Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The President has all the legal cover he needs to save Terri!!!

Posted on 03/24/2005 1:01:14 PM PST by Joe the truth

The President has Legal cover to save Terri. (you have got to read this and pass it to everybody)


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: president; saveterri; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Tamatoa
What we need is simply the will to enforce the law, this is the biggest scandal in American legal history when you look at the evidence that never was even looked at in this case it is simply disgusting, when you look at the fact that only one judge has reviewed this case not two not three judges only one judge. One judge against the congress and the American people decided to starve a Conscious human being to death. Unbelievable!!!!!!
41 posted on 03/24/2005 2:35:58 PM PST by Joe the truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: Joe the truth

HOW ABOUT AN EXECUTIVE ORDER TO PUT IN A FEEDING TUBE SO HER UNALIENABLE RIGHT TO LIVE WONT BE VIOLATED BY THE COURTS WHO ARE TRYING TO ALIENATE HER RIGHT TO LIVE.
LET TERRI CONTINUE TO LIVE WITH DIGNITY, RATHER THAN STARVING HER TO DEATH BECAUSE ARYANS ARE OFFENDED BY HER DISABILITY.


43 posted on 03/24/2005 2:41:19 PM PST by 8- BALL HEAD (UNALIENABLE RIGHT TO LIFE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wild Bill 10
Once a man ABANDONS his wife, lives in an adultriss(illegal) relationship with another woman, and sires two bastard kids with her it hardly qualifies him to be the "husband" making life and death decisions for her.

Well then let me ask you something.... why haven't the courts (and the courts have made 20 some odd decisions in this case) revoked his guardianship? Why isn't there a petition in front of the courts RIGHT NOW to revoke his guardianship? I'll tell you why... because there is no legal basis for revoking his guardianship.

The law doesn't state that a husband will be his wife's legal guardian unless he's found guilty of being a louse in the court of public opinion.

44 posted on 03/25/2005 5:35:34 AM PST by ironmike4242
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson