V-shaped UFOs in NM photos

examiner ^ | January 16 2009

[JoeProBono]

Reversing Nixon´s Dark UFO/ET Legacy
Ed Komarek
February 03, 2009

Everyone is familiar with the damage Nixon´s Watergate scandal did to the United States but there is an even darker legacy yet to surface into the public domain. This darker legacy revolves around Nixon´s secret extraterrestrial policies. These secret policies are turning out to be catastrophic for both global society and the global environment.

I believe that the UFO/ET community has been slow to grasp the significance of statements made by the late Ben Rich, former head of Lockheed´s Skunkworks, and aviation engineer Bill Uhouse. They both have stated that there had been a Nixon purge and privatization of extraterrestrial policy and exploitation of extraterrestrial resources in the 1960s. This took extraterrestrial policy out of the hands of both government and the military and put in the hands of industry and its CIA allies. (See previous articles http://exopolitics.blogspot.com/2008/10/targeting-corporation-x.html )

In my opinion the Nixon purge and privatization of United States extraterrestrial policy in the 1960s set back the UFO/ET disclosure process at least thirty years and suppressed beneficial extraterrestrial diplomatic initiatives by the State Department, military and other actors. The positive benefit of privatization was the secret efficient exploitation of extraterrestrial resources for both military and public use. The downside was that this positive benefit has been far outweighed by a continuation of the UFO cover-up and an extremely damaging industry-CIA profit based extraterrestrial policy.

In discussions involving an active duty naval officer by Shawn and Clay Pickering over the past year on the Open Minds Forum it appears that both the military and the State Department are reasserting control over extraterrestrial policy from private industry and the CIA. The military UFO Working Group and the State Department seem to have taken the lead in attempting to regain control over extraterrestrial diplomatic initiatives.

The overall situation seems to be continuing to improve with the incoming Obama administration where the Navy´s Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) is well represented. It is also well know that the Clintons had apparently been shut out of briefings involving extraterrestrial reality when Bill Clinton was in Office and so may not be complicit in the UFO cover-up. A further positive sign is that Hillary Clinton is now head of the State Department and a pro-disclosure John Podesta is closely allied with Bill and Hillary. http://www.presidentialufo.com/john_podesta.htm

According to the active duty naval officer know as Source A, several extraterrestrial races unified by a race that he calls the conformers are intent on making themselves known to world populations by 2017. All these developments seem to be creating a perfect storm that may push disclosure forward rapidly in the next several years. (See previous article http://exopolitics.blogspot.com/2009/01/naval-officers-contact.html )

Is it possible that we pro-disclosure advocates and activists inside and outside of government many no longer find ourselves fighting an anti-disclosure tide? Is it possible that the tide is about to change to support our efforts rather than hinder us? Perhaps Nixon´s dark extraterrestrial legacy may finally be coming to an end.

[JoeProBono]

Oh, and BTW:

I ONLY wish to be pinged by Las Vegas Dave ;-}

[Quix]

Are you joking about being ONLY pinged by Las Vegas Dave, or what?

Are we going to have to have

UFO PING LIST 1

AND

UFO PING LIST 2

???

Regardless, I will respond to whatever postings I feel like responding to! LOL.

In terms of your post above . . . SOBERING!

From one very evil basket into another VERY VERY VERY evil basket is NOT my idea of progress!

[Quix]

I

ASSUME

that you DO understand

that ANYONE WHO POSTS ON FR PUBLICALLY

WILL BE RESPONDED TO BY ANY OTHER FREEPER WHO FEELS LIKE RESPONDING.

There is no policy, custom, nor provision for anything different on that score.

I may try and limit my responses to your posts to those that I feel strongest about.

I will NOT be avoiding all your posts entirely, 100%, as far as I can anticipate at present.

[JoeProBono]

Of course I'm joking.

(Just responding to someone's silliness with silliness.)

[Quix]

Has anyone analyzed this video?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vUQIynCNYU

Where the bird flies virtually across the face of the UFO is interesting, to me.

Seems to me that there are a lot of features about this video which would speak very handily to hoax or non-hoax.

I think it was a Feb 2008 sighting in broad daylight. And the edges of the craft are far sharper in parts of the video than is common.

[Quix]

No sweat.

Folks are entitled to be silly—being humans and all.

Besides, some folks think I’m an eternal member of the

SILLY RABBIT club.

Though I never particularly enjoyed Trix.

[SonOfDarkSkies]

I think that was a remote controlled toy.

If it had been real, the dogs would have been howling uncontrollably (they were barking casually) and the camera man and others would have been screaming out of fear--but not a single "oh sh!t" was emitted.

[Quix]

This one is kind of interesting.

I don’t know if it’s CGI or not. Some low level cussing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdX8vuKL94s&feature=related

[Quix]

Your analysis is plausible to me.

Thanks.

How about this one of the Nellis purported smuggled tape with a debunker commenting on it’s validity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ldm7Px3HELA&feature=related

????????

[JoeProBono]

Re: Where the bird flies virtually across the face of the UFO

Here's a closeup

[Leo Farnsworth]

THEN REMOVE ME ENTIRELY.

I

DO

NOT

CARE

FOR

YOUR

OVERLY

LENGTHLY

POSTS.

I

HOPE

YOU

UNDERSTAND

THAT

I

DO

NOT

THINK

YOU

ARE

A

BAD

PERSON.

JUST

A

BIT

OF

A

PUTZ.

OK?

THIS

WAS

A

FUN

PING

LIST

UNTIL

RECIENTLY

WHEN

YOU

BEGAN

PINGING

ME

I

WISH

YOU

WELL

LEO.

[Quix]

So, does that indicate CGI?

Please provide commentary for your great work! LOL.

Where’s the bird in your closeup?

[Quix]

No sweat.

I think I understand.

It appears to me that things are being ratcheted up dramatically at a faster and faster clip.

I may be overdoing the ‘WAKE-UP’ call for some.

I’d rather over-do it than under-do it, however.

[JoeProBono]

Just providing raw material.

I’ll see if I can catch the bird.

(it ain’t easy catching birds)

[DCPatriot]

Quix...I promise to look real hard to find it, but I viewed a YOUTUBE video about a year ago.

IIRC, it was from Turkey or Spain...and it showed this exact duplicate of this craft passing overhead of the camera...coming around a building and down the street toward the camera.

Reading the comments at that time, it wasn’t but a few before somebody said that this had been proven to be a computer generated special effects hoax.

That particular video however, did NOT include the object lighting up and streaking out of sight the way yours does.

It would be a shame if it were a hoax but think about it for a second.

Why isn’t that video on the television 24/7?

[Quix]

Only as you care to bother, for sure.

I’m pretty ignorant about details of such technologies as CGI though I can wrap my noggin around the basic principles and factors.

I know the ATS thread seemed to have a chorus claiming hoax. However, I don’t think any of those were the ATS CGI experts. They just seemed to have a strong bias and loved to chime in claiming the same thing. There’s kind of cultural ethic there to be earliest at screaming hoax.

Kind of like there is here about being the earliest to be a nasty, mean-spirited naysayer.

Seems to be a less admirable part of human nature—partuclarly for some who’s early childhood nurture was clearly lacking.

[Quix]

The Oligarchy only allows precisely what they want on TV 24/7.

I think that even with a LOT of hoaxes . . .

IF

they mimic the authentic, they can still be illustrative.

And according to thousands of observers, many do rather remarkably mimic the authentic.

[Quix]

Avoid wasting a lot of your valuable time.

I just like to keep the topic before folks as much as I can bother with . . . perhaps between now and the fall. I don’t know . . . just what I feel I should do for the time being.

Many folks will not be awakened any other way. And if they are not, the shock may well lead to Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome for thousands of even CHRISTIAN FREEPERS. I’d rather do what I can to lessen that prospect, probability.

[JoeProBono]

Good bye Leo. I’m sure gonna miss you.

(I have no ping list but it is my thread :-)