” to “what is this guy hiding”. Your denial of this truth will not change that fact and will only be exacerbated by Obama’s continued failure to keep any of his campaign promises raising everyone’s doubts about who he is or what he really stands for. The lack of conviction is unprecedented and historical.
LOL. Are you serious? Do you really believe SS administrators are infallible?
I didn’t say what I thought. I made a point that my theory in fact has as much basis as yours does. As others have pointed out you confuse your assumptions for logic. One has nothing to do with the other.
I'm not buying the transposed numeral idea due to the fact that checking for mistakes is second nature to anyone that used OCR on a daily basis, and, unless a complete noob, would most likely know which state which zip code belonged in.
Of course, if they didn't use OCR at SSA, then the above is moot.
Never underestimate the stupidity of government bureaucrats, especially those engaged in repetetive, mind-numbing tasks such as data entry.
WOW!! You seriously have wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy too much time on your hands dude, really, you might want to get a life if you can get your nose out of obongo’s arse for 5 minutes.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:curiosity/index?more=75527708
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.