Posted on 07/31/2010 6:25:47 PM PDT by jdirt
My expectation and what I will do is that the truth will be pursued as long as it takes.
The Theseus natural born citizen link. Regret the delay.
Rachael
I’m of the firm belief that exposing Obama’s narrative is a necessary battle in a much larger war.
Obama’s background and relationships expose those who assisted, financed and ultimately prevailed in a virtual coup of our nation.
If we do not figure who the players are and how they are intertwined, we can not win any war against them. In fact, we can’t even formulate a battle plan. The enemy must be identified first.
Just as in Iraq when our intelligence community began with their “Ace of Spade” - Saddam Hussein and worked outwards, drawing parallels between each individual player from Saddam’s wives to the lowest sheep herder. After identifying the players MI set about understanding each relationship and how each person in their own way and collectively assisted Saddam.
It was in identifying these people, regardless of how many degrees of separation, that ultimately led our military to dig Saddam out of his hole.
Obama is our Ace of Spades.
The same tribal mentality found in Iraq exists in this country. Obama didn’t make himself, he was molded, groomed, supported and financed and handed his power. It is these yet unidentified behind the scenes players we must focus on.
Progressives are the smallest group of politically active members of US society and yet, look at the power, wealth and influence they hold. How does such small faction of unelected people manage such influence over America? We may survive Obama, we will not survive his puppet-masters.
This war will not be won focusing on one battlefield. It is going to take throwing everything we have to take down the enemy and their support structure.
We also need Michelle Bachman’s, Allen West’s and other ethical constitutionalist for us to win and hold our ground. Investigating Obama isn’t an all or nothing proposition. We have the intelligence, willpower and determination to do both and more if needed.
If that date is correct, how does that fit the timeline of her divorce from husband #1, Obama? The divorce decree was dated March 20, 1964!
Was Stanley Ann Dunham-Obama-Soetoro's 2nd marriage not valid (due to bigamy)?
-------
Logical explanation is that she screwed up and put in the date of her divorce (could have been the actual hearing date with the filing a few weeks later) instead of the date of her marriage on the passport application.
A copy of the divorce decree was released with the Soetoro papers today. The date of the hearing is indeed March 5th, 1964. Also this date is more prominent on the decree than than the approval date.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.