Irish new energy device offers solution for UN climate talks

The Examiner ^ | December 15, 2009 | Michael Salla, Ph.D.

[gaylord_fister]

I was under the impression that the Irish have been researching alcohol-based energy generation for centuries.

[irishtenor]

***Irish science? I’m sure it makes sense after a number of pints!***

See my tag line :>)

[outofstyle]

I understand all that. However, it seems to me Orbo’s approach is flawed. The very process of controlling the MH position of materials during permanent magnetic interactions negates the very existence of the Counter Electromotive Force that must, as you pointed out, be decoupled from torque in order for electromagnetic interactions to occur.

[count-your-change]

Yes. It's a very sound and practical system. To explain it in layman's terms: The hyper cyclic energy drive magnets are differentially translocated during the Epsom Phase of magnetic flux saturation. Then as torque develops the uplift phase generation occurs and the inversion of resistance to persistence at a distance.....you're not understanding this are you? Another glass of the house's finest and I'll start over again. Leave the bottle on the table.

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[BitWielder1]

...the inversion of resistance to persistence at a distance...

That's nice! Are you a poet?

[count-your-change]

No, but I’d probably come closer to earning a living as a poet than a writer about Irish Perpetual Motion Machines.

[omni-scientist]

I think this does follow a certain form of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. That is, the less forthcoming the purveyors are of an understandable, repeatable concept of their machine based on known science, the more sure we can be that it is a hoax.

On the other hand, if they have found a new source of free energy in the universe, they can be wealthier than Bill Gates, AND win at least two Nobel prizes.

[Walmartian]

The heat of the meat is in-directionally proportional to the angle of the dangle.

[count-your-change]

One thing the company will be able to produce in abundance is press releases. Breathless announcements of being on the cusp of a scientific breakthrough that was right before our eyes all the while but no one saw it for the simplicity of it.....Yes...quite....more deathless optimism and promises of being able to reach an ever receding horizon of success if the investors will just do their part.

[Robert A Cook PE]

I’m actually not too worried about the theory or the technobabble (hiding) behind the theory. Or do we say that the technobabble is hiding the theory? 8<)

Regardless, IF I see it work, and, as stated - WHN somebody else builds an equal or comparable machine that produces energy from nothing - else how can you exceed 100% efficiency? - to get more energy out of the machine than is going in .... I will not believe it.

The theory? Only a 120 years ago, the president of the Royal Society claimed that everything in physics had been discovered and that nothing was left to do.

Then a certain photographic plate turned black. With no lights in the room.

So there will be lots of time left to talk about the theory.

[neverdem]

How The Irish Saved Civilization

It has a lot more credibility.

[Robert A Cook PE]

I’ve bought a couple of his other books: This one is on the list for the ever-expanding “science shelf” when I get back in the states.

[Ole Okie]

Then as torque develops the uplift phase generation occurs and the inversion of resistance to persistence at a distance.....you're not understanding this are you?

Drat! You left out the disgronifier function.

But unless the US Patent Office has recently changed its policy, they can't get a US patent on a perpetual motion machine. With a 3:1 output/input ratio, yet!

[BitWielder1]

I'm not saying that Perpetual Motion Machines completely impossible beyond any shadow of a doubt, nor that we know everything already, only that to the best of our current knowledge and based on past history of attempted PMMs, chances are pretty darn good that they won't work.
Somewhere around 99.999999...%.
Therefore, the burden of proof is on the inventor, or anyone else who makes claims of the extraordinary.
Others, don't waste your time on it unless you enjoy high frustration levels and only invest money if you can afford to lose it (or if you think you can fool others into investing :-).

That said, I would LOVE to see at least one extraordinary claim come true some day, be it PMM, FTL, Telekinesis, Bigfoot, Yeti, Loch Ness monster, living Neanderthals, Aliens or anything like that.
But I won't believe it until I see it.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Oh heck - that durn transgrominfrier. Again. (Probably fergot to change the loosebrication oil after the 4th mogrifirier overheated, didn’t you?)

I’m not worried about them inventing a perpetual motion machine .... At 3:1 energy output conversion ratio, this thing’s a perpetual acceleration machine.