Puppet Man (Craziest Paul Ryan rant yet? You decide)

Blog Critics ^ | August 11, 2012 | Pam Messingham

[2ndDivisionVet]

What say you?

[Gene Eric]

Why is this bitter hag’s garbage tainting the archives of FR?

[DemforBush]

I say: Pam Messingham is a looney bird.

And a lousy writer, to boot. Nothing but straw men, emotional knee-jerk and selective memory (as in, all the those horrible, meanie Bush-era policies that Obama has chosen to extend) as far as the eye can see.

[ConservativeMind]

Paul doesn’t make Romney a “great,” or even “good” choice, but you sure can’t say Paul is as bad as Biden. With the VP slot really only serving as the Senate tie-breaker, fellow campaign debater, and the rare step-in for a presidential death, Mr. Ryan will have relatively little to contribute. That said, not voting for president, voting for 0bama, or voting for “Mickey Mouse” or the like will only help 0bama.

If you can’t vote for Romney due to conscience (pro-abortion, etc.), then stop paying your freaking taxes, because you are funding the same. Otherwise, it becomes obvious you are only a person of “conscience” when it is convenient.

Which means you are part of the problem and not part of the solution in any way.

[fieldmarshaldj]

Dreadful Vice-Presidents ? No mention in the article of Joe Biden, the world-class retard with ass hairs stapled to his scalp.

[mylife]

I am, sick of this shit

ABO!

[Cementjungle]

Advanced stage liberalism.

[Uncle Ivan]

Independents are smarter and above the propaganda. We search out the truth. We aren’t easily bought when pummeled by media. We look at everything, closely scrutinizing every move made by both parties, and then, with critical thinking skills fully intact, vote.

Nearly fell out of my chair laughing at this.

Indys are sheep.

[RC one]

If you can’t vote for Romney due to conscience (pro-abortion, etc.), then stop paying your freaking taxes, because you are funding the same.

I pay my taxes because I will go to jail if I don't. period. There's no law compelling me to vote for any person. I could have voted for any one of our potential candidates. Mitt Romney was the one candidate I could not vote for. Many agreed with me including the owner of this web site. I predicted he would get the nomination regardless of all that though. Many of my fellow freepers told me not to worry, that there was no way Romney would get the nomination. They were wrong. After South Carolina, I threw all my support to Newt Gingrich and informed anybody that read my posts that it was a choice between Newt or Romney. Nobody listened or cared. I was right of course. Newt was seen as not conservative enough so "real conservatives" threw their weight behind Rick "the spoiler" Santorum even after it was obvious that he was more interested in beating Newt than Mitt. Now I'm being told by supposed conservatives that I have to vote for Mitt Romney? Well, not only No, but HELL NO. I truly do not care who wins this election and nothing you or anybody else can say will change that. FMR

[Lancey Howard]

I admire your active participation here, but why on earth do you sometimes post useless crap like this? I understand that it’s good to know your enemy, but the kind of blithering idiocy secreted by this blogger Messingham yields nothing instructive. I mean, I don’t like cockroaches and rats any more than I like liberal simpletons, but I don’t need to know anything more about them other than that they must be crushed, flushed down the toilet, and forgotten.

There’s just nothing of interest in the childish rants of pigs like Messingham.
(shrug)

FRegards,
LH

[babyfreep]

She writes this piece to make us believe she'd even consider voting for any republican.

From the blog:

Hi, my name is Pam. I am an independent liberal. I believe in the protections and freedoms granted, and "supposedly protected," by the U.S. Constitution. I will promote Mom and Pop shops over "Corporate America." I am soft hearted, therefore there may be times you will read an emotional outcry from something or someone that simply touched my heart. ~Pam

Pam is far from "independent". She's more like an occutard.

[GeorgeWashingtonsGhost]

This article just wasted the precious black ink in my computer monitor. /s

[Talisker]

Independents are smarter and above the propaganda. We search out the truth. We aren’t easily bought when pummeled by media. We look at everything, closely scrutinizing every move made by both parties, and then, with critical thinking skills fully intact, vote.

For Hillary.

Obviously.

:: yawn ::

[WOSG]

Do not operate heavy equipment after doing drugs and liberalism.

[expat1000]

I’d say posting this garbage comes awfully close to trolling.

[Fresh Wind]

Independents are smarter and above the propaganda.

But not above authoring propaganda, right?

[rawcatslyentist]

>"Why is this bitter hag’s garbage tainting the archives of FR?"

Ditto

[Tucker39]

“Independents are smarter and above the propaganda. We search out the truth. We aren’t easily bought when pummeled by media. We look at everything, closely scrutinizing every move made by both parties, and then, with critical thinking skills fully intact, vote.”

Do you reckon that’s why they voted for Zero in ‘08? ROFLMAO

[itsahoot]

I threw all my support to Newt Gingrich and informed anybody that read my posts that it was a choice between Newt or Romney. Nobody listened or cared. I was right of course.

I threw all my support to Rick Santorum and informed anybody that read my posts that it was a choice between Santorum or Romney. Nobody listened or cared. I was right of course, because if Newt had dropped out of only the states that Rick was leading in, they could have denied Romney a vctory.

[9YearLurker]

Oh, those knowledgeable independent voters!