Posted on 01/06/2010 6:30:17 AM PST by SvenMagnussen
You should not have Post Reply to my # 440!!
Had you seen post #439 you would have realized that I was addressing Jackv NOT you. When posting on many different threads, I made a mistake with you and I apologize for not being more alert. Thank you for waking me up!!!
You, as many others, seem so blinded by your hatred of Obama that you cannot deal with reality. Neither can you effectively converse with those who do.
Blind hatred of Obama? I don't like Obama for which he represents - hate is a harsh word. To truly hate someone must take a lot of effort.
I do not defend Obama. I defend rationality, which real conservatives prize.
Laughable. You do defend Obama all the time...your rationality is left lacking.
Leaches are very difficult to get rid of!!!
She have longer legs than the “Long Legged McDaddy”!!!
Or perhaps Orly is just incompetent.
Labeling and ridiculing the opposition is a tactic of the communist union organizer Saul Alinsky which he detailed in his book, “Rules for Radicals”. Specifically that tactic is Rule #5. Obama is the grandmaster of Alinsky smear tactics and ridicule. He learned it well when he worked as a “community organizer” studying Alinsky the father of “community organizing”. A community organizer is simply a euphemism for a leader and trainer of radical agitators and street type demonstrations.
These same people use the Alinsky’s power tactics in the streets and cyberspace to further their long-term goal following the “Cloward-Piven Strategy” to destroy America’s economic system and social fabric and our Constitutional Republic form of government and replace it with totalitarian socialism or fascism.
Lenin and Stalin had the “Bourgeois,” Hitler had the “Untermenschen,” Pol Pot had the “Intelligentsia,” and now Obama has the “Birthers.” People like this have always needed someone to blame for their own inadequacies, a scapegoat for their failures.
They expect us to revere their writings and status as mainstream reporting, they want us to fold like little children being scolded by the teacher. They are blind to their own impotence, so we accept their challenge and feel that it is best and fair that we give them a name too. They lost the right to be called reporters, for they no longer report, they have become distorters of truth.
Thank you!
Well, the idea is that OUR position is LOGICALLY the more solid and justifiable one -- the majority view: if one takes the easily understandable and straightforward words of Chief Justice Waite at face.
Therefore, the onus should be on the anti-berthers -- and by extension, Obama -- to prove THEIR case.
Our case is on the solid ground of certainty, whereas, their case is on the shaky ground of doubt.
They should be playing defence -- NOT us!
STE=Q
That is how he gets his daily orgasm with one hand on the keyboard and the other.............!!!
Somebody said that you also are a “customer” at DU, is that correct???
Where did you post that and when, please???
You’re not winning any impartial converts here. Obama acts like a crook using the court system to hide behind. Measured and parsed statements from the Hawaiian DoH is insufficient. All Obama has to do is show his birth certificate to an impartial and controlling authority to be done with it. And showing a dubious COLB .jpg online that can be fabricated is not convincing his critics. Not much things are easier to do than what I stated above unless he has something damning to hide.
He has never posted anything of Conservative constructive issues, hiding behind the mantle of being a "Conservative (?)"!!
He is a 24/7 "AFTER-BIRTHER" and a ZERO-BRIGADE mole to do his best to distort the real issue. He has not addressed anything what this long thread is all about, Congressman Deal's letter asking to see the B.C!!!
Insanity of "AFTER-BIRTHERS" seems lately to have hijacked the threads. Lord have mercy!!!
And what motive do YOU have???
I guess you'd be OK with Congress passing a law making writing on an internet forum neither speach nor press, and thus subject to anything Congress wishes to do with it.
Laws cannot define any Constitutional term, for that would allow them to change the Constitution.
If you mean "case law", there is no case law directly on the subject, for the only time the distinction matters is for eligibility to the office of President.
When we have the time they don't. :-)
I see the good FReeper El Gato is here to finish today’s cleanup routine. ;-)
That was a copy/paste from another source, sorry!
As usual you are distorting!
Your usurper has never posted a B.C. or for that matter a COLB!!
A faked computer generated "paper" was posted by a THIRD party, not valid in court!!!
Your post-counter must be over 300 by now on this subject only, right???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.