Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden: 2 years ago Obama spoke out against Fannie Mae

Posted on 10/03/2008 6:21:56 PM PDT by hecht

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: hecht

Words, Just Words...


41 posted on 10/03/2008 7:05:36 PM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BIOCHEMKY; hecht

I read the letter a few weeks ago when he started stumping with it, so I cheated. I googled “Obama letter Federal Reserve.”


42 posted on 10/03/2008 7:05:47 PM PDT by Pan_Yan (All gray areas are fabrications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pieces of time

Sorry, I missed your post. Search ‘Obama letter Federal Reserve’ and it’ll come up in about a half dozen places.


43 posted on 10/03/2008 7:08:40 PM PDT by Pan_Yan (All gray areas are fabrications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

The statement was only five months off, making it fairly close to the truth . . . by Biden standards.


44 posted on 10/03/2008 7:11:15 PM PDT by Pan_Yan (All gray areas are fabrications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
Actually, if it’s real, doesn’t sound half bad.

...summit participants should also evaluate options for independent loan counseling, voluntary loan restructuring, limited forbearance, and other possible workout strategies.

He is complaining about home foreclosures and wants the debt forgiven. Socialist drivel and says nothing about bad underwriting by the GSEs.

45 posted on 10/03/2008 7:18:19 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: B-Cause

Biden also looks like a used car saleman

I disagree. He looks like a Chinese used car salesman.


46 posted on 10/03/2008 7:20:55 PM PDT by Misschuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Thanks for the link. I’d prefer to see a source other than Obama’s own website to verify the date it was written and I see you provided the search words you used in a later post. Appreciate it.


47 posted on 10/03/2008 7:24:29 PM PDT by pieces of time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: claymax
This says nothing about Fannie mae and freddie mac, nor about the impending crisis we have. And it wasn't 2 years ago, it was written March 22, 2007, about the time this mess started. Nice try on trying to make Obama look like he had the foresight, but I am sure many Dems were doing the same because at this time, doom was imminent

It was a letter to hold a summit to "talk" about fighting foreclosures.
48 posted on 10/03/2008 7:25:39 PM PDT by igoramus08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
”Finishing that thought, perhaps one of the “investigative” reporters up in Alaska can take their head out of the dumpster long enough to FOIA the letter.”

LOL ..Great point, I think they like their heads exactly where they are.

49 posted on 10/03/2008 7:26:32 PM PDT by ArchAngel1983 (Arch Angel- on guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: igoramus08

Nevertheless, a consortium of industry-related service providers and public interest advocates may be able to bring quick and efficient relief to millions of at-risk homeowners and neighborhoods, even before Congress has had an opportunity to act.

This is a CYA letter, if it was sent. Note that he wants to get “public interst advocates” or Acorn mortgage counselors to “bring quick and efficient relief to millions of at-risk homeowners and neighborhoods, even before Congress has had an opportunity to act. Even here Obama is pimping off Acorn and “community activists”.


50 posted on 10/03/2008 7:31:27 PM PDT by Moorka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
what alarms me by the letter is the focus on the homeowner. While this may seem compassionate, it treats a symptom not the cause. The problem is GSE’s and the CRA. He does not focus on the cause, I assume because it is in his agenda to have maintained the status quo.
It's time to name names. If McCain wont, talk=radio, OReilly and Freeper will have to.
51 posted on 10/03/2008 7:34:09 PM PDT by hecht (shana tova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
”The statement was only five months off, making it fairly close to the truth . . . by Biden standards."

”If it walks like a Democrat and quacks like a Democrat... It's probably a Democrat trying to duck the truth.”

Ya have to admit, it’s an oldie but a goodie.

52 posted on 10/03/2008 7:36:21 PM PDT by ArchAngel1983 (Arch Angel- on guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

What’s the date of the letter? yesterday?


53 posted on 10/03/2008 7:42:56 PM PDT by okokie (40 days of Prayer and fasting to end abortion Sept 24-Nov 2 http://www.40daysforlife.com/splash.cfm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
Actually, if it’s real, doesn’t sound half bad.

Where does he refer to the need for stricter limits on subprime lending?
54 posted on 10/03/2008 7:55:08 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (`Pontius Pilate voted "Present")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hecht
The letter is focusing almost exclusively on the symptom and not the cause. From the first paragraph,
Because regulators are partly responsible for creating the environment that is leading to rising rates of home foreclosure in the subprime mortgage market,
It is obvious that Obama is concerned with the failure of the regulators to respond with help for the borrowers facing foreclosure. He is not concerned with the fact that Fannie and Freddie were encouraging loans that never should have been made. It was only by increasing these bad loans that they were able to keep the scam going. Obama didn't want the loans stopped because once it stopped they knew it would collapse.
55 posted on 10/03/2008 8:00:11 PM PDT by eggman (Obama is now The Zero. He used to be The One but he added Biden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: okokie

March 22, 2007.


56 posted on 10/03/2008 8:19:43 PM PDT by Pan_Yan (All gray areas are fabrications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

“Where does he refer to the need for stricter limits on subprime lending?”

How about here:

“What standards investors should require of lenders, particularly with regard to verification of income and assets and the underwriting of borrowers based on fully indexed and fully amortized rates.”


57 posted on 10/04/2008 10:02:21 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson