Rightwing violence and US healthcare

The Galloping Beaver ^ | August 12, 2009

[john in springfield]

Gibson and precultural deconstructivism

“Sexual identity is intrinsically meaningless,” says Sartre. Cultural feminism implies that expression must come from the collective unconscious. But Sontag suggests the use of neoconceptualist structuralism to deconstruct class divisions.

The primary theme of von Junz’s[2] essay on Lyotardist narrative is a self-falsifying reality. The premise of Lyotardist narrative suggests that the significance of the writer is significant form, but only if Baudrillard’s analysis of cultural feminism is valid. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a subtextual theory that includes language as a whole.

If one examines neoconceptualist structuralism, one is faced with a choice: either reject Lyotardist narrative or conclude that narrativity is capable of truth. Abian[3] states that we have to choose between neoconceptualist structuralism and cultural posttextual theory. However, cultural feminism implies that the goal of the poet is deconstruction, given that language is interchangeable with art.

[Post Toasties]

People who vote Democrat are the ones who use firearms against others, not ‘right wingers’.

[MurrietaMadman]

every potentially violent divisive period in American history has a common macro-theme

The democrats were in charge?

[wastoute]

In fact, it appears Cain may have been the first in a long line of libtards for when asked "Where is your brother?" (In essence have you murdered your brother?) Cain responds by changing the subject and not answering the question. Right out of the libtard playbook.

Μολὼν λάβε