Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $25,807
31%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 31%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: nuclearblackmail

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • NO NUKE BLACKMAIL

    04/26/2003 5:26:52 AM PDT · by kattracks · 5 replies · 210+ views
    New York Post ^ | 4/26/03
    <p>April 26, 2003 -- President Bush was right to label North Korea's claim that it now possesses a nuclear arsenal little more than an attempt at "blackmail."</p> <p>More important, the president made it clear "to the North Koreans and the world [that] we're not going to be threatened."</p>
  • FOOLS GOLD: THE 'LEGACY' OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ICONS OF APPEASEMENT & "LOOKING THE OTHER WAY"

    10/19/2002 7:04:57 AM PDT · by Apolitical · 2 replies · 254+ views
    The Iconoclast ^ | October 19, 2002 | Muray Soupcoff
    Will the depressing news about the ever-eroding "legacy" of William Jefferson Clinton, not to mention the never-ending gullibility and stupidity of Nobel Prize winner Jimmy Carter, never stop? Since 9/11, we've had countless reports of the missed opportunities of the Clinton administration to put Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda out of commission. And now comes the recent headline news that North Korea reneged on the Carter-brokered 1994 peaceful "accomodation" between the Clinton administration and the tyrannical North Korean dictatorial regime -- the "Agreed Framework" between the two nations in which North Korea agreed to freeze its nuclear weapons program and...
  • What the White House is Really Worried About – Nuclear Blackmail

    09/26/2002 3:43:08 PM PDT · by FoxPro · 66 replies · 257+ views
    http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil ^ | Monday, August 26, 2002 | FoxPro
    I haven’t heard this stated anywhere, but after reading several editorials, and the statement by Condoleezza Rice, something to the effect “We don’t want to witness a smoking gun where the smoke is a mushroom cloud”, it dawned on me what Western powers are really terrified of, losing power. The Assumptions: 1. Saddam Hussein possesses a few small nuclear devices. 2. He has the ability to secretly transport these devices to the United States. What he wont do: He wouldn’t actually detonate these devices in a large metropolitan area. This would be suicide on his part. If he did, there...
  • On The Road To Baghdad?

    08/23/2002 9:59:06 AM PDT · by Gopblond · 1 replies · 262+ views
    ETHER ZONE ^ | 8/23/02 | Carol Devine-Molin
    Given the likelihood of a US invasion of Iraq, it's utterly crucial and in the American spirit that we engage in an extensive national debate about this issue. Political staff writer Peter Grier of The Christian Science Monitor is somewhat accurate in his assessment that the more pertinent ideological debate is occurring within the Republican/Conservative camp rather than between the Republican - Democratic partisan divide. He states: "Call it "realists" versus "Reaganites", although this oversimplifies things". However, I conceptualize this ongoing dispute regarding an "Iraq attack" just a little bit differently, with a three-way split among the Republican/Conservative camp as...