Posted on 01/23/2010 10:19:54 AM PST by rabscuttle385
A Conservative backing McInsane and his amnesty horsesh!t?
Please!
Come on, Sarah. You should know better than this.
President Ronald Reagan was the greatest, no comparison, in my lifetime. It was a different time, post-Nixon,Ford,Carter, I doubt you can fasten anti-Americanism, pro-Islam, PC to the max, anti-JudeoChristian, TARPing semtiments in our government today onto RR.
RR was the ONLY President who was NOT a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, whose interests are working toward the New World Order.
Get some fresh air. The sillyweed is getting to you.
Once again you offer anecdotal evidence and no numbers. Show me the data from last years election that proves enough conservatives stayed home to have any impact on the 9.5 million vote victory of Barack Hussein Obama. Come on. There are tens of thousands of pages of data and analysis of last year’s election. Find one single rational article (using facts, not anecdotes) that supports this straw man argument that conservatives who did not vote for McCain cost him the election.
Anyone?
Bueller?
Bueller?
Anyone?
McCain was a weak candidate who refused to fight and therefore had no chance of beating the overwhelming ignorance of the American voter.
My good friend VRWC, I wish we could flush the above raw particulate matter down the drain tomorrow - especially McCain - but we've got a tiny problem to overcome in the Senate. It's called a a "Vet-Proof" 60-40 Majority.
Until we get a better handle on that I'm afraid we're stuck dancing with the Party Goblins for now until we can afford the purtier ones.
They don't have our best interests in mind--in fact they diss conservatives not only amongst themselves but publicly.
Sarah Palin had best disentangle herself from this Establishment bunch and cast her lot with true conservatives! We will welcome her!
But she hasw been making patriots pretty nervous lately. And disenchanted.
"Remain" cohesive??? The GOP is suffering from the same disease as the Party of the Asses.
Long-time traditional Democrats are freaking out that the hard-core Left Progressive wing of their party is now thoroughly dominant, under the consolidating leadership of TOTUS, perhaps the most famous disciple of Saul Alinsky alive today.
An anecdote from the special election in Massachusetts last Tuesday: At one of Scott Brown's (R) events, about 50 union workers showed up brandishing Coakley (D) signs. They were approached by a Boston talk-radio personality, who asked them why they supported Coakley. They said: "Oh hell, we're not voting for Coakley. We're voting for Scott Brown. But we got paid $50 each to carry these signs."
On further inquiry, basically their beef was the increasing arrogance, unresponsiveness, intransparency, and sheer filthy greed of government, federal and state. [Also they didn't trust 0bama's promise about how they would be exempt from the tax on Cadillac health plans, so they wanted 0bamaKare killed. :^)]
Anyhoot, these union guys would be examples of the "old-time" Massachusetts Democrat which the Progressive Left of the Party is assiduously trying to kill off. [Ask Nancy Pelosi whether she cares about keeping any of the "Blue-Dog Democrats" around her House. In all likelihood, she regards them as pests.]
The GOP's corresponding problem is they seemingly don't believe in their own values and principles anymore the enduring heritage We the People received from our Founding Fathers. One senses many of the national Party leaders are embarrassed by the Party's own Platform, and find it increasingly inconvenient It isn't an instant, knee-jerk vote getter. People have to reason it over and understand it first.
But the party doesn't seem to want to elaborate and defend the core principles that have been at the heart of historical American society, on which its own Platform Planks serenely rest. The attitude seems to be: If the party has to sacrifice some/any of these values and principles in order to attract new voters, then what's the problem?
Looks like a moral problem to me. I left the GOP last October in consequence, in disgust.
Meanwhile, increasingly it is the unaffiliated/independent vote that swings elections. Surveys show they resonate more with the Tea Party Movement than they do with any organized party.
Here's another significant factor: SCOTUS' ruling this past week, reversing a huge part of the McCain-Feingold campaign financing reform on grounds that it hampers First Amendment speech; in effect that for-profit and not-for-profit entities are entitled under the First Amendment to free (unfettered) political speech.
Sounds good to me! I think this ruling actually makes matters political more transparent to the public: Lobbyists (whether the NRA or business corporations) can lobby the government out in the open (via advertising in any medium) right up to election day, rather than in smoke-filled back rooms, in the dead of night, where "nobody" sees it....
Which I suspect is the reason why the Usurper-in-Chief has gone apoplectic over this ruling: He is a man who prefers to work in the dark...
Both these phenomena, to me, indicate there's a huge political realignment going on in our country. It's happening within both major parties, but I think that simply mirrors something more profound going on in the general electorate as a whole. There seems to be a sort of spiritual turning toward a more traditionally American conservative philosophical and moral posture.
At least that's how I'm reading the tea leaves! LOLOL! We'll see.... Oh my, we live in such "interesting times!" :^)
Thank you so very much for sharing your thoughts, Norman!
Stop sniffing glue. The GOP is expected to pick up Senate seats in November. McDemocrat must be defeated to win the war on Liberalism. Now is not the time to play defense.
Why we're losing what?
Oh... it's nothing much... just the Senate, House, Presidency... :-)
RR was the ONLY President who was NOT a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, whose interests are working toward the New World Order.
No problem there... these same FReepers would throw the RINO label on him too.... LOL... for appealing to too many other voters, and thereby he's "gotta be a RINO"... doncha know... :-)
Get some fresh air. The sillyweed is getting to you.
Oh..., sorry, you've confused me with some of those "Ron-Paulites" and their "legal drugs for everyone in the country" ideas... LOL...
That's their "bag" not mine... :-)
That’s not what my fellow FReepers are saying in their posts... LOL...
I think that Glenn Beck was rught: that if Juan McCain was elected rather than Obama, the Tea Party movement might not have even started, ‘cuz most conservatives woulda just sat there & accepted McCain’s continuation of the Bush / Obama policies.
If there is anything positive about Obama being elected, it has to be the rising up of the Tea Partiers, IMO.
A Pro-life, pro-America, Pro-military, Pro-drill-here-drill- now, Pro-2nd Amendment, Pro tax-cutting RINO?
If that’s a RINO we could use a lot more like her.
Just because Sarah backs McCain doesn’t mean she supports amnesty. In fact, she has stated the contrary. Are you saying a candidate has to agree with you 100% in order to receive your support?
Would we have UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE with Juan McLoser as President? Your answer will determine how honest you are.
Then theyll come whining about how the RINO GOP screwed them. Fools.
Yep.... those who are ragging on Sarah Palin are playing the fools game all right...
Juan McAmnesty is 100% Democrat. His record at backstabbing Conservatives is well document on FR.
Show me the data from last years election that proves enough conservatives stayed home to have any impact on the 9.5 million vote victory of Barack Hussein Obama.
They didn't have to stay at home, all they had to do was not vote for McCain/Palin... and that's all she wrote...
You said it clearly! For those who want to see... ;.}
You do realize McCain is fighting against Obamacare, right?
Besides, how can you call me a “sit at home” conservative when I actually VOTED TWICE (in the primary & general election)...not to mention my going to Tea Party events?
Your ignorance reeks...I suggest you go take a shower.
Would we have UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE with Juan McLoser as President? Your answer will determine how honest you are.
Nope, we would never have Obamacare... thank you very much... LOL...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.