Creation evangelist derides evolution as ‘dumbest’ theory [Kent Hovind Alert!]

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Post ^ | 17 December 2005 | Kayla Bunge

[AntiScumbag]

If you think the IRS waits a year and a half to indict people, you will be quite happy believing the fairty tale of evolution.

You really are totally clueless, aren't you?

The IRS, in conjuction with the DOJ (the IRS can't indict anyone, they refer criminal cases to the DOJ for prosecution after they have conducted their investigation) routinely takes years to get around to bringing criminal charges.

Take a look at recently convicted tax protesters/tax cheats Schiff, Rose, Meredith and Thompson. All of those cases dragged on for far more than one lousy year beyond the point where the IRS got interested in their activities.

You seem to think that your boy can do no wrong because he hasn't yet been criminally indicted and/or civilly enjoined. Believe it or not, it can take longer than a year or two to bring a scammer to justice.

I won't wait for your apology when you're finally disabused of your odd notion.

[VadeRetro]

May the good Lord shower you with health, prosperity, happiness and wisdom.

Before the stake catches me and wrestles me to the ground, yes. May you achieve calm and sobriety at the same time.

[Baraonda]

"I hope that when they come to get me, you're at the head of the pack."

You can always break that pact with the devil and repent. A little contrition goes a long way.

[Coyoteman]

How silly people are ... to believe in "evolution" and all the nonsense that goes with it.

And your explanation for these handsome creatures (and thousands of others) is...?

---

Herto skulls (Homo sapiens idaltu)

Some new fossils from Herto in Ethiopia, are the oldest known modern human fossils, at 160,000 yrs. The discoverers have assigned them to a new subspecies, Homo sapiens idaltu, and say that they are anatomically and chronologically intermediate between older archaic humans and more recent fully modern humans. Their age and anatomy is cited as strong evidence for the emergence of modern humans from Africa, and against the multiregional theory which argues that modern humans evolved in many places around the world.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/herto.html

[Full Court]

I don't claim that he has "done no wrong." I personally do not know if he has or has not as far as that case is concerned.

I do know for a fact that the last time the IRS tried to harrass him, they ended up returning the cars they seized.

And if the IRS had anything to charge him with, they would of done so already.

[ndt]

"What's so "laughably Luddite?"

Did you or did you not just call for the burning at the state of scientists (that would be antichrists to you)?

[Senator Bedfellow]

Molon Labe.

[Full Court]

Feathers added to a fossil? In these specimens we find powerful flight feathers on strong wings, shown as faint steaks radiating out from what appears to be a small reptile body. The head and body of Archaeopteryx is similar to that of a small coelurosaurian dinosaur, Compsognathus; the flight feathers are exactly like those of modern birds. If they were removed, the creature would appear to be only a small dinosaur. If you carefully examine a photograph of the "London specimen," you will note that the flight feathers consist only of carefully drawn lines!

http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/20hist09.htm

[Uri’el-2012]

If you would have ever taken a course in the "Philosophy of Science"
You would know that the "Theory of Evolution" has never advanced
past a hypothetical construct.

b'shem Y'shua

[Baraonda]

That public offer will never be paid out as there is no scientific proof of evolution. I guess that is the reason he made the offer.

[VadeRetro]

The head and body of Archaeopteryx is similar to that of a small coelurosaurian dinosaur, Compsognathus; the flight feathers are exactly like those of modern birds.

So you're going to be the first to argue with all the idiots from your side who chirp "Archaeopteryx is JUST A BIRD! A BIRD!??" You know better, right?

Actually, when Fred Hoyle claimed Archy was a fake, the fossils WERE carefully examined. They weren't.

BTW, we've recently found a new one. It also has clear feather impressions.

[Baraonda]

"I'm still waiting for my gold fish to "evolve" into a cat. How silly people are ... to believe in "evolution" and all the nonsense that goes with it."

And a bunch of nonsense it is.

[spinestein]

[What Hovind exposes is the fact that believers in the religion of evolutionist theory GLUED the moths to trees to try and support their "thoery."]




At first I thought this was really good and very subtle satire.

Then I realized you're serious.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"The Heackle drawings WERE and ARE used."

Prove it. Your anecdotal evidence is not enough.

" In fact, a friend of mine has a copy of the pages of that book. I made the copy at the time and sent them to him. "

I am sure you can provide us with this picture too.

"The evolution fairy take rests on nothing but lies and the Heackle drawings are just more proof of that."

They are not used, unless it's an historical sketch. PHOTOGRAPHS are used today. And learn to spell the man's name. It's Haeckel.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

" If you would have ever taken a course in the "Philosophy of Science" "

I have.

" You would know that the "Theory of Evolution" has never advanced
past a hypothetical construct."

I take it you never took (or at least passed) a philosophy of science class.

[Full Court]

You’ve probably never heard of this skeleton - it’s kept quiet by evolutionists. This well-authenticated discovery had been in the British Museum in London for nearly 70 years.

In 1812, a 5’ 2” fully human female skeleton was found, missing only the feet and head. It was found inside hard, ancient limestone, that was part of a formation more than a mile long! Modern geological dating places this formation at 28 million years old!

When the two-ton limestone block, containing Guadeloupe Woman, was displayed in the British Museum in 1812, it was displayed as proof of the Genesis Flood. But that was 20 years before Lyell and nearly 50 years before Darwin. In 1881, the exhibit was quietly taken down to the basement and hidden there.

www.evolution-facts.org/2evlch18a.htm

[Baraonda]

"May the good Lord shower you with health, prosperity, happiness and wisdom.

Before the stake catches me and wrestles me to the ground, yes."

=====

The sooner, the better. You're on your road to righteousness. Don't let the detractors sway you.

God bless and Merry Christmas.

[Baraonda]

I like this creationist threads.

Can you put me on your ping list?

I may not always contribute to it my vast accumulated knowledge, but at a minimun I'll give it a BUMP.

Thank you and may the Good Lord bless you.

[Full Court]

They are used. "2002 – believe it or not – Haeckel’s drawings still appear in many high school and college textbooks. Among them are "Evolutionary Biology" by Douglas J. Futuyma (Third Edition, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 1998), and also the bedrock text, "Molecular Biology of the Cell" (third edition), whose authors include biochemist Dr. Bruce Alberts, president of the National Academy of Sciences. Some texts which don’t use Haeckel’s forged drawings, still use his discredited theory. One of those is the current (1998) National Association of Science teacher’s guide, “Teaching About Evolution and the Nature of Science”. "

The book I checked out was from a public library. I saw this with my own eyes.

You can stomp your feet and throw a baby sit all you like, but the drawings are still being used to try and support the evolution fairy tale.

[RightWingAtheist]

Some biology professors have countered with a how-to DVD on debating Hovind: