Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Sign Unions Losing Influence
Publius Forum ^ | 11/29/10 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 11/29/2010 12:51:19 PM PST by Mobile Vulgus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: BenKenobi

“Every vendor, every pensioner, every citizen will go down hard to preserve public sector unions.”

And Obama will make sure the unions get preferential treatment, too. He couldn’t care less who else is hurt.


21 posted on 11/29/2010 4:21:24 PM PST by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi
The problem is that as unions become extinct in the private sector, public sector unions will fight back tooth and nail to make sure that if bankruptcy does occur, that they are privileged over all other creditors. As happened with the GM bankruptcy.

I think that's less likely to happen in a state bankruptcy. In GM'S case, the Federal government had a lot of leverage because it was providing debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing. In the case of Chrysler, most of the creditors were TARP recipients, and essentially were thus forced to go along with whatever the Feds wanted.

I don't see what would give the Feds a comparable amount of leverage in the case of a state bankruptcy. There's no need for DIP financing, and banks typically don't make up a large portion of a state's creditors. On the contrary, a state's creditors largely consist of pension funds, university endowments, and bond funds held by retirees, all of which are politically powerful constituencies.

22 posted on 11/30/2010 9:43:57 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
And Obama will make sure the unions get preferential treatment, too.

I think it will be harder to do in this case. See post 22.

23 posted on 11/30/2010 9:44:54 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

There’s never been a past example. What will happen is that the cuts will target every ‘non-union’ worker under contract with the state.

Then they will cut essential services, Police/Fire departments, getting rid of new cops, or ‘early retirement’ to those who already are close to topping off their pensions.

The idea is to make the austerity cuts hit the public as hard as possible so that the public SCREAMS against the cuts and then the communists push against the cuts in the next election, saying that they’ll restore it, and they will win.

It’a an age old game. I’ve ran before, on a platform of balancing the budget only to run into fire from my own party that argued such wasn’t at all possible. Libs run on my ideas, cut the deficit and in two years the budget will be balanced again.

Sooo frustrating. So much coulda woulda shoulda, but I won’t run for backstabbers again.


24 posted on 11/30/2010 5:31:15 PM PST by BenKenobi (DonÂ’t worry about being effective. Just concentrate on being faithful to the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson