Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $25,472
31%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 31%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: nadler

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Schumer Laments Schiff and Nadler Tactics [semi-satire]

    01/26/2020 10:21:48 AM PST · by John Semmens · 2 replies
    Semi-News/Semi-Satire ^ | 26 Jan 2020 | John Semmens
    Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY) lamented that "the abrasive style exhibited by the House impeachment managers may have doomed our chances for success. Calling senators 'traitors' if they don't vote to convict Trump is too heavy-handed. Though we might think they are traitors if they don't vote for conviction, saying this out loud is not wise. Similarly, threatening them with jail strikes me as premature. We might eventually get there if we defeat Trump and gain a majority in both houses on election day, but it's foolish to warn our enemies in advance." Meanwhile, Vice-President Joe Biden flatly refused...
  • HUGE REVELATION: Democrats on House Impeachment Team VOTED AGAINST the Aid Package for Ukraine They Want to Impeach Trump Over (VIDEO)

    01/26/2020 9:52:38 AM PST · by hapnHal · 35 replies
    thegatewaypundit ^ | January 26, 2020  | Jim Hoft
    The Democrat Party and their colleagues in the liberal mainstream media want to impeach President Trump for not sending lethal aid to the Ukraine quick enough. President Trump waited 55 days before release taxpayer-funded US aid to the Ukrainian government in 2019. Democrats want you to believe this was a crime or misdemeanor.BUT NOW THERE’S THIS… Those same Democrats on the House Impeachment Team VOTED AGAINST the aid package to the Ukraine last year!Three of the House Impeachment Managers voted AGAINST Aid to Ukraine. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) all voted against the bill that included...
  • Opening Argument – Patrick Philbin Explains an Unconstitutional Origin to The House Impeachment, And Why It Matters…

    01/25/2020 10:12:39 PM PST · by bitt · 31 replies
    CONSERVATIVE TREEHOUSE ^ | 1/25/2020 | SUNDANCE
    Several days ago we anticipated a potentially important point we hoped would start the impeachment defense for President Donald Trump. Today, attorney Patrick Philbin delivered. The issue is a critical constitutional component that needed emphasis, and it is good to see pundits finally starting to realize the significance. White House Counsel Patrick Philbin explains why House subpoenas were illegitimate: the subpoena power was never authorized; the initiating subpoena power was never voted on. Additionally, and specifically by design, absent a penalty for non-compliance, which factually makes a subpoena a ‘subpoena’, the Executive Branch had no constitutional pathway or process to...
  • Schumer Whiffs Impeachment: The Democratic leader succeeds only in unifying the Republican caucus.

    01/23/2020 5:27:07 PM PST · by karpov · 35 replies
    Wall Street Journal ^ | January 23, 2020 | Kimberley A. Strassel
    ... Mr. Schumer nonetheless had an opportunity to do what Democrats keep pretending to do: Take the proceedings seriously. Had he reached out to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to work on an agreement—had he privately spoken of the need for the Senate to come together and publicly refrained from partisan jabs—he’d have had an audience. Republican senators—in particular those up for re-election or retiring—don’t want to be accused of bias. As of last weekend, enough GOP senators to matter were still on the fence about Democratic demands for more witnesses. Not so much anymore. Mr. Schumer managed to annoy them,...
  • Impeachment backfire? Key GOP senator ‘offended’ by Nadler charge, as trial tests patience and stamina

    01/23/2020 11:56:22 AM PST · by conservative98 · 30 replies
    Fox News ^ | 1/29/20 | y Brooke Singman
    House Democrats' handling of the Trump impeachment to date may be turning off Republicans -- notably, those seen as possible defectors in a final vote. The first sign of a backlash among that critical group came Wednesday when Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, a moderate member of the conference, said she was offended by House manager Rep. Jerrold Nadler’s assertion that GOP members voting against allowing new testimony and evidence were engaged in a “cover-up.” “I took it as offensive,” she told reporters Wednesday. “As one who is listening attentively and working hard to get to a fair process, I was...
  • Adam Schiff Reportedly Released False Information In Ukraine Probe

    01/23/2020 8:54:06 AM PST · by bitt · 18 replies
    Daily Caller ^ | 1/22/2020 | chuck ross
    Rep. Adam Schiff released inaccurate information last week regarding a text message between Rudy Giuliani and a former associate concerning Ukraine-related matters, according to a news report. The California Democrat claimed in a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler on Jan. 14 that Soviet-born businessman Lev Parnas sent a message to Giuliani on July 3, 2019, about a potential meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Schiff asserted that Parnas’s message to Giuliani that he was “trying to get us mr Z” referred to an attempt to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. “Mr. Parnas continued to try to...
  • Jim Jordan: ‘7 Important Things’ Schiff ‘Had Exactly Wrong’ - and ‘We’re Supposed to Believe Him?’

    01/23/2020 8:32:22 AM PST · by jazusamo · 16 replies
    CNSNews ^ | January 23, 2020 | Craig Bannister
    After all his claims that turned out to be “exactly wrong,” how can senators be expected to believe Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-Calif.) claims during the Senate impeachment trials, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) asked Wednesday. Rep. Jordan tweeted video of his comments to reporters following Impeachment Manager Schiff’s two-plus hours of allegations against President Donald Trump at the trial: Schiff: 1. "More than circumstantial evidence" of collusion 2. Nunes memo was false 3. FISA process was fine 4. The "Whistleblower" would testify 5. "We haven't spoken... with the 'Whistleblower'" 6. Parodied @POTUS' call 7. "Mr. Z" referred to Zelensky But today...
  • Senate Impeachment Trial LIVE - day 3

    01/23/2020 6:56:43 AM PST · by Jim Robinson · 386 replies
    Senate Impeachment Trial LIVE - day 3
  • Oops: Nadler's Senate Tirade Had Opposite Effect on Key Swing Vote Senator (Murkowski)

    01/23/2020 8:08:24 AM PST · by SeekAndFind · 48 replies
    Townhall ^ | 01/23/2020 | Cortney O'Brien
    Sometimes when prosecutors appeal to jurors to do their duty, it works. Other times, it backfires. For impeachment manager Jerry Nadler, it went up in flames. It turns out his condemnation of the senators during the Trump impeachment trial didn't just earn him an admonition from Chief Justice John Roberts. It may have cost him a swing vote. During his remarks in the Senate on Tuesday night, Nadler alleged that any senator who voted against a measure to allow additional witnesses was guilty of a White House "cover up." It was an incendiary and outrageous claim that was soundly rejected...
  • Sen. Josh Hawley: Nadler basically accused senators of treason before Chief Justice Roberts admonished him

    01/22/2020 11:06:46 PM PST · by knighthawk · 21 replies
    Fox News ^ | January 22 2020 | Charles Creitz
    Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told "Tucker Carlson Tonight" Wednesday that he had never seen U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts admonish litigators the way had admonished House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y. and members of President Trump's legal team near the end of the first day of the Senate impeachment trial. "It's really extraordinary. I can say as somebody who has actually worked for John Roberts," said Hawley, who used to clerk for the Chief Justice. "I have never seen him do that before from any bench that I have ever seen him sit on." Roberts pounded the gavel as...
  • Whistleblower Was Overheard in '17 Discussing With Ally How to Remove Trump

    01/22/2020 7:15:33 AM PST · by edwinland · 94 replies
    RealClearInvestigations ^ | 1/22/2020 | Paul Sperry
    Barely two weeks after Donald Trump took office, Eric Ciaramella – the CIA analyst whose name was recently linked in a tweet by the president and mentioned by lawmakers as the anonymous “whistleblower" who touched off Trump's impeachment – was overheard in the White House discussing with another staffer how to remove the newly elected president from office, according to former colleagues. Sources told RealClearInvestigations the staffer with whom Ciaramella was speaking was Sean Misko. Both were Obama administration holdovers working in the Trump White House on foreign policy and national security issues. And both expressed anger over Trump’s new...
  • Impeachment-weary Trump tees off on ‘sleazebags’ Nadler and Schiff, says he’d ‘love’ to attend trial

    01/22/2020 7:43:32 AM PST · by knighthawk · 21 replies
    Fox News ^ | January 22 2020 | Brooke Singman, Ronn Blitzer
    President Trump slammed the House impeachment managers prosecuting the case against him as “sleazebags” during an impromptu press conference at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Wednesday -- while saying he'd "love" to attend his ongoing Senate trial back home. In the hastily called press event before Trump was to return to Washington, the president delivered an unsparing assessment of impeachment proceedings, which moved into full swing a day earlier and will resume later Wednesday with opening arguments. While making clear he's reluctant to approve any new witnesses to testify, he floated -- perhaps playfully -- the idea...
  • Senate Impeachment Trial LIVE - day 1

    01/21/2020 10:21:35 AM PST · by Jim Robinson · 1,350 replies
    Senate Impeachment Trial LIVE
  • The Democrats Destroyed Their Own Argument for More Impeachment Witnesses and Evidence

    01/22/2020 7:00:54 AM PST · by SeekAndFind · 23 replies
    PJ Media ^ | 01/22/2020 | Matt Margolis
    Last year, Democrats rushed through the impeachment hearings because they claimed the evidence was overwhelming and impeachment had to be done immediately. Today, they’re bellyaching about the need for more witnesses and evidence in order for there to be a fair trial. This is, of course, after the Democrats didn’t allow the president any of his own witnesses during the House impeachment inquiry, and chose not to subpoena more witnesses in favor of getting the vote to impeach over with, so, as Nancy Pelosi has said, President Trump would be “impeached for life.” As White House counsel Pat Cippollone noted...
  • If Senate ever calls additional witnesses, Barack Obama should be key witness in impeachment trial, not Joe or Hunter Biden

    01/22/2020 6:51:46 AM PST · by SeekAndFind · 13 replies
    American Thinker ^ | 01/22/2020 | By Neil Braithwaite
    Besides the transcript of the phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian president Zelensky, the second most important transcript is of Joe Biden's comments at a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations. (See below.) Here's why: It's been interesting to hear Republican politicians, Trump-supporters, a few objective journalists, conservative political pundits, and even President Trump himself continue to argue that Joe Biden was the person responsible for threatening a quid pro quo to a group of Ukrainian government leaders involving a billion-dollar loan guarantee from the USA and a prosecutor investigating corruption at the Ukrainian energy company...
  • Senate impeachment trial: Republicans vote to kill Democratic amendments seeking documents via Party-line Vote

    01/21/2020 7:02:11 PM PST · by SeekAndFind · 46 replies
    CNN ^ | 01/21/2020
    Senate Republicans defeated a series of amendments from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to subpoena the Trump administration for Ukraine documents on the opening day of the bitterly fought impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. Schumer offered several measures seeking a trove of documents from the White House, the State Department and the Office of Management and Budget that the Trump administration refused to turn over during the House's impeachment inquiry, but the amendments were thwarted one by one on 53-47, party-line votes. At around 7:30 p.m. ET, Schumer introduced his fourth amendment subpoenaing testimony from acting White House chief...
  • GOP Senators Should Focus on Eric Ciaramella in any Witness Deal

    01/22/2020 5:49:32 AM PST · by EyesOfTX · 39 replies
    DB Daily Update ^ | David Blackmon
    Rumors abound that small groups of Democrat and Republican senators are contemplating a “deal” on senate trial witnesses that end up with Democrats getting their wish to have John Bolton testify in exchange for Republicans calling the scummy Hunter Biden in to soil the Senate chamber. This would be a terrible deal for the President. Yes, there is no real doubt that Joe Biden and his son played a sleazy influence peddling game with the Ukraine while Biden was vice president. Yes, there should be legal consequences for both men, although we can be sure that our utterly corrupt Department...
  • BREAKING: Senate Majority Leader McConnell Lays Out Ground Rules for Trump's Impeachment Trial

    01/20/2020 3:38:13 PM PST · by jazusamo · 112 replies
    Townhall.com ^ | January 20, 2020 | Beth Baumann
    RESOLUTION AT LINK. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) on Monday released a resolution laying out the ground rules for President Donald Trump's impeachment trial. Trump's team and the House of Representatives have until 9 a.m. on Wednesday to file any motions. The exception being motions to subpoena witnesses or documents. All responses filed to any motions have to be in by 11 a.m. on Wednesday. The trial will begin at 1 p.m. on Wednesday. The House will have two days to make their case for impeachment but their time allotment cannot exceed 24 hours. After that, Trump's legal team...
  • Nadler says Dems unwilling to Negotiate on Hunter Biden Testimony

    01/19/2020 9:05:25 PM PST · by AnthonySoprano · 105 replies
    Fox News ^ | 1/19/2029 | Andrew O’Reilly
    “Nadler says Dems unwilling to negotiate Hunter Biden testimony in exchange for other witnesses” “Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., one of the House impeachment managers, dismissed on Sunday any notion that Democrats would be willing to negotiate on witnesses called during the Senate trial.”
  • Now that Pelosi has impeached Trump, she will become his stooge

    01/19/2020 4:00:39 AM PST · by Libloather · 24 replies
    NY Post ^ | 1/18/20 | Kyle Smith
    The more Nancy Pelosi tries to get people to take her seriously, the more ridiculous she is. During the impeachment vote, it was, “Everyone will take us seriously if we all just wear black.” For an entire month after that, it was, “Everyone will take us seriously if we withhold the articles of impeachment from the Senate.” This week, it was, “Everyone will take us seriously if we have a solemn procession across the floor of the Capitol.” No? Not that? How about fancy ceremonial pens? Would that make anyone take them seriously? Any takers? Nancy stopped just short of...