Skip to comments.
Judge takes swing at war on drugs
Rocky Mountain News ^
| January 29, 2003
| Karen Abbott
Posted on 01/30/2003 6:38:26 AM PST by MrLeRoy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-369 next last
To: WORLD SUCKELS USAS BREAST
"our present policies encourage children to take drugs." Reread for comprehension: "Removing penalties for selling to adults, while retaining them for selling to children, will give them an economic incentive to not sell to children---namely, the risk of losing their legal adult business."
Based upon his answers he rules from the bench consistant with his opinion.
That is a lie; the article says nothing about his rulings.
21
posted on
01/30/2003 7:06:34 AM PST
by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
To: Dane
Do you even know what court she sits on?Testy aren't you?
So that would be a no. Got it.
22
posted on
01/30/2003 7:07:25 AM PST
by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
To: Dane
"drugs are benign" "super" jurist, Judge Kane.Please show where Judge Kane said anything remotely like "drugs are benign"; that appears to be merely your baldfaced lie.
23
posted on
01/30/2003 7:08:47 AM PST
by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
To: WORLD SUCKELS USAS BREAST
Again, what is the policy that makes drug dealers sell to children.? It's the lack of policy that encourages them to sell to anyone, including children. How many illegal beer sellers willing to sell to children are there?
To: FreeTally
What a dumbass. Funny. I was thinking the exact same thing while reading your screed.
I'll second that ....
25
posted on
01/30/2003 7:13:24 AM PST
by
clamper1797
(Per Caritate Viduaribus Orphanibusque Sed Prime Viduaribus)
To: MrLeRoy
Did you ever get the apology I sent you some time ago ... If not ...
I offer it again
26
posted on
01/30/2003 7:16:27 AM PST
by
clamper1797
(Per Caritate Viduaribus Orphanibusque Sed Prime Viduaribus)
To: Dane
Of course the dirty little secret of this thread is that Judge Kane was appointed in 1977, that means appointed by Jimmy Carter.
Another dirty little secret is a republican appointed panel told Nixon this WosD was stupid in the 70's.
Let's have a real investigation into the Dallas coverup last year, show our drug warriors in their true light.
27
posted on
01/30/2003 7:18:21 AM PST
by
steve50
To: MrLeRoy
So that would be a no. Got it Sandra Day O'Connor serves on the Supreme Court.
Her fellow justices are Renquist, Thomas, Scalia, Kennedy, Breyer, Stevens, Souter, and Ginsberg.
Sheesh you are a loud mouthed testy person, but what else should I expect from a person who holds a Jimmy Carter appointee in such "high" esteem.
28
posted on
01/30/2003 7:19:19 AM PST
by
Dane
To: Dane
Judge Kane is a Jimmy Carter liberal . . .Yes, indeed. That's because the ideology of pro-doperism is a socialist cause--not a conservative cause.
To: MrLeRoy
Last I looked, booze and smokes are still legal - how much of a deterrent is that to keeping kids from doing them?
30
posted on
01/30/2003 7:23:49 AM PST
by
trebb
To: FreeTally
Bump.
31
posted on
01/30/2003 7:27:49 AM PST
by
alex
To: trebb
Last I looked, booze and smokes are still legal - how much of a deterrent is that to keeping kids from doing them? There's a difference between keeping kids frm doing something, and keeping kids from personally buying something. There are penalties for selling beer and cigs to minors, and stores won't do it. It was much easier for me to get marijuana in high school than it was to get beer or smokes - go figure. You tell me why.
32
posted on
01/30/2003 7:28:16 AM PST
by
realpatriot71
(legalize freedom!)
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
To: Nathaniel Fischer
Who appointed Justices Stevens and Souter? How about Byron White, one of the more conservative judges on the court before he retired? Ford appointed Stevens and Bush 41 appointed Souter and I beleive it was Kennedy who appointed Byron White.
So? That doesn't change the fact that Carter appointed Judge Kane is following a major tenet of the modern American left and that is the tenet of drug validation.
34
posted on
01/30/2003 7:34:31 AM PST
by
Dane
To: MrLeRoy
The thing I like best about your posts is that they reflect your wide variety of interests.
35
posted on
01/30/2003 7:40:30 AM PST
by
IncPen
( God as my witness I thought turkeys could fly!)
Comment #36 Removed by Moderator
To: Kevin Curry
Yes, indeed. That's because the ideology of pro-doperism is a socialist cause--not a conservative cause.Actually, it's a liberal cause.
37
posted on
01/30/2003 7:41:28 AM PST
by
IncPen
( God as my witness I thought turkeys could fly!)
To: trebb
Last I looked, booze and smokes are still legal - how much of a deterrent is that to keeping kids from doing them? Guess its time to start arresting the adults who smoke and drink. That should keep it away from the kiddies.
38
posted on
01/30/2003 7:42:10 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Dane
That doesn't change the fact that Carter appointed Judge Kane is following a major tenet of the modern American left and that is the tenet of drug validation.Dane, Dane, Dane. Once again, you're doing your feeble best to deflect to debate, in this instance trying to apply the liberal label to anyone in favor of changing the federal drug war. Despite the wide range of figures on the right who are questioning the approach the feds are taking towards drugs, you insist that it's all just a bunch of liberal hooey, as if anyone except a few of your cohorts on FR believes you. But go ahead, spew your nonsense, because more and more people in positions of power and influence are questioning the insanity of doing more and more of what is failing.
In other words, better sane ... than Dane.
39
posted on
01/30/2003 7:42:45 AM PST
by
dirtboy
To: realpatriot71
Probably a libertine too.
40
posted on
01/30/2003 7:43:19 AM PST
by
Jason_b
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-369 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson