Posted on 02/12/2005 3:02:24 AM PST by thelastvirgil
Two of the best sources for all things "Social" are The Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute. Below is a URL for info on Social Insecurity. Also as an aside, komrade clintax expanded Social Security Supplemental Income for drug addicts. Not only did the druggies receive this but also in arrears, while in prison and in lump sum. The enterprising lawyers also got the taxpayers to pay the legal fees. Some of these enterprising pukes used the lump sum distribution to start meth factories.
http://www.heritage.org/Research/SocialSecurity/wm662.cfm
Sheesh. Did you even look at #8?
Well, that helps a lot. I suppose, anecdotally, we all see cases of folks scamming the system, but I am talking about a real-life issue.
It is a pretty complicated and time-consuming process for a person to qualify for ssdi. It is not a simple matter of reporting in to the local ss office, and saying "I'm too sick or crippled to work". Applicants are screened closely, and medical records are thoroughly checked. SS has the right -- responsibility -- to verify any claims of disability, and as far as I know, they do a good job.
I doubt the criteria include an applicant's appearing disabled to the neighbors is one of those. Thanks for your "input", but I'm trying to get facts.
I am not writing as a "neighbor" but as a professional who runs into way too many SSDI collectors who should be kicked off the dole. Should everyone? Of course not, but there are enough who need to find a job. How do people get SSDI. They get a lawyer ....
Don't worry, sir; it's a free-and-rough bunch in here; just sift through the rough comments and pick out the gems.
It's Free Republic, it just gets this way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.