Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this really it? (re: possible Obama's Kenyan B.C. - Attny Taitz) Click on the link
orlytaitzesq.com ^ | 8/2/2009 | rxsid

Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid

Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 10,181-10,20010,201-10,22010,221-10,240 ... 12,621-12,640 next last
To: Author2
it’s true that he was born in a hospital in the Canal Zone

McCain was not born in a hospital in the Canal Zone. He was born in the Republic of Panama.

John Sidney McCain III was born at the Colon Hospital, located at Avenida Melendez and 2nd Street, Manzanillo Island, City of Colon, Republic of Panama. The time of birth on the birth certificate issued by Panama Railroad Company (which owned the Colon Hospital) was 5:25 PM and the day and date of birth was Saturday, August 29, 1936.

10,201 posted on 09/08/2009 4:02:38 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10154 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Thaks Fred...It’s always nice to catch up with it.


10,202 posted on 09/08/2009 5:17:46 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10198 | View Replies]

To: Deepest End

Thanks for follow up on this....Couldn’t get into the links to see what it was all about. Appreciate your good work.


10,203 posted on 09/08/2009 5:42:19 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10192 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Greatly appreciated. That explains why sometimes simply pressing “Enter” would give me a space and when I italicized something I did have spaces by hitting “Enter”


10,204 posted on 09/08/2009 5:55:43 AM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect NOBODY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10171 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

In stating Canal Zone I was speaking in general of Panama. I agree with your statement and the location on the hospital, but the facts remains there was a contract(?) with the NAVY to provide health care for the troops and the civilian dependents. It’s because of this contract(?) that they are considering the hospital in the same manner embassies are treated.


10,205 posted on 09/08/2009 7:17:46 AM PDT by Author2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10201 | View Replies]

Comment #10,206 Removed by Moderator

To: SupremeLaw
Some of you should think twice about exposing your ignorance here. Permit me to recommend that you ask questions first, and then you can make up your own mind about the correctness of any answers you receive.

Welcome to Freee Republic

How many cases have you filed and how many have you won? Have you served a subpoena on the Consul General or anyone else in Kenya?

10,207 posted on 09/08/2009 7:52:09 AM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10206 | View Replies]

To: Author2

“In stating Canal Zone I was speaking in general of Panama. I agree with your statement and the location on the hospital, but the facts remains there was a contract(?) with the NAVY to provide health care for the troops and the civilian dependents. It’s because of this contract(?) that they are considering the hospital in the same manner embassies are treated.”

Are you really trying to tell me that a hospital, owned by a New York railway company, is the same as an American Embassy?

You’re going to have to provide a source for that comment.


10,208 posted on 09/08/2009 8:38:10 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10205 | View Replies]

To: Author2

Because the Canal Zone was a “no man’s land,” in the words of Representative Sparkman, in 1937 Congress passed a statute, the Act of Aug. 4, 1937 (now codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1403(a)) granting citizenship to “[a]ny person born in the Canal Zone on or after February 26, 1904” who had at least one U.S. citizen parent. This Act made Senator McCain a U.S. citizen before his first birthday. But again, to be a natural born citizen, one must be a citizen at the moment of birth. Since Senator McCain became a citizen in his eleventh month of life, he does not satisfy this criterion, is not a natural born citizen, and thus is not “eligible to the Office of President.”

Copied from here http://www.michiganlawreview.org/firstimpressions/vol107/chin.htm


10,209 posted on 09/08/2009 9:13:03 AM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect NOBODY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10205 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge; darkwing104

IBTZ


10,210 posted on 09/08/2009 9:29:14 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (He must fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10206 | View Replies]

To: SupremeLaw

Do you like cats?


10,211 posted on 09/08/2009 9:30:54 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (He must fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10206 | View Replies]

To: Clinging Bitterly

10,212 posted on 09/08/2009 9:44:29 AM PDT by Old Sarge (Marking Time On The Government's Dime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10210 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
The private attorney general is completely legit and is being used in courts today and they are winning cases against the system. They are putting families back together when children are snatched for no good reason other than it is the monetary benefit of the system. They are going up against the IRS & the treasury and winning and the govt is starting to crack. You all need to go to AIB radio at talk shoe and listen to a few episodes, then go to their websites and start studying up. These folks have been out there in the trenches for decades working to restore our system and we need to get behind them and get the word spread farther & wider and stop the corruption.

http://www.futureamericanhistory.net/audiovideo.htm

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=48361&cmd=tc

http://www.barefootsworld.net/

http://www.lawlearners.net/

When you have the original law and Congressional records to back you, you are neither silly or amiss, you are on the side of the Republic and the Constitution, and thus on the side of ‘We the People’. Are U one of the people? If so, then come get on board!

10,213 posted on 09/08/2009 10:34:14 AM PDT by patlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10200 | View Replies]

To: Author2

in the same manner embassies are treated

Born in a US embassy is NOT being born on US soil, sorry. Being born on US soil is being born on US soil. It is a simple concept. Panama is NOT US SOIL. US had NO JURISDICTION in Colon or Panama City per treaty.


10,214 posted on 09/08/2009 10:39:43 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10205 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
Because the Canal Zone was a “no man’s land,” in the words of Representative Sparkman, in 1937 Congress passed a statute, the Act of Aug. 4, 1937 (now codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1403(a)) granting citizenship to “[a]ny person born in the Canal Zone on or after February 26, 1904” who had at least one U.S. citizen parent. This Act made Senator McCain a U.S. citizen before his first birthday

Sorry, John McCain was a “citizen at birth” (NOT natural born citizen) when he was BORN because both of his parents were US citizens REGARDLESS of WHERE he was born. This law is a moot point to McCain. He doesn’t need it.

10,215 posted on 09/08/2009 10:44:03 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10209 | View Replies]

To: patlin

Thanks- I was corrected about this on another thread. Still I have misgivings about this fellow..


10,216 posted on 09/08/2009 10:45:28 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10213 | View Replies]

To: SupremeLaw
Supremelaw, nuked kook.

10,217 posted on 09/08/2009 10:52:05 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (He must fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10212 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

Thank you.I am certainly no expert but my original point was that he was not a NBC. But needing to why he isn’t is important as it may come up again...


10,218 posted on 09/08/2009 10:52:31 AM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect NOBODY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10215 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

check out these websites also:

http://www.amendment-13.org/

http://www.mainemediaresources.com/mpl_birthcert.htm

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/magna_carta/legacy.html

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/magna_carta/

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/magna_carta/translation.html

http://www.barefootsworld.net/constit1.html

http://www.barefootsworld.net/aoc1777.html

http://www.barefootsworld.net/doi1776.html

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/acountry.htm ( A Country Defeated in Victory)


10,219 posted on 09/08/2009 11:09:39 AM PDT by patlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10216 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; Fred Nerks; BP2; Tennessee Nana; David; All
Calling attention to the fact that the article about Major Connie Rhodes is reported on Lucianne today.

Army captain challenges legitimacy of Barack Obama's birth certificate; Orly Taitz involved.

By ALAN RIQUELMY - ariquelmy@ledger-enquirer.com

An Army captain fighting deployment to Iraq has challenged the legitimacy of Barack Obama’s presidency in a federal complaint filed this month, and has employed attorney Orly Taitz — a national figure in the birther movement — to represent her.

The complaint of Capt. Connie Rhodes, filed Friday in the Columbus division of U.S. District Court, is similar to the July 8 suit filed by Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook, who sought conscientious objector status and a temporary injunction. Taitz represents both.

“Plaintiff ... submits and charges that the current de facto president is an illegal usurper, an unlawful pretender, an unqualified imposter ...” Rhodes’ complaint states. “(She) submits that she cannot lawfully act under his authority, but that she is being forced to do so without any opportunity or remedial avenue whatsoever.”

Rhodes seeks to stop U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, the commander of Fort Benning and others from giving any order to her or others until Obama’s legitimacy is established, the complaint states. She also seeks conscientious objector status based on her doubts of Obama’s constitutional qualifications.

10,220 posted on 09/08/2009 12:04:25 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 10,181-10,20010,201-10,22010,221-10,240 ... 12,621-12,640 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson