Skip to comments.
"Guru of Ganja" (Ed Rosenthal) convicted of marijuana cultivation
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 01/31/03
| DAVID KRAVETS
Posted on 01/31/2003 3:28:07 PM PST by MikalM
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:41:45 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 521-526 next last
To: Roscoe
Included charges for crimes other than marijuana possession.
No, it says quite clearly that it concerns a specific program...in 2000 the DEA program for eradicating domestic marijuana resulted in the destruction of 2.8 million plants in 40,929 plots, 9,439 arrests, 3,463 weapons seized, and assets seized valued at $19.3 million.
It doesn't say anything else about anything else.
Please show me where it says what you say it says.
To: Roscoe
Oh, BTW, keep this in mind while perusing this info...
According to the UCR, (Uniform Crime Reports) drug abuse violations are defined as State and/or local offenses relating to the unlawful possession, sale, use, growing, manufacturing, and making of narcotic drugs including opium or cocaine and their derivatives, marijuana, synthetic narcotics, and dangerous nonnarcotic drugs such as barbiturates.That definition clause helps. The info is direct and correct only when you read it rightly in light of that.
Got to read this stuff closely.
To: Roscoe
Well, what do you know...
DEA Arrests - Year 2001Cocaine = 12,165
Heroin = 2,969
Cannabis = 5,156
Meth = 6,572
LSD = 70
MDMA = 1,893
Other = 1,819
Total = 30,644Hmmmmmm...funky math!
To: Roscoe
To: Trailerpark Badass; Roscoe
Not in California. The average user has no interaction whatsoever with any level of law enforcement, and the last arrest for mere possession or use happened over 30 years ago.
To: philman_36
Cannabis = 5,156 Divided by 50 weeks in a year and 52 states equals 1.98 arrests per state per week.
Thanks.
346
posted on
02/01/2003 11:15:38 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Divided by 50 weeks in a year and 52 states equals 1.98 arrests per state per week.
Funky math indeed!
Maybe in your alternate universe!
This universe has 52 weeks and 50 states.
To: philman_36
Divided by 52 weeks in a year and 50 states equals 1.98 arrests per state per week, as opposed to 1.98 arrests per state per week.
Thanks again.
348
posted on
02/01/2003 11:23:28 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
I will agree with the 1.98 though, as a per state per week average.
What do you think about the possession statement?
You know...the "more than 4/5ths" one.
To: Cultural Jihad
The average user has no interaction whatsoever with any level of law enforcement, and the last arrest for mere possession or use happened over 30 years ago. I guess Rosenthal's commercial warehouse filled 1,000+ plants intended for sale was a bit more than mere possession. :)
350
posted on
02/01/2003 11:35:44 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Then there is always the
United States Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
DOMESTIC CANNABIS ERADICATION/SUPPRESSION PROGRAM (DCE/SP)The DCE/SP is the sole nationwide law enforcement program that exclusively addresses marijuana. DEA coordinates the program by completing Letters of Agreement (grant like funding contracts) with state and local law enforcement agencies, in response to their operational plan to combat illicit marijuana and conduct suppression programs in their states. The state DEA DCE/SP coordinator and the lead state agency coordinator plan the utilization of the funds for the best eradication operation possible for their states.Snip...
DEA and the cooperating agencies meet the challenge of increased indoor and outdoor cultivation operations by employing advanced technologies, like remote sensing devices, Global Positioning System (G. P. S.) locator technology and thermal imagery, to build effective cases against these violators. In addition, DEA Special Agents, along with their state and local counterparts, have developed innovative investigative and analysis techniques to achieve and maintain their investigative superiority. The Special Team, multi-agency, multi-state eradication and enforcement effort has several high concentration operations: Operation Four Corners, (Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, and Missouri) Operation Deep Strike (Florida Georgia and Alabama), Operation Grand Slam, (Kentucky, West Virginia, Virginia, Ohio, and Tennessee), Operation Wipe Out (Hawaii), and Operation Emerald Triangle (California). These operations not only target the eradication of plots and plants but lead to case building and arrests of the growers.Snip...
Year |
Plants Seized |
|
|
Assets Seized |
|
Cultivated |
Ditchweed |
Indoor |
|
1992 |
7.5 mil |
264.0 mil |
349,275 |
$69 million |
1993 |
4.1 mil |
388.0 mil |
290,453 |
$52 million |
1994 |
4.0 mil |
504.4 mil |
218,982 |
$56 million |
1995 |
3.0 mil |
370.0 mil |
277,232 |
$42 million |
1996 |
3.0 mil |
420.0 mil |
217,194 |
$37.9 million |
1997 |
3.8 mil |
237.0 mil |
225,232 |
$39.5 million |
1998 |
2.2 mil |
132.4 mil |
232,839 |
$29.3 million |
1999 |
3.4 mil |
130.1 mil |
208,027 |
$26.9 million |
2000 |
2.8 mil |
139.5 mil |
217,105 |
$19.2 million |
Who gets to claim the arrests, or do they all go to the State's count(?) and
why is so much time, effort and money being spent on eradicating mere ditchweed?
Funky math!
To: Roscoe
I guess Rosenthal's commercial warehouse filled 1,000+ plants intended for sale was a bit more than mere possession.
Got a link for that? I understood that he was giving the plants away, not selling any. I'd be interested in where it was stated that he was growing them to sell.
To: Roscoe
Have you seen that case I linked before? It's got some interesting stuff in there.
To: Cultural Jihad
Not in California. The average user has no interaction whatsoever with any level of law enforcement, and the last arrest for mere possession or use happened over 30 years ago. Leaving aside the fact that I don't live in California, the "average user" likely faces far stiffer penalities if he wishes to avoid funding potentially criminal enterprises by cultivating his own supply.
You've heard of CAMP, of course.
To: Cultural Jihad
Not in California. The average user has no interaction whatsoever with any level of law enforcement, and the last arrest for mere possession or use happened over 30 years ago. Also, do you have a cite for your assertion. Since possession is still listed as a misdemeanor in California, with more than an ounce bringing 6 months in the can, I would find it remarkable that no one has been arrested in 30 years.
Not saying you pulled that out of your ass, though.
To: philman_36
"Rosenthal is on trial in U.S. District Court in San Francisco on charges of marijuana cultivation and conspiracy. The charges stem from a business he ran growing marijuana to be sold for medicinal uses under the auspices of the city of Oakland's medical marijuana ordinance, one of many such municipal statutes in California."http://www.startribune.com/stories/484/3611609.html
356
posted on
02/02/2003 12:04:23 AM PST
by
Roscoe
To: philman_36
"The DEA contends that Rosenthal is using Prop. 215 as a smokescreen for drug profiteering, and prosecutors trying the case have attempted to turn growers and club operators against each other. When Hayes fled to Canada, his medical marijuana club underwent the same upheaval that many businesses endure when a founder suddenly leaves. But prosecutors moved to take advantage of the turmoil. ''The feds are using us as an example to scare all these other dispensers of medical cannabis into submission,'' said Ken Hayes, who is seeking political asylum in Canada. ''I didn't want to be used as a federal government trophy.''
Former club employee Robert Martin, who was forced to testify under a grant of immunity, alleged that Hayes drew down the club's accounts to pay for his exile. Bills went unpaid and the power was shut off. Martin, who now runs another medical marijuana club, began covering expenses out of his own pocket, but testified that he wrote Rosenthal bad checks for his plants because he believed Rosenthal was attempting to take over the operation. The prosecution then produced an unsigned letter to Rosenthal, seized from Watts' computer. The letter suggests that Rosenthal was selling bug-infested plants as an act of ''willfull sabotage'' to infect other growers and corner the medical marijuana market, a charge Rosenthal denies."
http://santafenewmexican.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=6877189&BRD=2144&PAG=461&dept_id=367954&rfi=6
357
posted on
02/02/2003 12:11:13 AM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
To: Roscoe
They can contend all they want. Was he charged on it? Was he convicted of it?. From what I've read the answer to both is no.
To: philman_36
"...testified that he wrote Rosenthal bad checks for his plants..."
I understood that he was giving the plants away, not selling any.
Source?
360
posted on
02/02/2003 12:37:12 AM PST
by
Roscoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 521-526 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson