Posted on 09/12/2006 7:21:11 PM PDT by freedom44
The moonbats newscaster.
When a liberal wants to make a fool of themselves....let them!
I can't even believe what I just watched. Keith Olbermann is seriously disturbed. The fact that ANY TV station could give airtime to that is beyond me.
obviously pretty bitter about losing his job there,too, from his foaming mouth denunciations of Disney and the Path to 9/11
Doesn't Dan Patrick refer to Keith as a "friend" of his?
Thanks for posting, that was truly funny.
My note to MSNBC:
MSNBC,
I just viewed, on the Internet, Keith Olbermann’s attack on President Bush. Seldom does one see nine minutes of such animus and delusions aired publicly. It was great!
Really, how is President Bush responsible for rebuilding the World Trade Center? If the President stepped in and took control of rebuilding, Olbermann would be the first, and correctly in that case, to complain about usurping the property rights and responsibilities of the property owner(s), the City and State of New York.
I’m sure that many people will be demanding that Keith be removed for such a stupid diatribe, and you may even be considering that, as America laughs at MSNBC and Keith, but I urge you to resist.
Please rearrange the MSNBC schedule and put Keith on as many hours of prime time as possible. The bark at the Moon liberals will love it and you’ll capture many conservative viewers too, as they will want to watch the lunacy live, as it happens. MSNBC will gain lots of exposure as video clips and transcripts of Keith are shared throughout the Internet. True we’ll all be laughing hilariously at MSNBC and Keith, but the old saw, any publicity is good publicity, comes into play here.
More prime time Keith Olbermann will also have a direct effect on the political elections too. Viewers seeing the vacuous mind of a demented Moonbat liberal close up will really fire up the base Republican voters and bring many new voters to the Republicans as well.
Laughing,
RJL
Drudge posts them on a weekly basis. MSNBC's numbers are deplorable.
Leftists always have to resort to these over the top, extreme arguments rather than just a presentation of the facts as they can, and have every right to, marshall them; I agree, they drive people away, and that's why republicans aren't going to lose Congress, even though they may deserve to.
*supressing a lol*
The monuments there were erected decades later, and very few if any by the US government. That federalism concept is clearly beyond the writers comprehension....
lol
ping for later
If you stop listening to him MSNBC will drop 5% in its viewing audience. Jonah Goldberg of NRO once referred to him as "the thinking man's idiot or the idiot's thinking man".
He's so bad he actually makes Chris Matthews look like he's of average intelligence!
I stopped viewing after he hammered the president for not having begun construction on the WTC site. The snafus and delays are purely a function of the fact that the WTC site itself is the most complex intersection of STATE and LOCAL jurisdictional matters one could conceive. The federal government has opened a spigot of money - there is no delay that the feds are responsible for. It's a local NY battle and Olbermann is quite stupid not to recognize that.
At least "school bus" Nagin had the decency to apologize for his assinine remark about the "hole in the ground".
I saw a program on C-Span about that and the engineering and construction difficulties are incredible. Just hauling away the debris was a Herculean task - it makes the building of the Great Pyramid look like a small project.
But what else can one expect from a moron like Olbermann?
Hi, I will confess this is rather a drive-by because I came upon this site by pure accident and will probably never find my way back....
Having said that, while they are now reporters exactly, do the names Armstrong Williams and Maggie Gallagher not ring a bell? Sheeesh.
Hi, I will confess this is rather a drive-by because I came upon this site by pure accident and will probably never find my way back....
Having said that, while they are not reporters exactly, do the names Armstrong Williams and Maggie Gallagher not ring a bell? Sheeesh.
Well, then Keith needs to state those names. I respect you more than Keith because you back up your argument. I know It was only a nine minute commentary, but when outrageous or inflammatory comments are made, the reporter/commentator needs to back it up with facts. I don't care who is doing it--left, right, or mushy middle. The lack of facts in the commentary is bad enough; his vitriol is unprofessional. It is FALLACY to make make an argument based on conclusions and emotion without facts (and a manipulative trick at that). REASONING 101.
The two people you mentioned were indeed mistakes, and there should have been full disclosure. Apart from that, I have no problem with any administration hiring people who have a passion about a certian issue to champion it. Who else would you want as an advocate for your favorite issues? Just disclose it.
Anyway, what does buying off reporters/writers with respect to "No Child Left Behind" and the National Fatherhood Initiative have to do with 9-11? It was irresponsible for Keith to give the impression that the Bush administration is buying off reporters/writers with respect to 9-11/WOT. It was framed it that way in his commentary--you know it, I know it, we all know it.
Sheesh! (Oops, there's that emotion again.)
LOL! I must admit....I lit a few of those olbermann filled bags myself, also decorated a few trees with olbermann paper in my youth.
And it's coming up on that time of year again!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.