Posted on 09/05/2010 10:56:10 AM PDT by Kaslin
In other words, you can't dispute the points I made proving that Christianity does not equal conservatism, so you resort to insults, like a child. No problem. I didn't have high expectations for you anyway, seeing your behavior on this thread. Actually I haven't seen anyone on this thread that makes Christianity look noble or wise or intriguing. Just a bunch of insulting, dishonest, defensive tattles who won't win anyone over.
It's by two homosexuals, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, and it's called "After the Ball".
The sophisticated strategy Kirk and Madsen lay out for changing the way Americans think about homosexuality boasts three phases: "Desensitization," "Jamming" and "Conversion."
"Desensitization," these two gay marketing gurus tell us, consists of inundating the public in a "continuous flood of gay-related advertising, presented in the least offensive fashion possible. If straights can't shut off the shower, they may at least eventually get used to being wet."...
"Jamming," explains marketing expert Paul E. Rondeau of Regent University, in his comprehensive study "Selling Homosexuality to America," "is psychological terrorism meant to silence expression of or even support for dissenting opinion."
"After the Ball" tries to inspire potential jammers by providing a juicy list of negative associations with which opponents, usually Christians, are to be smeared. They include: "Klansmen demanding that gays be slaughtered or castrated," "hysterical backwoods preachers, drooling with hate," "menacing punks, thugs and convicts who speak coolly about the 'fags' they have bashed," and a "tour of Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed."....
No one wants to win you over. You are an egotistical bigot and we just want you to STHU.
************************
That didn't take long.
Interesting. We probably could have written that ourselves, just from some of the posts we’ve seen on this thread.
The only one harping on Christianity is her.
Here's your post 330: You don't come right out and cheer on homosexual rights. Instead you spend your time attacking those against the agenda. THAT is very telling.
You don't even have the decency or courage to admit what you're doing.
My Genes Made Me Do It! - A Scientific Look at Sexual Orientation.PDF
We shall frequently call homosexuality “SSA” (Same-sex Attraction) and heterosexuality “OSA” (Opposite Sex Attraction). (Not On-line Sexual Activity!) SSA is more appropriate because homosexuality is not sexual in origin, though can become so in practice. Same-sex Attraction more accurately expresses this strong connection to people of the same gender.
In this first chapter we will argue that SSA is too common to be dependent on a single gene or its mutation, or even many genes. Similarly it is too common to be a biological developmental error, but could plausibly be a psychological trait. For all of us— homosexual or not—genetic structure and function only hint at the people we ultimately can become. They have very little to do with our sexuality.
Congratulations. That's the first honest thing you've said to me.
I suppose we have to keep in mind that two of the angriest, most aggressive and abusive posters on here each have a family member who is gay. It’s obviously upsetting to them.
And there are facts. You just ignore them.
Have a nice day.
They want you to shut up because they didn’t come here to debate folks pushing the homosexual agenda, or any other liberal agenda. This is a website devoted to independent conservative activism, not debate with leftists who have their heart set on destroying the moral basis for our free republic.
Given the hostility of many of your posts, what would you say is your motivation, Dr. Freud?
And when I say change their MINDS, I mean: convince them of the following truths.... drilling ANWR will benefit them more than gay marriage. Controlling immigration, fighting terrorism, and lowering taxes will benefit them more than hate crime legislation.
This is the only difference between you and me on the 'gay' question.
You're attacking me because you're mad that I don't think Christians are always good conservatives. But you need to be able separate these two issues or you will be too emotional to hold up a rational debate.
Amazing. I’d be willing to bet that very few in our society have any idea that this exists.
“Researcher finds gay gene” was the way the media headlined the news of American geneticist Dean Hamer’s claim to have found a link between genetics and homosexuality in 1993 (Chapter Nine). But that’s not what Dean Hamer was claiming, at least publicly. Hamer said: “We have not found the gene—which we don’t think exists—for sexual orientation.”2 Hamer knew that any attempt to argue the existence of a “homosexual gene”—a single, apparently autocratic, gene governing homosexuality—is nonsense, genetically. There is no single gene governing sexual preference or any other preference. There is no gene for smoking, dancing, or making sarcastic remarks.
There’s a lot of good scientific info. But the homosexuals and MSM hide it or drown it out.
Ignore her and do some research instead. She only posts feelings and opinions and cares nothing for facts.
I am not “disputing” or debating anything with you, any more than I would try to make friends with a growling, drooling dog.
You’ve proved one thing only: that you cannot discuess or debate in a rational manner; you make false assumptions, use straw man tactics, refuse to acknnowledge what you yourself have said, or what others have said, and so on.
Once bitten, twice shy, is my method for dealing with mad dogs, or people act like them on the internet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.