Posted on 11/05/2008 9:29:20 PM PST by DJ Republica
Jindal/Cantor seems most likely, and also most viable. Palin does not want to be second banana again, nor should she.
Can we vote early - by four years?
Jindal/Hunter!
Jindal/Cantor?
Or, when the media works hard to present the candidate as a stupid radical right-wing bible nut - you loose the election.
You have to admit, they really raked her over the coals.
FYI McCain camp is blaming Palin now for the loss!
Yall go ahead and keep blaming sara if it makes ya feel better... mac didn’t stand a chance without her...
LOL
What’s wrong with that? I think that’s the best ticket we can throw out there for 2012...unless Petraeus wants to be on the undercard for Jindal.
Palin is the reason why Obama didn't get 70% of the vote. Why is that so hard for people to understand??
Palin energized many of us who actually thought we could have someone in office that use common sense and maybe do things to have a smaller, less intrusive government.
But the power structure will fight her with everything they have. That includes Dems and Reps.
Sorry. My eyes just grazed your post and I didn’t see that you already put put Jindal/Cantor in. I was offering the pair as my fav option.
Of course they are. It’s what cowards do.
Sarah wants to take down the other Murkowski? Another reason for me to love her.
I am tired of the people claiming that we need more “centrist” candidates. According to this logic, “moderate” voters will vote for a far-left candidate, but not a conservative one. Yeah, right.
In reality running a “centrist” candidate just shifts things from a real debate to a debate over what degree of liberalism/socialism will dominate Washington. People are now claiming that a self-described maverick candidate lost not because of who he is, but because his VP was seen as too conservative. In my opinion this defies logic and reality.
There are huge swaths of everyday Americans who don’t think like the people in Washington. The Republican party has regularly treated them as the Democrats treat blacks — as the means to their power and not a real constituency. Guess what, if the Republicans provided a clear contrast (in ACTIONS, not just declaring that “there are obvious differences between me and my opponent”) then they would win a lot more. Scapegoat that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.