Judge's level of secrecy in proceedings raises questions from experts

Ok, we're on the same page.
You list some of the other things i didn't bother to detail.

81 posted on 09/26/2002 2:03:53 PM PDT by dread78645

Southwest, which has a zero-tolerance drug policy, fired Kemal in June after she testified in the nationally televised murder trial.

Southwest didn't catch Denise using, exactly... so it isn't exactly zero-tolerance?

82 posted on 09/26/2002 2:16:34 PM PDT by let freedom sing

To: let freedom sing

The ONLY reason, that she was rehired, was because of the union...wait til someone tries to fire one of the new airport security screeners, it'll take years and in the meantime that person will be responsible for YOUR safety.

83 posted on 09/26/2002 2:21:49 PM PDT by demsux

To: let freedom sing

We're supposed to applaud her for telling the truth, finally. But she's suppose to get a pass on breaking the rules. She probably signed something that says she can be terminated for drug use. The probably don't catch alot of the attendants in the rest room taking a few puffs. You know that joint can last weeks that way.

Maybe the FAA should look in to this.

84 posted on 09/26/2002 2:25:20 PM PDT by Jaded

#84...She told the truth, or her version of it, because they caught her in the lies.

She has so little respect for the truth, I sure wouldn't want her working for my airline!

85 posted on 09/26/2002 2:28:29 PM PDT by Guenevere

Here's a question: Why was the FBI involved in the initial search of DW's home? Remember Agent YOUNGFLESH, he found the kiddie porn.

86 posted on 09/26/2002 2:47:58 PM PDT by demsux

To: Guenevere; demsux; Jaded

SW needs to hear from more than a few irate customers about how SW sacrificed zero-tolerance and passenger safety with union agreements and special favors. It's O'Reilly time.

87 posted on 09/26/2002 2:50:22 PM PDT by let freedom sing

To: let freedom sing

Better still-- SW should be Hannitized.

88 posted on 09/26/2002 2:52:43 PM PDT by let freedom sing

To: let freedom sing

2 votes for Hannitized!!!

89 posted on 09/26/2002 2:54:17 PM PDT by Guenevere

To: let freedom sing; Jaded

Besides, after O'Reilly's little grandstanding act the other week against Feldman......

..I definitely would not bring it to his attention!

90 posted on 09/26/2002 2:55:35 PM PDT by Guenevere

If David was found Not Guilty I bet she would not have gotten her job back...

91 posted on 09/26/2002 2:59:01 PM PDT by just me

hmmmm, yes, I would agree!!

92 posted on 09/26/2002 3:04:45 PM PDT by Guenevere

I could have found DAW guilty, but for the bug-guys and timeline.

The problem with the evidence against Westerfield is that most of it lends itself more towards pointing to innocence than guilt.

Motor home- The fingerprints, the two hairs and one drop of blood on the carpet and a spot on the jacket, all are compatible with a brief visit made to use the bathroom sink to wash out a cut or maybe she wanted to use the bathroom and wasn't aware she was bleeding. Jacket is in bathroom, possibly left there to dry.

The MH was in front of his house to be loaded for trips and to be cleaned afterwards. It's reasonable to assume he didn't close and lock the doors while loading and unloading MH. She had plenty of opportunities to enter MH.

No evidence of rape, the dogs should have picked up the scent of a girl on board for days. The fibers are not even worth mentioning since no source, except to say that it is hard to believe that fibers could be implanted in the headboard and yet no hair is found.

Where is she bleeding from, that it would get on his collar? Her mouth? There should have been alot more blood if he had knocked her teeth out. The absence of teeth seems to show that she had been dead a while before she was dumped at Dehesa. Giving them time to fall out. Like say a week to ten days.

The hairs in Westerfields bed show that the sheets weren't cleaned and evidence of rape should have been present. Lacking evidence of rape, an innocent explanation for the hairs is a reasonable assumption.

His weekend trip is evidence of a guy alone for the first time, trying to figure out what to do, than that of a murderer. Driving back home to fill his water tanks and coming back briefly that afternoon makes no sense, if guilty.

The porn is up to the individual to assign significance. To me the child porn is balanced by the small amount compared to the rest of it. I would think a true pedophile would have more. But that's my bias.

Gee, I haven't even got to the bug guys yet.

93 posted on 09/26/2002 4:39:57 PM PDT by CW_Conservative

To: CW_Conservative

You'll love the bug guys then.

94 posted on 09/26/2002 4:46:28 PM PDT by Jaded

Yeah, the bugspurts definitely have a different time frame than that of Duhseck.

If Duhseck ever uses bug evidence again, then he should be disbarred for "lying" to DW's jury, just like NO'Reilly contends Feldman did.

95 posted on 09/26/2002 4:54:29 PM PDT by demsux

I agree... Didn't he call it "junk science"?

96 posted on 09/26/2002 5:02:10 PM PDT by just me

He must not have thought of it as junk science when he hired two them. I've been over their methods and calculations, slight difference in assumptions between them made no difference to their mutual conclusion. DW couldn't have dumped the body.

The biggest junk science, was the mummification "expert" who claimed Danielle was dead before she went missing! That bit of "evidence was brought in just to show that some "experts" are total idiots. It worked.

97 posted on 09/26/2002 5:56:23 PM PDT by John Jamieson

The "20 witnesses" must have really been a bunch for the judge to throw them out. He let dogguy, and mummyguy in!

98 posted on 09/26/2002 6:01:33 PM PDT by John Jamieson

To: John Jamieson

and towtruckguy, as well

99 posted on 09/26/2002 6:02:11 PM PDT by demsux

Yes, I forgot about that gem.

100 posted on 09/26/2002 6:04:38 PM PDT by John Jamieson

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794