1 posted on
08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by
rxsid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 321-337 next last
To: rxsid
Obama's Kenyan B.C.
To: rxsid; All
To any and all new viewers and posters!
Please forgive us, the regulars of Free Republic.
You might have noticed we get bashed in the press a lot. We get called a lot of names. We have our credibility and our sanity questioned on a regular basis. Yet, we are all just average people, and in some cases (not me) exceptional people.
That being said, we also get infiltrated regularly by those who are diametrically opposed to our beliefs, and what we see as our rights as Americans and Free people. Those infiltrators have at some times led us astray, hurt our credibility and or caused wasted hours in research on tangents.
In the end we here are about a few solid principles.
The first of which is the truth. We may not agree on what that truth is all the time, and may get personally upset and having our views questioned. We are a passionate group! But ultimately we want the TRUTH.
We believe that the constitution is not an elastic document meant to stretch, bend or otherwise be manipulated other than by specific state ratified Amendments.
We believe in Freedom, and the freedom of those to have opposing opinions, and the freedom to mock the wholey heck out of them at will! This is America and we get to do that here.
So to those of you who are new and do not know us, we are good people who have been taught not to trust. Experience has taught us to question nearly everything.
So welcome! We are glad to have you here, you are each and every one, a blessing! Because each of you is one more person who now can see the truth of who and what we are, and perhaps find more in common with FReepers than perhaps you ever imagined. We are NOT what is portrayed in the press.
We are Americans who have an undying love for this Nation and her citizens and for Freedom!
Thats Free Republic!
Welcome!
Danae
2,803 posted on
08/02/2009 1:44:50 PM PDT by
Danae
(- Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
To: rxsid
Somewhere around the 2000th post, someone quoted a post from KOS or DU, with several reasons for this COLB being a fake. The last one stated that the type font was Schmutz, which was invented in 1995.
The font in the Kenyan COLB is not Schmutz. The numerals 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 are obviously different. The Schmutz numerals 5 and 9 have graceful tails on the lower part, while the typewriter numerals in the KCOLB have the standard upward curl. The 6 is the reverse of the 9. The Schmutz 4 has an open top, while the KCOLB 4 has a closed top. The Schmutz 7 has a graceful long lower tail, while the KCOLB does not.
2,851 posted on
08/02/2009 1:56:02 PM PDT by
giotto
(title:)
To: rxsid
Wow!! Aproaching 100,000 views and 3,000 posts!!
This has got to get some press time tomorrow. Drudge hasn’t updated anything that I know of in 24 hrs.
To: rxsid
No matter what happens, they won’t be able to take down Obama until they take down ACORN first.
2,889 posted on
08/02/2009 2:03:34 PM PDT by
BuffaloJack
(thirst for absolute power is the natural disease of monarchy - Thomas Paine)
To: rxsid
I think someone is trying to scare people away from Orly’s site by reporting it as an “attack site.” Here’s what I got, which I think is the built-in warning in Firefox:
Reported Attack Site!
This web site at www.orlytaitzesq.com has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences.
Attack sites try to install programs that steal private information, use your computer to attack others, or damage your system.
Some attack sites intentionally distribute harmful software, but many are compromised without the knowledge or permission of their owners.
To: rxsid
What is the current listing status for www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1?
Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this web site may harm your computer.
Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 1 time(s) over the past 90 days.
What happened when Google visited this site?
Of the 12 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 4 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2009-08-01, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2009-08-01.Malicious software includes 5 scripting exploit(s). Successful infection resulted in an average of 2 new process(es) on the target machine.
Malicious software is hosted on 3 domain(s), including cybercrime-protection.cn/, security-alerts.cn/, mcafee-malware.com/.
1 domain(s) appear to be functioning as intermediaries for distributing malware to visitors of this site, including security-alerts.cn/.
This site was hosted on 1 network(s) including AS6245 (NETWORK).
Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware?
Over the past 90 days, www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1 appeared to function as an intermediary for the infection of 1 site(s) including zillr.com/.
Has this site hosted malware?
No, this site has not hosted malicious software over the past 90 days.
How did this happen?
In some cases, third parties can add malicious code to legitimate sites, which would cause us to show the warning message.
Next steps:
Updated 4 hours ago
To: rxsid
This proves nothing. It's a hoax. This will set the issue back and destroy any credibility you birthers have.
To: rxsid
As I have previously posted, but it seems a little late now...
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
2,960 posted on
08/02/2009 2:16:07 PM PDT by
Dryman
(Now, Back to Lurking)
To: rxsid
2,967 posted on
08/02/2009 2:17:23 PM PDT by
Kandy
To: rxsid
Hee hee... not a boring issue, is it?
Google might be trying to censor Taitz’ blog.
The site marked as “infected by malware”.
If you have that problem, go to her webmaster’s blog at:
http://www.obamanotqualified.com/
2,995 posted on
08/02/2009 2:21:43 PM PDT by
Vincent Jappi
(Google censorship of Taitz' blog?)
To: rxsid
Anyone send this photo and link out to all the media and newspapers? Oh and including talk radio?
To: rxsid
From: http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=6908 Update: A commenter by the name of “Holly” at the CountryFirst forum made the following observations: ..... Important side note: the Certificate issue date of Feb 17, 1964, is JUST A FEW SHORT MONTHS AFTER KENYA BECAME INDEPENDENT on Dec. 12, 1963. TO THIS DATE, this may be the only certificate on Kenyan file today if British documents were sent to the UK for archiving leading up Kenya becoming an independent nation. If you note the date on the Certified Copy, it was created by the Registrar in Kenya on Feb. 17, 1964. The Kenyan Birth Certificate would have been issued in the midst of the divorce — AFTER the divorce was filed by Ann in Hawaii on Jan. 20, but BEFORE the divorce was granted by Judge King on March 20. Furthermore, it’s quite plausible that once Ann actually had this Kenyan birth certificate in her hands, and the divorce was granted on March 20, her attorney, George Kerr, counseled her on Hawaiian birth certificate “loopholes” and told her how to file for a Hawaiian “Certificate of Delayed Birth” to get Welfare or OTHER support for young Obama as a child of a non-supporting foreign national. As Hawaiian law allows, that CODB could have been “upgraded” later to a “Certificate of Live Birth” in the 60s or 70s, which would then be a “root document” of the shorter “Certification of Live Birth” we see today presented as proof of birth from Barack Hussein Obama II.
3,066 posted on
08/02/2009 2:36:05 PM PDT by
Kandy
To: rxsid
Is the regisrar’s name Joshua Simon “Couya”...or “Oduya?”
From Wiki:
“Oduya is a surname, common among the Luo ethnic group in Kenya.”
To: rxsid
Damn. A three thousand post thread and I don’t even notice it till 12 hours later.
I gotta quit doing housework or something
;-)
3,086 posted on
08/02/2009 2:39:30 PM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(ABC-AP-MSNBC-All Obama, All the time.)
To: rxsid
Oh this is solid. I sent my sister (a big Obama supporter and Harvard grad) a picture along with the link. Her reply which is normally pretty good was lame. Basically she is trying to make the case the Obama was not the first foreign born President of the US. I just laughed when I read her reply.
She is really big on Huffington Post, and I usually figure out what the left id thinking by her reaction. They are worried. No doubt about it...
To: rxsid
The number on this "certificate" is suspicious;
47,044
47 = 47 Years Old = Current age of Obama
0 = O = Obama
44 = 44th = 44th President
We may be looking at a Kinko's document like the Bush National Guard Files.
3,138 posted on
08/02/2009 2:51:33 PM PDT by
America2012
(No Taxation By An Obamanation)
To: rxsid
Here’s a thought. Fukino et. al. apparently said the Hawaiian original was missing, but they had seen the original (or something to that effect). The only way to square this, assuming they aren’t lying through their teeth, is to suggest here is no original birth certificate, only an original that references his birth that was submitted by someone outside the hospital.
3,182 posted on
08/02/2009 3:00:18 PM PDT by
FastCoyote
(I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
To: rxsid
This purported Kenyan document has been debunked by Free Republic in just thirteen hours. If someone’s intent was to distract us or to make us objects of ridicule, then they have failed. Nice work all!
To: rxsid
Aside from verifying the names, dates, fonts, etc... what options do we have for a physical age verification of the actual paper and ink? I would image a small corner could be snipped off and tested. This is assuming its not a copy.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 321-337 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
