Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Birth Certificate a "serious embarrassment" Source?
All the News that Fits ^ | 10/22/08 | Nancy

Posted on 10/22/2008 2:11:53 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-230 next last
To: savvyguy

“I been begging mcCain people to hold a press conference or cal attention to me. What are they afraid of? They need to hear from more of you, demanding to make a BIG noise NOW!!”

They are afraid of the media making a moral equivalence statement about the fact he was born, not in the canal zone, but in Colon, Panama. The law involved doesn’t matter, because the media would turn and attack HIS qualification under the same argument that they would frame.

McCain cannot touch this.


201 posted on 10/23/2008 3:15:10 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Wonder what’s so embarrassing?

He was born in Kenys?

He was born out of wedlock making him a b*stard?

His real father was Communist child molester Frank Marshall Davis?

Inquiring minds want to know.


202 posted on 10/23/2008 3:30:32 PM PDT by Emperor Palpatine ("Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
he true birth certificate will show that Barack Obama Sr. was not Zerobama's father and the real father was someone whom O. wants to keep concealed at all costs.

Good grief. Maybe it's McCain! The Wall Street Journal had an article the other day about a family of blacks who claim shared DNA with with our friend John. Their family lived on his family's plantation and they always considered themselves related.

203 posted on 10/23/2008 5:22:58 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

maybe he was born a girl?


204 posted on 10/23/2008 5:53:22 PM PDT by maria60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
particularly serious embarrassment will result

This means the minimum involved is a lie. Maximum, he's not a citizen.

The lie is OK, though, since he's the messiah.

205 posted on 10/23/2008 6:04:07 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Police: We’ve got a search warrant. We suspect there is a dead body in your car trunk. Open up the trunk.

Obama: Officer, particularly serious embarrassment will result from opening said trunk.

Police: Oh, well, forget it then. Sorry to bother you. Have a nice day.


206 posted on 10/23/2008 6:13:14 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

He doesn’t look that much like either. But there is a third party involved whose genes are involved.


207 posted on 10/23/2008 6:18:05 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

Why would you disrespect Berg? He is asking the Court for a reasonable response. He cannot PROVE anything on his own.


208 posted on 10/23/2008 6:21:32 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pissant
You know, it may not be fair, but when you run for President of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA you pretty much leave your privacy at the starting line.

You are looking to represent us all. Prove you are qualified or GET THE HELL OUT.

Obviously I'm talking rhetorically to Osama Obama and not you pissant. As a matter of fact, I think we should call BHO Pissant and not you!

209 posted on 10/23/2008 6:30:55 PM PDT by politicalmerc (NObama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swiss
And those divorce records had been sealed by the only parties to whom they were relevant. On the other hand BC are PUBLIC records. The probability has become much higher than Zero is ineligible for the Presidency and the Senate and is willing to risk a Constitutional Crisis second only to the unpleasantries of 1861-5.
210 posted on 10/23/2008 6:37:03 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: All

Does anyone know where, “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation” came from? It is in the article and it sounds as if they are referencing some legal docs, but where are THOSE? We need to see the official wording.


211 posted on 10/23/2008 6:46:41 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chickpundit
Perhaps his full given name is really Muhammad Osama Hussein Obama ;)

Actually, his full given name was Hussein Osama Muhammad Obama, but after a grueling bullied childhood, he rearranged the components of his name. Probably another "embarrassment" t hing for him.

212 posted on 10/23/2008 6:55:18 PM PDT by C210N (The television has mounted the most serious assault on Republicanism since Das Kapital.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
As far I as know state election officials must certify that the candidates for public office qualify. Probably it is like most “certifications” by public officials and is a half-assed thing. But certification of eligility from the Electoral College would not be.

After the state electors vote the results are sent to the President of the Senate, Cheney, who announces the official winner of the election. Presumably, Cheney could ask the Supreme Court for a ruling on eligibility.

As to the past after the expiration of the initial grace period for a potential foreign born president expired (i.e. those moving here after 1773) all other presidents had well established backgrounds generally from families of distinction and certainty. Alexander Hamilton was one of the Founders (maybe the only one) who could have potentially been president though foreign born. But Jefferson and Burr made sure he would not be by exposing the scandalous Reynolds affair.

Lincoln probably had about the most obscure origins of any of the other presidents but even his were fairly clear.

213 posted on 10/23/2008 7:01:08 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: danamco

If you are implying a slithering of Hillary into the Office via the law suit, it would not be easy, or possible to do so before the election. And it would not work when the Blacks went nuts.


214 posted on 10/23/2008 7:05:25 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: plangent
Could be as simple that Mom and Pop were listed as never married.

If so, that makes Barack a B........

Not only a B........, but a RAT B.........

215 posted on 10/23/2008 9:39:27 PM PDT by libs_kma (NOBAMA. Keep the change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
If you are implying a slithering of Hillary into the Office via the law suit, it would not be easy, or possible to do so before the election. And it would not work when the Blacks went nuts.

I agree with you 100%. Whatever the rats are trying to do in this election, if Nobama is removed, it is a loosing situation in the wake as how many top in the (D's) "latter" will be serving time together with illegal alien!!!

216 posted on 10/23/2008 10:19:58 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Swiss
I recall some embarrassing divorce records he wanted made public of his opponent.

MOST insightful of you!

I can't think of anything that would be more just, than to have 0bama brought down by the release of his own personal records.

217 posted on 10/23/2008 11:13:21 PM PDT by happygrl (we are all plumbers now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
fortunately someone else did and they faxed a copy to the aircraft)

Did thye have faxes then ?

Or was this teletype?

Hey, I've taken lessons from Buckhead...

218 posted on 10/23/2008 11:36:29 PM PDT by happygrl (we are all plumbers now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Presumably, Cheney could ask the Supreme Court for a ruling on eligibility.

Would you people knock it off with the courts?

Courts have no Constitutional role in elections, and shouldn't.

The Founders created a specific procedure for counting electoral votes and declaring a winner. The body which exists for that purpose is a special joint session of Congress, which MUST carry out this function before proceeding to other business.

Challenges must come from the floor, and must be in writing. The President of the Senate (Cheney, before 1/20/09) rules on the challenges. He doesn't have to ask anybody "for a ruling", because HE MAKES THE RULING.

Of course, his rulings can be overturned by the special joint session, as they undoubtedly would be in the case of a challenge to 0bama's eligibility.

All of the questions which swirl around disputes over electors and the counting of their votes are political questions, and in more normal times would be considered nonjusticeable.

Since 1954, we've had a Supreme Court which does not recognize nonjusticeability. But that doesn't mean that conservatives should go running to the court, affirming its invented role as supreme arbiter of any serious social disagreement.

Our election are none of their g-d business. They should stay the hell out of it.

The Article II-XII Amendment process is perfectly adequate to this task.

219 posted on 10/24/2008 4:19:22 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered...the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

There is not one word in the Constitution regarding ballots cast for an ineligible person. Cheney would “...in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall be counted,...”

Now how the states certify the certificates is not referenced. Do we know that that certification process will not involve the Courts, state and/or federal? No we do not. If the certifications are challenged by a citizen
are you claiming that courts will not get involved?

What is required in a state certification of the electors’ vote? Nothing in the Constitution tells us. Do you know the 50 different states’ methods of doing so.

We are entering a murky area here never entered before and the Founders NEVER believed that an ineligible candidate would get this far. No one has greater respect for them than I and their writings have been carefully studied.

As the Courts were involved in preventing the attempted Democrat fraud in the 2000 election it is unrealistic to believe they would not should Zero be shown to be ineligible. Rude responses to those attempting to reason their way through this labyrinth does not change any of this.


220 posted on 10/24/2008 11:22:24 AM PDT by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson