Skip to comments.
ACORN to sue O’Keefe, Giles, Breitbart; fired workers to file criminal complaint in MD today?
Inside Charm City ^
| 9/18/2009
Posted on 09/18/2009 7:21:41 AM PDT by jeffq73
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 241-246 next last
To: jeffq73
If your team is losing 56-3 with only 7 seconds on the clock and you realize you were cheated out of 3 seconds earlier in the 4th, do you spend 20 minutes arguing your case to get those 3 seconds back, or do you do your best to keep together team morale, finish out the 7 remaining, and get the heck off the field.
Goooooo
Breitbart, Beeeeeeaaat ACORN!
181
posted on
09/18/2009 8:47:42 AM PDT
by
mlizzy
(Perpetual Eucharistic Adoration Chapels Everywhere spells P.E.A.C.E.)
To: GonzoGOP
I thought the one-party vs. two-party consent only applied to electronic communication like the telephone.
To: MizSterious
Judges are easily bought and sold.
183
posted on
09/18/2009 8:49:01 AM PDT
by
x_plus_one
(In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell)
To: jeffq73
But wait. The former employees of the beleaguered community activist group ACORN claims are barred based on their fraudulent misconduct and breaches of their fiduciary duties as employees of ACORN.
184
posted on
09/18/2009 8:49:16 AM PDT
by
RedhairRedhair
(I love my (scab made) Toyota)
To: kcvl
To: alephnull
I know that it can be applied to recording a meeting. Since there was Audio on the tape those laws would apply. I'm not sure what the laws are in MD today, but I remember back in the 90’s when there was some issue about Dems doing gotcha recording Republicans that it came up that it was legal in MD and not legal in DC.
186
posted on
09/18/2009 8:57:26 AM PDT
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world, and they are all out to get me.)
To: jeffq73
This will be a defense fund for which I will most certainly enjoy donating money!!
187
posted on
09/18/2009 8:58:34 AM PDT
by
ConservativeMind
(Liberals have an inability to value good character or to desire it for themselves.)
To: Neidermeyer
There were two parties involved, the girl and the guy. They gave consent.
188
posted on
09/18/2009 8:59:20 AM PDT
by
ConservativeMind
(Liberals have an inability to value good character or to desire it for themselves.)
To: Caribou
One office doing this is isolated but FIVE offices spread out over the U.S. is a RICO case. ACORN had to have a training guide for ALL their employees since ALL the employees that got caught were giving the SAME advice. When Andrew Breitbart was on Hannity the other night, he strongly implied there are many more tapes "in the can". The lady involved said there was not one office they visited where they were turned away. I would count on a mass dumping of dozens of tapes if ACORN tries to go after the filmmakers. In any case, the courts have consistently shown a reluctance to impose "prior restraint" on journalists - if ACORN gets an injunction banning the showing of these five, I bet 5 more get released.
189
posted on
09/18/2009 9:02:45 AM PDT
by
In Maryland
("Impromptu Obamanomics is getting scarier by the day ..." - Caroline Baum)
To: dools007
Acorn’s lawyers are probably getting the “correct” judges lined up...
190
posted on
09/18/2009 9:05:39 AM PDT
by
MRadtke
(NOT the baseball player)
To: Scythian
"I hear all the time cases on the news of some guy filming ladies in the store changing rooms, they never get charged cause theyre breaking no law, which maddens me, yet these reporters broke the law?" I'm not sure what state you're living in, but in most states in which I'm familiar, that too would be violation of law.
In most states (probably all states), you can't videotape - and maybe can't audio record - somewhere where they have a clear expectation of privacy. A "changing room" or bathroom presents a clear expectation of privacy.P> In this case, it's a little more complicated. Because of the advent and subsequent ubiquity of security cameras, you may be videotaped virtually anywhere that doesn't have a reasonable expectation of privacy, which is effectively anyplace that isn't bathroom or changing room or someplace similar. So, these journalists aren't in jeopardy for the videotaping, per se.
The audio portion of that tape, however, presents a different set of problems. From reading the MD law (§ 10-402), and the court rulings associated with that law, it's clear that these kids have some potential problems on their hands if, after reviewing the complaint, the prosecutor decides to move forward with the case. I'm HIGHLY doubtful that a prosecutor would abuse his discretion in a case involving these circumstances. I just don't think this is moving forward to prosecution, irrespective of ACORN's or their employee's protestations.
191
posted on
09/18/2009 9:10:59 AM PDT
by
OldDeckHand
(No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
To: MRadtke
When Media Darling John Stewart is calling the State Run Media on their non-coverage of this story, I am sorry stick a fork in them, the State Run Media is incompetent.
192
posted on
09/18/2009 9:12:18 AM PDT
by
GraceG
To: darkwing104
Lol! Thx for the laugh this morn!
193
posted on
09/18/2009 9:14:11 AM PDT
by
top 2 toe red
(Not supporting a corrupt, Marxist, Socialist President makes me a racist?!? Then a racist I am!!!)
To: jeffq73
I’d bet these displaced ACORN workers will gravitate to some of the other community organizations of lesser notoriety than ACORN that exist in localities rather than Nationally.
I’d bet it wouldn’t take too much to expose their association with ACORN either.
I’d bet it’s possible to create a negative aura about everyone of them that would destroy any of their type of organizations credibility by 2010.
194
posted on
09/18/2009 9:14:15 AM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
To: angkor
Linda Tripp may have saved Monica Lewinski from being Arkancided by taping her.
To: top 2 toe red
Thank you
196
posted on
09/18/2009 9:22:08 AM PDT
by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: jeffq73
Excellent. they walked rightinto a trap. Can’t wait to depose them. In most jurisdictions, you are allowed to ask anything that “could reasonably lead to admissable evidence”.
197
posted on
09/18/2009 9:23:45 AM PDT
by
MattinNJ
(Palin-I cannot spare this woman. She fights.)
To: romanesq
ACORN can be third partied in. At the very least they will be fact witnesses that can be deposed and have records that can be subpoenad.
198
posted on
09/18/2009 9:25:14 AM PDT
by
MattinNJ
(Palin-I cannot spare this woman. She fights.)
To: jeffq73
Do the new federal whistle-blower and the “protect the reporter” statutes have any influence on how this will go forward?
199
posted on
09/18/2009 9:27:41 AM PDT
by
Real Cynic No More
(The only thing standing between us and complete victory over the evildoers is POLITICS!)
To: jeffq73
Oh goody! I can’t wait for discovery. It will keep the story in the news and alive for months. In the mean time, the evidence builds tying in odumbas* and his pals Jarrett, Axelgreaseball and others with their dirty deeds in ACORN, SEIU and their offspring.
200
posted on
09/18/2009 9:28:44 AM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 241-246 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson