Ron Paul Wins Big in Alabama(Landslide Republican Victory

Ron Paul (2008) ^ | August 18, 2007

[Poser]

Ron Paul is an insignificant twit who will not receive enough votes to make a difference in any state, much less win any primaries.

[philman_36]

Like I said...
You said something?

I must be doing something right. I'm drawing flies.

[bcsco]

Otherwise, mind your own business, arrogant horse’s patootie.

Notice how his post #282 is a confirmation of your remark?

These Paulistas are so entertaining.

[philman_36]

Aw now, you're supposed to flag somebody when you're talking trash about them.
Notice how his post #282 is a confirmation of your remark?
The remark prompted the post.
Thy wain preceedeth thy equine.

[End Times Crusader]

Insanity: The Final Frontier

[philman_36]

These Paulistas are so entertaining.
So are the chidish character assasination antics being deployed by the Paul haters. They're truly laughable.

[philman_36]

ops...chidish = childish
Damn the typos, full speed ahead!

[Clara Lou]

He thrives on audience and finds himself hugely amusing. He’s got an audience of one, anyway.

[Clara Lou]

ops...chidish = childish
stones...glass house
chickens...roost
pot...kettle

[bcsco]

Thy wain preceedeth thy equine.

Are you calling Clara Lou a cart or a horse?

Aw now, you're supposed to flag somebody when you're talking trash about them...The remark prompted the post.

But the post calling you an "arrogant horse’s patootie" came from Clara Lou, yet your post #282 was addressed to ejonesie22; why didn't you flag Clara Lou since the remark prompted the post? I was simply following your post protocol. And you fell for it!

[philman_36]

Ah, more bad manners.
He thrives on audience and finds himself hugely amusing.
Oh WOW, you can tell all that through your computer screen? That must be way better than a crystal ball!
He’s got an audience of one, anyway.
The last few posts belie your statement. It would seem that I've got more than one person in attendance.

[bcsco]

Damn the typos, full speed ahead!

Kinda like what you were criticizing ejonesie22 for earlier, I'd say.

[philman_36]

Kinda like what you were criticizing ejonesie22 for earlier, I'd say.
Ah, misrepresentation. I guess that's to be expected.
There were more than mere typos involved. Go back and read it again.
And thanks for taking the bait.

[ejonesie22]

I was thinking self portraiture..

[philman_36]

Let's roll the tape...just in case...

After looking at a great many of your posts you have a continual habit of using the wrong words, not using the right words and various other errors.
In this instance you used "with in" as two seperate words instead of one word as it should be. Now if this was a seperate incident I would attribute it to nothing more than a simple typo.

You see, there is no criticism for typos. As I said, misrepresentation.

[ejonesie22]

Oh my God!

You made a..
a..
a..

MISTAKE!!!!

Yu must be one of those funny humans..

[philman_36]

I was thinking self portraiture..
I was thinking accurate depiction of what I'm doing...swatting flies.

[philman_36]

I was thinking self portraiture..
I was thinking accurate depiction of what I'm doing...swatting flies.

[ejonesie22]

Thy wain preceedeth thy equine.

Cool, you can Google a Thesaurus...

[bcsco]

And thanks for taking the bait.

You didn't bait anyone.

There were more than mere typos involved. Go back and read it again.

No need to. ejonesie22 addressed those remarks you thoughtlessly made. Oh, and you again failed to flag someone you are referring to in this post (ejonesie22). Not very good at following a protocol you hold others accountable to, are you?

Now I have to run. Better things to do beside post to a jerk like yourself.