Skip to comments.
Toddler Dies After Hooters Mom Forgets Child in Hot Car
Fox News ^
| October 31, 2007
Posted on 10/31/2007 9:54:09 AM PDT by rawhide
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360, 361-373 next last
To: slynx
341
posted on
11/01/2007 2:20:28 PM PDT
by
durasell
(!)
To: dan1123
How about this societal problem:
The mother is a moron.
342
posted on
11/01/2007 2:22:35 PM PDT
by
durasell
(!)
To: durasell
>> How about this societal problem:
The mother is a moron. <<
I don’t think you could necessarily conclude that from one instance of neglect. If she had put the kid into the wrong type of car seat with the seatbelt tied in knots instead of buckled, then you would have a good argument. When someone is told by authorities in her life that it is okay to sleep around, have a baby out of wedlock, and raise the baby in daycare, is the problem the authorities or the person who does what they say?
343
posted on
11/01/2007 2:36:22 PM PDT
by
dan1123
(You are to be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect. --Jesus)
To: ozzymandus
344
posted on
11/01/2007 6:40:19 PM PDT
by
Scotsman will be Free
(11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
To: dan1123
...is the problem the authorities or the person who does what they say?
Obviously, the problem is with the person — the individual. Doncha know, free will and all of that.
345
posted on
11/02/2007 12:55:31 AM PDT
by
durasell
(!)
To: TKDietz
Toddler Dies After Hooters Mom Forgets Child in Hot CarJust so we both know that we aren't viewing this from the "Entertainment Tonight" perspective....
We'll let time tell; for my part I'll say that 'baby drowns in bathtub', etc. may be the next phase in the abortion movement.
To: He Rides A White Horse
It must be depressing to have such a dim view of fellow human beings, or maybe you get some sort of charge out of it or the outrage you get to experience. Personally, I know moms, and abortion aside, it would be a rare one indeed that would intentionally kill her living and breathing child. It’s almost always going to be an accident when it happens, and it will always be a tragedy.
347
posted on
11/04/2007 10:07:01 PM PST
by
TKDietz
To: TKDietz
It must be depressing to have such a dim view of fellow human beings, or maybe you get some sort of charge out of it or the outrage you get to experience.Ahhh........no.
Personally, I know moms
I suppose you are one up on me....what do they look like?
Its almost always going to be an accident when it happens, and it will always be a tragedy.
I'm not the only person to hold such a "dim" view; you yourself say almost always; you can't cite exact numbers any more than I can.
We'll let time tell
You didn't miss that, did you?
To: slynx
If you haven’t noticed, FreeRepublic is full of people who have never made a mistake or sinned against God.
-— Or at least they think that’s the case. -—
To: TheThirdRuffian
Some people are just like that. I have learned thru the years that someone who must make others look bad in order to make themselves look better are not the type of people I would choose to surround myself with.
In my opinion, those that purpot themselves to be pius and infallible are neither.
350
posted on
11/09/2007 4:09:18 PM PST
by
slynx
(Proud Member of the Purple Fox Family!)
To: slynx
Oops...spelling mishap. I meant purport.
351
posted on
11/09/2007 4:10:06 PM PST
by
slynx
(Proud Member of the Purple Fox Family!)
To: nmh
How can a mother be so detached from her child?
I can't believe a mother could do this.
She would have to think: Care center, then work.
To: GovernmentShrinker
Yep. but the reason they are required by law to keep the kid in the back is so the passenger side airbag doesn't kill them in case of an accident.
If parents could shut the thing off and put the kid baak in front, I'd bet this would happen less often.
Just my $0.02.
353
posted on
11/12/2007 12:44:50 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: mwollstonecraft
Later on this “mother” admitted that she valued her FEEDOM more than her child. It was INTENTIONAL.
354
posted on
11/12/2007 3:59:51 AM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: Smokin' Joe
Agreed! Though I don’t think that’s the only reason the nany state requires young children be put in the back seat. I think it’s also because the front seat is at higher risk in a crash. But maybe if they’d get the multi-conviction drunk drivers off the road, there wouldn’t be so many crashes . . . And let us use our own judgement — like maybe put the kids in the back on for highway driving.
To: pandoraou812
Why anyone would want to punch you in the head is wayyyy beyond me. After all you ARE so charming...EFG Probably because of the post that your charmer had pulled, where he brought the guys mother in the conversation.
356
posted on
11/14/2007 5:51:00 AM PST
by
Hacksaw
(Appalachian by the grace of God - Montani Semper Liberi)
To: Hacksaw
Who are you talking about #1? & # 2 Why are you bringing this up on such an old topic? I am not going back to reread that whole thread ... As I can remember it, that was said in a teasing way. Do you have some problem with me Or whoever it was I was responding to? Sorry but I really don’t recall all my posts on that thread, & I don’t recall you either. Have a great day! ~P~
357
posted on
11/14/2007 6:30:36 AM PST
by
pandoraou812
( Its NOT for the good of the children! Its BS along with bending over for Muslim's demands)
To: pandoraou812
Who are you talking about #1? & # 2 Why are you bringing this up on such an old topic? I am not going back to reread that whole thread ... As I can remember it, that was said in a teasing way. Do you have some problem with me Or whoever it was I was responding to? Sorry but I really dont recall all my posts on that thread, & I dont recall you either. Have a great day! ~P~ #1 The gentlemen you were talking about
#2 Because I read the thread and was filling in some info for you.
And no, I don't have a problem with you unless replying to your post counts.
358
posted on
11/14/2007 6:44:53 AM PST
by
Hacksaw
(Appalachian by the grace of God - Montani Semper Liberi)
To: Hacksaw; TigersEye
Thanks you for replying. If I remember correctly that thread got a bit mean about another Freeper’s daughter working at Hooters so she could be near her baby who was in a hospital. I really don’t remember why I said that & since I am sick with a staph infection & upper respiratory infection I’m on so many meds so I don’t have the energy to read the whole thing. But it probably was my friend TigersEye.
359
posted on
11/14/2007 6:51:45 AM PST
by
pandoraou812
( Its NOT for the good of the children! Its BS along with bending over for Muslim's demands)
To: pandoraou812
Since this old thread has been stirred....I have a question. How come there are so many missing comments that have been “removed”??? Were these the really nasty ones?
360
posted on
11/14/2007 6:59:58 AM PST
by
slynx
(Proud Member of the Purple Fox Family!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360, 361-373 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson