Posted on 10/20/2007 10:25:34 AM PDT by Eva
Yes, Hillary has been working the Chinese Money Train for a long time. Thanks for reminding us.
Funny, I missed this one last night! Very nice.
. Servers acting up again
I’m sorry you’re having trouble today!
I’m sorry your thread didn’t get posted in the news/activism slot. It IS news. ;-(
BUMP!!
Hey, if you make a new thread, compiling all the links again, along with the new ones, maybe the moderators will leave it under the news/activism slot.
BUMP!!
I think that the moderators don’t want anything that will distract from their jihad against Rudy Giuliani.
Then my question is....should we be focused on publicizing the illegal activities NOW, or are the mods waiting until after hillary possibly gets the nomination. ???? I remember when it was OKAY to post info that exposed previous clinton ‘antics’ while they were in office. Why NOT be proactive prior to the primaries? :(
Also, while I think the following is an interesting thread
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1914326/posts
I would question which thread is worthy of the “news” section.
Sorry if any offense is taken to the creator of the other thread.
Yes, we should be focused on the illegal campaign funding because it is indicative of the corruption that characterized the whole Clinton administration and if we allow it to continue, it as though we are condoning it. It sets a precedent. It may not be illegal for Hillary to accept these donations that are passed through other donors, but it is illegal for the donors. We need to prosecute a few of the fake donors.
I hate to be paranoid, but I can only assume that placing my thread in the blogging/personal section was an intentional slight because the articles that I posted did not come from a blog, they came from a legitimate news source, albeit a leftist news source, but still, a news source. I thought that fact that the criticism of Hillary was coming from the left made it more meaningful. I could have posted plenty of other sources that were running the same type of article, but I purposely chose the Nation Magazine.
Bump
bump-Someone should email this thread to Rush
Rush is reading these stories as we speak...(even the NY Post graphic). He’s saying—THE FBI SHOULD BE ON THIS RIGHT NOW!!!
The WSJ says that there is no controlling authority for Hillary, just like the Buddhist Temple/Al Gore thing. It is illegal only for the bundler.
John Fund was on Fox & Friends this morning discussing this story...I was shocked when he mentioned that it was not Clinton Inc.’s responsibility...how can that be?
Campaign finance laws, apparently only regulate the donors, not the politicians. They are aimed at limiting the influence of voters on the process. The stupid Republicans thought that they could limit the influence of unions, while the Democrats wanted to limit the influence of the grass root conservatives and the big corporate donors.
Thanks...so she’s getting away with this one, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.